🔥 | Latest

Anarcho Primitivism: www.EXPRESSIVEEGG.ORG PRESENTS (THE TRUISH AND ACTUAL POLITICAL SPECTRUM OSCAR WILDE WILLIAM MORRIS BARACK OBAMA STALIN GEORGE ORWELL MY GRANDAD KRISHNAMURTI MARX JEREMY CORBYN FD ROOSEVELT STEVEN PINKER TONY BLAIR DONALD TRUMP HITLER IVAN ILLICH TOLSTOY ALDOUS HUXLEY NOAM CHOMSKY example proponents HENRY MILLER WILHELM REICH JOHN PILGER CHARLIE CHAPLIN MARK FISHER KEN LOACH MICHEL FOUCAULT SLAVOJ ŽIŽEK ADAM CURTIS ALAIN DE BOTTON NICK COHEN THE MAIL HENRY DAVIO THOREAU (see notes) ME BEZ FRANKJE BOYLE NATIONAL FRONT BARRY LONG GEORGE WOODCOCK NOE ITO MARK CURTIS MEDIALENS MARTIN LUTHER KING BERNIE SANDERS MICHAEL MOORE JORDAN PETERSON PLATO LAO TZU HUGO CHAVEZ RONALD REAGAN AYN RAND JOHN ZERZAN DH LAWRENCE MY MUM YOUNG RAN PRIEUR LEWIS MUMFORD AMY GOODMAN GEORGE GALLOWAY JOHN RUSKIN CLEMENT ATTLEE GEORGE MONBIOT HOLLYWOD HEGE ROBERT MCNAMARA ILL HICKS OLD RAN PRIEUR R PHILIP K DICK OB BLACK PETER KROPOTKIN JOHN LENNON RICHARD WOLFF DAVID CRAEBER CHARLES DICKENS MOST OF THE WORLD MORRISSEY JUNG ST.PAUL LAURIE PENNY CHURCHILL LENIN THE BBC THATCHER HENRY KISSINGER actual meaning official meaning - THE LEFT THE CENTRE 'the far left' / 'the loony left" THE FANATICAL RIGHT THE EXTREME LEFT THE FAR LEFT THE RIGHT THE FAR RIGHT *the left" 'insanity 'terrorism' / 'extremism *the right" politics DEMOCRACTIC 'ANARCHISM (MARKET) 'DEMOCRACY / 'INDIVIDUALISM OMNARCHISM / STANDARD ANARCHISM (SOCIAL) DEMOCRACY LIBERTARIANISH MARXISM / OFFICIAL SOCIALISM LIBERTARIAN / DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM LIBERALISM (UK) FASCISM RADICAL ANARCHISM "REFUSUAL OF WORK" MOVEMENT INDIMDUALISM (POLITICAL) ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM UNOFFICIAL SOCIALISM SUPPORT FOR TOTALITARIAN SYSTEM TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP INDMDUALISM (WILDIAN) POST-LEFTISM SITUATIONISM "ENLIGHTENED' MONARCHISM AUTHORITARIAN MONARCHISM "CAPITALISM (AKA PRIVATE CAPITALISM) ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISM "COMMUNISM' (AKA STATE CAPITALISM) PROFESSIONALISM CORPORATE SOCIALISM ('STAGVERSION') AUTHORITARIAN SOCIALISM LIBERALISM (US) / WAGE-SLAVERY FEUDALISM / TRADITIONAL SLAVERY THE OVERTON WINDOW (OFFICIALLY ACCEPTABLE / 'MAINSTREAM') Rule by democratic totalitarian systems, excess of choice, limitation of access to speech platforms, assimilation of minorities, belief in emotional-morality, 'imagination' and flexibility, and control by desire, debt and implicit threat of violence. No overt control of dissent (system selects for system-friendly voices). Huxleyan Dystopia. Most of the modern world (USA, Europe, Japan, etc.) Rule by unspoken context or by temporary and powerless leaders. No institutions (no need for them). lawless (soft guideline bounded), moneyless (gift-economy) and timeless. Used by most societies (and most friendships) for most of human history. Never been tried in a No state, extreme limitation of power. Citizen's income, local currencies, jubilees, etc. Extreme limits on energY consumption, complexity of institutions, power of technology. Untried. (N.b. Some strands of anarchism (e.g. Stirnan) are fanatical, extremely violent and cultdike). These are much publicised by 'the mainstream Rule by workers' councils, direct democracy, etc. Technophilic. Scattered examples in history (eg. Spanish civil war, pre-Bolshevik soviet Russia / Makhnovist Ukraine, etc). Rule by intellectuals and professionals oversee- ing democratic welfare state. Heavy restrictions on wealth-acquisition, privatisation, etc. Heavily unionised workplaces, heavily subsidised public services. Small or non-existant military. Very rare, but 1950s -1970s Britain, Scandinavia and Cuba exhibited many features. Rule by autocratic totalitarian people/ elites, limitation of choice, repression of speech and repression of minorities, belief in order, routine and rationalmorality and control by enclosure, fear and explicit violence. Violent repression of dissent (via "the party line). Orwellian Dystopia. Most of the pre-modern world + USSR, Nazi Germany, Saudi Arabia, etc ('the bad guys') government examples modern or agriIcultural society post B,000 BC. > SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND AUTHORITARIANISM SOCIAL EQUALITY AND INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM (theology) PANTHEISM "SPIRITUALISM' MYSTIC THEISM THEISM ATHEISM AGNOTICISM EXPLANATORY NOTES Marx isn't to the right of Chomsky! FDR isn't to the left of Stalin! And so on and so forth. First of all the above graph represents the political spectrum as it actually is, in real life, rather than as it is presented in the mainstream media (MSM). In real life, for example, the USSR practiced state capitalism (a system where the state controlled surplus) which is only different to the private capitalism of the west (where private owners control surplus) in the most superficial details. Life for ordinary people under 'capitalism, 'communism' and 'fascism' is identical, because they all share the same basic attitude to money, law, growth, science, work and so on: hence Stalin, Blair, Hitler, Obama and co are all on the far right. The Overton Window is Nonsensel Another reason why this graph seems doubtful is, of course, because real people, in the real world, often have complex and contradictory views about a range of subjects. Most of the views of DH Lawrence, for example, were about as far left as you can possi- bly get; he rejected civilisation in toto. Yet he also suggested the working class should all be rounded up into Crystal Palace and gassed! My grandad used to read The Sun, voted conservative, praised Thatcher and regularly warned me about the blacks and gays up in London; yet in his actual behaviour he vigoriously reject- ed authoritarianism and inequality and believed that ordinary people did not need professionals to direct their activities. The Overton Window represents the limits of acceptable thought in mainstream media and politics. The left side is the position of the middle or professional class, the (new) Labour Party or Democrat Party, the Guardian, the BBC, the Washington Post and so on. These groups are firmly to the far right of the actual political spectrum, although it is difficult to perceive this as they also com- prise journalists and academics who are slightly to the left of them; Steven Pinker, Owen Jones, Christopher Hitchens and other corp employees (stagversives) are used to give an impression of balance and adversarialism, and to attract members of the 'anti-corp' or "socialist' demographic into their ads for carbon-neutral package holidays and ethical mousemats. To venture beyond the corp-es- tablishment friendly feminism' of Laurie Penny or the 'originality' of reactionary writers like Jared Diamond or Malcolm Gladwell-to suggest that wealth should be radically redistributed, that we should head towards a classless society or that the MSN is organ- ised to reward only establishment-friendly voices-is to go beyond the pale, into the land of woo' or, more ominously, 'extremism' This is why the Overton Window is ignored or dismissed in the MSM, which must maintain the illusion of 'impartiality, variety. 'balance' and even 'anti-establishment bias: It's also why maniacs like Nick Cohen and Oliver Kamm describe themselves as 'left-wing." So if the MSM left and right are fictions, what is left and right? On the left is individual freedom and equality, which is based on a basic basic trust in humanity, or in reality. On the right is authori- tarianism and social stratification, which is based on basic cynicism. The scale, therefore, is to some degree* one of sanity. The further right you go, the more you view the universe as a vast pyramid of power which people must do whatever is necessary to climb. For this reason I have listed 'theology, which bears upon one's funda- mental political outlook, the right being typically a place where aggressive atheism, abrahamic theism, sham 'yoga-and-mindful- ness' spirituality thrive, the left being a place of heretical (non-duat ist) theism, pantheism and the like, and the centre, typically, informed by reasonable agnostics and open-minded atheists. Likewise in no sense is Bill Hicks a Tolstoyan or Slavoj Žižek a Jungi- an or Thatcher a Hegelian. So the above scale is faithful to the range of political opinions outside the reverse telescope of the mainstream media, but it also represents a kind of schematic aggregate or rough approximation of the political position of major characters in Western political history (most of whom, yes, were white and male). Of course Hitler and Stalin, like a few ultra-ultra-ultra right wingers today, are officially just outside the acceptable spectrum (it's just not the done thing nowadays to explicitly persecute racial minori- ties). But their fundamental approach to society and to reality remains the same as Pinochet's, Thatcher's, Clinton's, Churchill's and so on: which is why in all their societies the poor end up getting shafted and nature ends up getting decimated. by Darren Allen llustrations by AI *ie. bearing in mind the approximations mentioned above -it's ludicrous to decisively rate anyone's sanity- hence 'truish-let alone cal Hicks saner than Orwell or Wilde saner than Morris. Honestly not sure what to title this serpentine "political spectrum"
Anarcho Primitivism: www.EXPRESSIVEEGG.ORG PRESENTS
 (THE TRUISH AND ACTUAL
 POLITICAL SPECTRUM
 OSCAR WILDE
 WILLIAM MORRIS
 BARACK OBAMA
 STALIN
 GEORGE ORWELL
 MY GRANDAD
 KRISHNAMURTI
 MARX
 JEREMY CORBYN
 FD ROOSEVELT
 STEVEN PINKER
 TONY BLAIR
 DONALD TRUMP
 HITLER
 IVAN ILLICH
 TOLSTOY
 ALDOUS HUXLEY
 NOAM CHOMSKY
 example
 proponents
 HENRY MILLER
 WILHELM REICH
 JOHN PILGER CHARLIE CHAPLIN MARK FISHER KEN LOACH
 MICHEL FOUCAULT SLAVOJ ŽIŽEK ADAM CURTIS ALAIN DE BOTTON NICK COHEN
 THE MAIL
 HENRY DAVIO THOREAU
 (see notes)
 ME
 BEZ
 FRANKJE BOYLE
 NATIONAL
 FRONT
 BARRY LONG
 GEORGE WOODCOCK
 NOE ITO MARK CURTIS
 MEDIALENS
 MARTIN LUTHER KING
 BERNIE SANDERS MICHAEL MOORE
 JORDAN PETERSON
 PLATO
 LAO TZU
 HUGO CHAVEZ
 RONALD REAGAN AYN RAND
 JOHN ZERZAN
 DH LAWRENCE
 MY MUM
 YOUNG RAN PRIEUR
 LEWIS MUMFORD
 AMY GOODMAN
 GEORGE GALLOWAY JOHN RUSKIN
 CLEMENT ATTLEE GEORGE MONBIOT
 HOLLYWOD HEGE ROBERT MCNAMARA
 ILL HICKS
 OLD RAN PRIEUR
 R
 PHILIP K DICK
 OB BLACK PETER KROPOTKIN JOHN LENNON RICHARD WOLFF DAVID CRAEBER CHARLES DICKENS MOST OF THE WORLD MORRISSEY JUNG ST.PAUL
 LAURIE PENNY
 CHURCHILL LENIN
 THE BBC THATCHER HENRY KISSINGER
 actual meaning
 official meaning -
 THE LEFT
 THE CENTRE
 'the far left' / 'the loony left"
 THE FANATICAL RIGHT
 THE EXTREME LEFT
 THE FAR LEFT
 THE RIGHT
 THE FAR RIGHT
 *the left"
 'insanity
 'terrorism' / 'extremism
 *the right"
 politics
 DEMOCRACTIC 'ANARCHISM
 (MARKET) 'DEMOCRACY / 'INDIVIDUALISM
 OMNARCHISM /
 STANDARD ANARCHISM
 (SOCIAL) DEMOCRACY
 LIBERTARIANISH
 MARXISM / OFFICIAL SOCIALISM
 LIBERTARIAN / DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM
 LIBERALISM (UK)
 FASCISM
 RADICAL ANARCHISM
 "REFUSUAL OF WORK" MOVEMENT
 INDIMDUALISM (POLITICAL)
 ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM
 UNOFFICIAL SOCIALISM
 SUPPORT FOR TOTALITARIAN SYSTEM
 TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP
 INDMDUALISM (WILDIAN)
 POST-LEFTISM
 SITUATIONISM
 "ENLIGHTENED' MONARCHISM
 AUTHORITARIAN MONARCHISM
 "CAPITALISM (AKA PRIVATE CAPITALISM)
 ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISM
 "COMMUNISM' (AKA STATE CAPITALISM)
 PROFESSIONALISM
 CORPORATE SOCIALISM ('STAGVERSION')
 AUTHORITARIAN SOCIALISM
 LIBERALISM (US) / WAGE-SLAVERY
 FEUDALISM / TRADITIONAL SLAVERY
 THE OVERTON WINDOW (OFFICIALLY ACCEPTABLE / 'MAINSTREAM')
 Rule by democratic totalitarian systems,
 excess of choice, limitation of access to
 speech platforms, assimilation of minorities,
 belief in emotional-morality, 'imagination' and
 flexibility, and control by desire, debt and
 implicit threat of violence. No overt control of
 dissent (system selects for system-friendly
 voices). Huxleyan Dystopia. Most of the
 modern world (USA, Europe, Japan, etc.)
 Rule by unspoken context or by
 temporary and powerless leaders.
 No institutions (no need for them).
 lawless (soft guideline bounded),
 moneyless (gift-economy) and
 timeless. Used by most societies
 (and most friendships) for most of
 human history. Never been tried in a
 No state, extreme limitation of power.
 Citizen's income, local currencies,
 jubilees, etc. Extreme limits on energY
 consumption, complexity of institutions,
 power of technology. Untried.
 (N.b. Some strands of anarchism (e.g.
 Stirnan) are fanatical, extremely violent
 and cultdike). These are much publicised
 by 'the mainstream
 Rule by workers' councils, direct
 democracy, etc. Technophilic.
 Scattered examples in history (eg.
 Spanish civil war, pre-Bolshevik soviet
 Russia / Makhnovist Ukraine, etc).
 Rule by intellectuals and professionals oversee-
 ing democratic welfare state. Heavy restrictions
 on wealth-acquisition, privatisation, etc. Heavily
 unionised workplaces, heavily subsidised public
 services. Small or non-existant military. Very rare,
 but 1950s -1970s Britain, Scandinavia and Cuba
 exhibited many features.
 Rule by autocratic totalitarian people/
 elites, limitation of choice, repression of
 speech and repression of minorities, belief
 in order, routine and rationalmorality and
 control by enclosure, fear and explicit
 violence. Violent repression of dissent (via
 "the party line). Orwellian Dystopia. Most
 of the pre-modern world + USSR, Nazi
 Germany, Saudi Arabia, etc ('the bad guys')
 government
 examples
 modern or agriIcultural society post
 B,000 BC.
 > SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND AUTHORITARIANISM
 SOCIAL EQUALITY AND INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM
 (theology)
 PANTHEISM
 "SPIRITUALISM'
 MYSTIC THEISM
 THEISM
 ATHEISM
 AGNOTICISM
 EXPLANATORY NOTES
 Marx isn't to the right of Chomsky! FDR isn't to the left of Stalin!
 And so on and so forth. First of all the above graph represents the
 political spectrum as it actually is, in real life, rather than as it is
 presented in the mainstream media (MSM).
 In real life, for example, the USSR practiced state capitalism (a
 system where the state controlled surplus) which is only different
 to the private capitalism of the west (where private owners
 control surplus) in the most superficial details. Life for ordinary
 people under 'capitalism, 'communism' and 'fascism' is identical,
 because they all share the same basic attitude to money, law,
 growth, science, work and so on: hence Stalin, Blair, Hitler, Obama
 and co are all on the far right.
 The Overton Window is Nonsensel
 Another reason why this graph seems doubtful is, of course,
 because real people, in the real world, often have complex and
 contradictory views about a range of subjects. Most of the views of
 DH Lawrence, for example, were about as far left as you can possi-
 bly get; he rejected civilisation in toto. Yet he also suggested the
 working class should all be rounded up into Crystal Palace and
 gassed! My grandad used to read The Sun, voted conservative,
 praised Thatcher and regularly warned me about the blacks and
 gays up in London; yet in his actual behaviour he vigoriously reject-
 ed authoritarianism and inequality and believed that ordinary
 people did not need professionals to direct their activities.
 The Overton Window represents the limits of acceptable thought
 in mainstream media and politics. The left side is the position of the
 middle or professional class, the (new) Labour Party or Democrat
 Party, the Guardian, the BBC, the Washington Post and so on.
 These groups are firmly to the far right of the actual political
 spectrum, although it is difficult to perceive this as they also com-
 prise journalists and academics who are slightly to the left of them;
 Steven Pinker, Owen Jones, Christopher Hitchens and other corp
 employees (stagversives) are used to give an impression of balance
 and adversarialism, and to attract members of the 'anti-corp' or
 "socialist' demographic into their ads for carbon-neutral package
 holidays and ethical mousemats. To venture beyond the corp-es-
 tablishment friendly feminism' of Laurie Penny or the 'originality' of
 reactionary writers like Jared Diamond or Malcolm Gladwell-to
 suggest that wealth should be radically redistributed, that we
 should head towards a classless society or that the MSN is organ-
 ised to reward only establishment-friendly voices-is to go beyond
 the pale, into the land of woo' or, more ominously, 'extremism'
 This is why the Overton Window is ignored or dismissed in the
 MSM, which must maintain the illusion of 'impartiality, variety.
 'balance' and even 'anti-establishment bias: It's also why maniacs
 like Nick Cohen and Oliver Kamm describe themselves as 'left-wing."
 So if the MSM left and right are fictions, what is left and right?
 On the left is individual freedom and equality, which is based on a
 basic basic trust in humanity, or in reality. On the right is authori-
 tarianism and social stratification, which is based on basic cynicism.
 The scale, therefore, is to some degree* one of sanity. The further
 right you go, the more you view the universe as a vast pyramid of
 power which people must do whatever is necessary to climb. For
 this reason I have listed 'theology, which bears upon one's funda-
 mental political outlook, the right being typically a place where
 aggressive atheism, abrahamic theism, sham 'yoga-and-mindful-
 ness' spirituality thrive, the left being a place of heretical (non-duat
 ist) theism, pantheism and the like, and the centre, typically,
 informed by reasonable agnostics and open-minded atheists.
 Likewise in no sense is Bill Hicks a Tolstoyan or Slavoj Žižek a Jungi-
 an or Thatcher a Hegelian.
 So the above scale is faithful to the range of political opinions
 outside the reverse telescope of the mainstream media, but it also
 represents a kind of schematic aggregate or rough approximation
 of the political position of major characters in Western political
 history (most of whom, yes, were white and male).
 Of course Hitler and Stalin, like a few ultra-ultra-ultra right wingers
 today, are officially just outside the acceptable spectrum (it's just
 not the done thing nowadays to explicitly persecute racial minori-
 ties). But their fundamental approach to society and to reality
 remains the same as Pinochet's, Thatcher's, Clinton's, Churchill's
 and so on: which is why in all their societies the poor end up
 getting shafted and nature ends up getting decimated.
 by Darren Allen
 llustrations by AI
 *ie. bearing in mind the approximations mentioned above -it's ludicrous to decisively rate
 anyone's sanity- hence 'truish-let alone cal Hicks saner than Orwell or Wilde saner than Morris.
Honestly not sure what to title this serpentine "political spectrum"

Honestly not sure what to title this serpentine "political spectrum"

Anarcho Primitivism: Mysticism Anationalism Insurrectionary Anarchism Revolutionary Socialism Maoisnm Metaphysics Christian Communism sm urvivalist Egoist-Anarchism Eurasianism -INFP ouncil Communism Leninism /Trotskyism Mystical Anarchism Cosmopolitanism SURVIVALISM COMMUNISM Anarchist C Social Anarchism National Bolchevism Autarc nti-Stalinist I anarehism Autogestion Consequentialist Libertarianism Fabianism Labour Stirnerian Egoist-Anarchism Reformist Socialism Anarcha feminism ANARCHO- CAPITALISM INDIVIDUALIST ANARCHISM Libertarian Socialism ing Nationalism Possibilism SOCIAL Friedman (Libertari Right-Wing Anarchism Anarcho-punk Ethical Socialism DEMOCRACY Socalist Femairdhism Left Anarch Libertarian Tranhsumanism Paleolibertarianism teer Anarchsm nfoarmarchIsm Crypto-Anarchism Ultraliberalism Anarcho-Independantism ofeminism Ecosocialism Green Libertarianism Christian Anarchism Post-Colonial Anarchism Anarcho-Communism Agrarian Socialism Anarcho-Naturism Epistemological Anarchism Christian Socialism Minareosmudalism Heathian Anarchism reen Anarchisim Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism/Agorism Direct Democracy Christian Libertarianism Platformism Proudhonian Anarchism Post-anarchism Geoanarchismm LIBERTARIANISM Green Zionism narcho-Pacifism Libertarian Municipalism Anti-consumerism Localism arxis Libertarian Conservatism Anti-Corporate ActivistsAnti-Industrial Current Cooperation Mutualism Gaullism Syndicalism/Collectivist Anarchism Anarcho-Primitivism/Tribalism Radical Centrism onism National-Anarchism Nazism Corporate Dictatorship Conservative Progressivism Expansionnist Nationalism Fujimorism Integral Nationalism Neo-fascism FASCISMationalism NationiFurdaanentalism Right-Wing Nationalism Meritocracy Dictatorship WELFARISM ulism Islamic Liberalism NATIONALISM Neoconservatism Christian Right Guild Socialism Clerico-Nationalism Folkhemmet Social Liberalism Egalitarism Neohumanisn Clerical Fascism Tory Socialism Bioconservatism Political Catholicism Clericalism Social Conservatism National Conservatism ltural Conservatisnm Left-Wing Christian Liberal Nationalism SPOR Communalism REPUBLICANISM SOCIALISM Materialist Feminism Constitutionnalism Liberal Christianity Democratic Socialism Liberal Catholicism Anti-Environmentalism EST CONSERVATISM ESTP OnSumeris Liberal Conservatism Burkean Conservatism Conserative Liberalism Classical Liberalism Monarchism Paleoconservatism Paleoliberalism Supranationalism E Mecanism Economic Liberalism Universal Monarchy Trsnational Progressivism Globalism periali Verificationism
Anarcho Primitivism: Mysticism
 Anationalism
 Insurrectionary Anarchism
 Revolutionary Socialism
 Maoisnm
 Metaphysics
 Christian Communism
 sm
 urvivalist Egoist-Anarchism
 Eurasianism
 -INFP
 ouncil Communism
 Leninism /Trotskyism
 Mystical Anarchism
 Cosmopolitanism
 SURVIVALISM
 COMMUNISM
 Anarchist C
 Social Anarchism
 National Bolchevism
 Autarc
 nti-Stalinist I
 anarehism
 Autogestion
 Consequentialist Libertarianism
 Fabianism
 Labour
 Stirnerian Egoist-Anarchism
 Reformist Socialism
 Anarcha feminism
 ANARCHO-
 CAPITALISM
 INDIVIDUALIST
 ANARCHISM Libertarian Socialism
 ing Nationalism
 Possibilism SOCIAL
 Friedman (Libertari
 Right-Wing Anarchism
 Anarcho-punk
 Ethical Socialism
 DEMOCRACY Socalist Femairdhism Left Anarch
 Libertarian Tranhsumanism
 Paleolibertarianism
 teer Anarchsm
 nfoarmarchIsm
 Crypto-Anarchism Ultraliberalism
 Anarcho-Independantism
 ofeminism
 Ecosocialism
 Green Libertarianism
 Christian Anarchism
 Post-Colonial Anarchism
 Anarcho-Communism
 Agrarian Socialism
 Anarcho-Naturism
 Epistemological Anarchism
 Christian Socialism
 Minareosmudalism
 Heathian Anarchism
 reen Anarchisim
 Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism/Agorism
 Direct Democracy Christian Libertarianism
 Platformism
 Proudhonian Anarchism
 Post-anarchism
 Geoanarchismm LIBERTARIANISM
 Green Zionism
 narcho-Pacifism
 Libertarian Municipalism
 Anti-consumerism Localism
 arxis
 Libertarian Conservatism
 Anti-Corporate ActivistsAnti-Industrial Current
 Cooperation Mutualism Gaullism Syndicalism/Collectivist Anarchism
 Anarcho-Primitivism/Tribalism
 Radical Centrism
 onism
 National-Anarchism
 Nazism Corporate Dictatorship
 Conservative Progressivism
 Expansionnist Nationalism Fujimorism
 Integral Nationalism Neo-fascism FASCISMationalism NationiFurdaanentalism
 Right-Wing Nationalism
 Meritocracy Dictatorship
 WELFARISM
 ulism
 Islamic Liberalism
 NATIONALISM
 Neoconservatism
 Christian Right
 Guild Socialism
 Clerico-Nationalism
 Folkhemmet Social Liberalism Egalitarism
 Neohumanisn
 Clerical Fascism
 Tory Socialism
 Bioconservatism
 Political Catholicism
 Clericalism
 Social Conservatism
 National Conservatism
 ltural Conservatisnm
 Left-Wing Christian
 Liberal Nationalism
 SPOR
 Communalism
 REPUBLICANISM
 SOCIALISM
 Materialist Feminism
 Constitutionnalism
 Liberal Christianity
 Democratic Socialism
 Liberal Catholicism
 Anti-Environmentalism
 EST
 CONSERVATISM
 ESTP
 OnSumeris
 Liberal Conservatism
 Burkean Conservatism Conserative Liberalism
 Classical Liberalism
 Monarchism
 Paleoconservatism
 Paleoliberalism
 Supranationalism
 E
 Mecanism
 Economic Liberalism
 Universal Monarchy Trsnational Progressivism
 Globalism
 periali
 Verificationism
Anarcho Primitivism: WASH YOUR WN DISHES "If you can't wash, it's not my revolution" Dilemma Goldman CAPITALISM: ANARCHISM: You wash the dishes, the ones who own them profit. We all share in the dishwashing DEMOCRACY Even as a dishwasher, you deserve a say in which politician is best suited to MARXISM NEOLIBERALISM (AKA "Free Trade") SYNDICALISM The dishwashers join dishwasher studies the NATIONALISM Forget about those dishes for a second-you're a citizen of the proudest nation on earth! and you're free to develop your own combination of Unemployment and materialism, It turns out that thanks to his efforts the dirty dishes have been at which it is decided hich dishes are to be washed and LIBERTARIANISM his boss to invest in more dishes. The stuff about the dictatorship of the proletariat is more perplexing, but the ANARCHA-FEMINISM 5 water, longer breaks-same You wash the dishes, the REFORM You wash dishes for thee boss-who washes the dishes at home? FASCISM that it makes perfect ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISM The Mexicans who the dishes are deported, the SOCIALISM Jews who owned the place are imprisoned, and everyone just enough to afford higher dishwashers in a risky coup sense to them. Under their direction, he joins his fellow Dishwashers' wages increase ANARCHO-PUNK d'état. Afterwards, he is distraught to find himself still in the kitchen, washing INSURRECTIONARY dishes for party bureaucrs ANARCHISM COMMUNISM UNEMPLOYMENT From each according to his being trapped in a dishroom is being trapped outside one to his need-as detemined outside the dishroom him that they will eventually a political theory from the Crimethinc. Food Service Escapees / po box 2133/Greensboro NC /27402 /w from the excellent primer Abolish
Anarcho Primitivism: WASH YOUR
 WN DISHES
 "If you can't wash, it's not my revolution" Dilemma Goldman
 CAPITALISM:
 ANARCHISM:
 You wash the dishes, the
 ones who own them profit.
 We all share in the
 dishwashing
 DEMOCRACY
 Even as a dishwasher, you
 deserve a say in which
 politician is best suited to
 MARXISM
 NEOLIBERALISM
 (AKA "Free Trade")
 SYNDICALISM
 The dishwashers join
 dishwasher studies the
 NATIONALISM
 Forget about those dishes for
 a second-you're a citizen of
 the proudest nation on earth!
 and you're free to develop
 your own combination
 of Unemployment and
 materialism, It turns out
 that thanks to his efforts
 the dirty dishes have been
 at which it is decided hich
 dishes are to be washed and
 LIBERTARIANISM
 his boss to invest in more
 dishes. The stuff about the
 dictatorship of the proletariat
 is more perplexing, but the
 ANARCHA-FEMINISM
 5
 water, longer breaks-same
 You wash the dishes, the
 REFORM
 You wash dishes for thee
 boss-who washes the dishes
 at home?
 FASCISM
 that it makes perfect
 ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISM
 The Mexicans who
 the dishes are deported, the SOCIALISM
 Jews who owned the place
 are imprisoned, and everyone just enough to afford higher dishwashers in a risky coup
 sense to them. Under their
 direction, he joins his fellow
 Dishwashers' wages increase
 ANARCHO-PUNK
 d'état. Afterwards, he is
 distraught to find himself
 still in the kitchen, washing INSURRECTIONARY
 dishes for party bureaucrs ANARCHISM
 COMMUNISM
 UNEMPLOYMENT
 From each according to his
 being trapped in a dishroom
 is being trapped outside one
 to his need-as detemined
 outside the dishroom
 him that they will eventually
 a political theory from the
 Crimethinc. Food Service Escapees / po box 2133/Greensboro NC /27402 /w
 from the excellent primer Abolish
Anarcho Primitivism: 1 hrs Anarcho-syndicalism dialectically married as praxis to the theory of Autonomist Marxism is the solution to the immiseration of the Proletariat. Now if I can just frame that in working-class vernacular without academic jargon l can newsletter every trade union in The UK and get some numbers. (And probably come across as some kind of anarchist nutter!) But, We don't need a Vanguard Party because we don't need to seize state power. Political affiliations do not matter it is about the worker Trade Unions are levers of revolution, the primary site for workplace intervention Like Comment A Share Anarchy iz gud Like Reply 11 hrs It's not been successful since hunter-gatherer societies. An Autonomist trade union can exist within the current system as a site of resistance with the manpower for achieving better conditions across all sectors if individual unions can unite into a confederacy to represent la as an entire movement Like Reply 11 hrs I feel the idea that anarchism hasnt been successful since hunter gatherers is a kind of fallacy. Anarchism has been deliberately stamped out since the formation of large civilization. Autonomous anarchist groups for example are the only people succesfully finding of ISIS in Rojava and Kurdistan Like Reply 1 11 hrs If left to their own devices people will govern themselves and there are examples of this being done succesfully Like Reply O 1-11 hrs I'm working on a newsletter for trade unions. It's our best location in the United Kingdom. Although we are indirectly affected by terrorism linked to ISIS we have little in common with the Kurds. But having said that, the thing that unites us is our social class. There has to be a labour movement in The UK outside of politics like Scargill, for example, Like Reply 11 hrs Socialist organisation relies on Capitalist production Otherwise, there'd be nothing to organise Like Reply 11 hrs You're a Daoist, though, right? Like Reply 10 hrs I suppose my current thinking is anarcho-primitivism without the wholesale rejection of useful technologies Like Reply 10 hrs I think that, as a personal lifestyle, that is achievable! Are you Vegan, though? lol. As an ordained priest of The Church of the SubGenius l'm currently using my attainment of high levels of Slack' to facilitate higher levels of creativity through increased leisure-time. White all-night, sleep all day, drink in the evening. I used to work out, once upon a time lol Like Reply 10 hrs i am very politcs
Anarcho Primitivism: 1 hrs
 Anarcho-syndicalism dialectically married as praxis to the theory of
 Autonomist Marxism is the solution to the immiseration of the Proletariat. Now
 if I can just frame that in working-class vernacular without academic jargon l
 can newsletter every trade union in The UK and get some numbers. (And
 probably come across as some kind of anarchist nutter!) But, We don't need
 a Vanguard Party because we don't need to seize state power. Political
 affiliations do not matter it is about the worker Trade Unions are levers of
 revolution, the primary site for workplace intervention
 Like
 Comment
 A Share
 Anarchy iz gud
 Like Reply 11 hrs
 It's not been successful since hunter-gatherer societies. An
 Autonomist trade union can exist within the current system as a site of resistance
 with the manpower for achieving better conditions across all sectors if individual
 unions can unite into a confederacy to represent la
 as an entire movement
 Like Reply 11 hrs
 I feel the idea that anarchism hasnt been successful since
 hunter gatherers is a kind of fallacy. Anarchism has been deliberately
 stamped out since the formation of large civilization. Autonomous
 anarchist groups for example are the only people succesfully finding of
 ISIS in Rojava and Kurdistan
 Like Reply 1 11 hrs
 If left to their own devices people will govern themselves
 and there are examples of this being done succesfully
 Like Reply O 1-11 hrs
 I'm working on a newsletter for trade unions. It's our
 best location in the United
 Kingdom. Although we are indirectly affected
 by terrorism
 linked to ISIS we have little in common with the Kurds. But
 having said that, the thing that unites us is our social class. There has to
 be a labour movement in The UK outside of politics
 like Scargill, for
 example,
 Like Reply 11 hrs
 Socialist organisation relies on Capitalist production
 Otherwise, there'd be nothing to organise
 Like Reply 11 hrs
 You're a Daoist, though, right?
 Like Reply 10 hrs
 I suppose my current thinking is anarcho-primitivism without
 the wholesale rejection of useful technologies
 Like Reply 10 hrs
 I think that, as a personal lifestyle, that is achievable!
 Are you Vegan, though? lol. As an ordained priest of The Church of the
 SubGenius l'm currently using my attainment of high levels of Slack' to
 facilitate higher levels of creativity through increased leisure-time. White
 all-night, sleep all day, drink in the evening. I used to work out, once upon
 a time
 lol
 Like Reply 10 hrs
i am very politcs

i am very politcs

Anarcho Primitivism: ysticism ationalist tap nsurrectionaryAnarchism Revolutionary Socialism Egoist Anarchism Eurasianism ouncil Communiim Cosmopolitanism Bolchevism Leninism /Trotskyism SURVIVALISM Anarchi National Bolchevism Social Anarchism Mystical Autarchism Ant-Stalinist Left Autogestion consequentialist Libertarianim INTP INTI Reformint Socialism Stirnerian Egoist Anarchism ENFP INDIVIDUALIST Anarcha feminism ANARCHO- Left wing Nationalism ANARCHISM Classical Marxism CAPITALISM SOCIAL Right wing Anarchism Ethical Socialism DEMOCRACY Socialist Feminisan Left Anarch Queer Anarchism Tra Infoanarchism. Anarcho-Independant Green Libertarianism Crypeo Anarchism Ultraliberal Post-Colonial Anarchism Anarcho Episteaeological Anarchism Minarchism Free-Market Anarchism Christian Socialism Green Anarchism Agrarian socialian Direct Democracy Neo Feudalism Rothbardian Anarcho Capitalism/Agorism Echo Natarsa ECOLOGISM Heathian Anarchism Platformium ZIONISM Proudhonian Anarchism ISFP Post anarchism LIBERTARIANISM Anarcho-Pacifism Anti consumerisna Loealism Post-Marxism e ActivintsAnti Industrial corrent Libertarian Conservatism Cooperation Mutualisan Syndicalism Collectivist Anarc Anarcho Primitivism Tribalisna Radical Centrism National Anarchisa lulamic F ISTP C Thatcheriens FASCISM integral Nationalism Meritocracy Dictatorship WELFARISM Right Wine Nationalism Populism slamic Liberalisna NATIONALISM Guild Socialism CORPORATISM Folkhemmet Social Liberalism Egalitarian Christian Right Arab Socialism ENTJ Ierkal Fascism Bioconner ESFP Tory Socialism Political Catholicism Serial Conservatism National Conservatism Cultural Conservatism Left-wing Christian Liberal Nationalism ISTJ Auth Clericalism Radicalism Industrialism SOCIALISM REPUBLICANISM Neoliberalism Materialist Feminism Convtitutionnalim Liberal Christianity Demokratik Socialism Liberal Cat ESTP CONSERVATISM LIBERALISM Burkean Conservatism conser tive Liberalism Classical Liberalism Paleoliberalism Market Liberalism EconomicLiberalism Universal Monarchy ional Progressivism oCanis tio nca mperialism
Anarcho Primitivism: ysticism
 ationalist
 tap
 nsurrectionaryAnarchism
 Revolutionary Socialism
 Egoist Anarchism
 Eurasianism
 ouncil Communiim
 Cosmopolitanism
 Bolchevism
 Leninism /Trotskyism
 SURVIVALISM
 Anarchi
 National Bolchevism
 Social Anarchism
 Mystical
 Autarchism
 Ant-Stalinist Left
 Autogestion
 consequentialist Libertarianim
 INTP
 INTI
 Reformint Socialism
 Stirnerian
 Egoist Anarchism
 ENFP
 INDIVIDUALIST
 Anarcha feminism
 ANARCHO-
 Left wing Nationalism
 ANARCHISM
 Classical Marxism
 CAPITALISM
 SOCIAL
 Right wing Anarchism
 Ethical Socialism
 DEMOCRACY
 Socialist Feminisan
 Left Anarch
 Queer Anarchism
 Tra
 Infoanarchism.
 Anarcho-Independant
 Green Libertarianism
 Crypeo Anarchism Ultraliberal
 Post-Colonial Anarchism
 Anarcho
 Episteaeological Anarchism
 Minarchism
 Free-Market Anarchism
 Christian Socialism
 Green Anarchism
 Agrarian socialian
 Direct Democracy
 Neo Feudalism
 Rothbardian Anarcho Capitalism/Agorism
 Echo Natarsa
 ECOLOGISM
 Heathian Anarchism
 Platformium
 ZIONISM
 Proudhonian Anarchism
 ISFP
 Post anarchism
 LIBERTARIANISM
 Anarcho-Pacifism
 Anti consumerisna Loealism
 Post-Marxism
 e ActivintsAnti Industrial corrent
 Libertarian Conservatism
 Cooperation Mutualisan
 Syndicalism Collectivist Anarc
 Anarcho Primitivism Tribalisna
 Radical Centrism
 National Anarchisa
 lulamic F
 ISTP C
 Thatcheriens
 FASCISM
 integral Nationalism
 Meritocracy Dictatorship
 WELFARISM
 Right Wine Nationalism
 Populism
 slamic Liberalisna
 NATIONALISM
 Guild Socialism
 CORPORATISM
 Folkhemmet Social Liberalism
 Egalitarian
 Christian Right
 Arab Socialism
 ENTJ
 Ierkal Fascism
 Bioconner
 ESFP
 Tory Socialism
 Political Catholicism
 Serial Conservatism
 National Conservatism
 Cultural Conservatism
 Left-wing Christian
 Liberal Nationalism
 ISTJ
 Auth Clericalism
 Radicalism
 Industrialism
 SOCIALISM
 REPUBLICANISM
 Neoliberalism
 Materialist Feminism
 Convtitutionnalim
 Liberal Christianity Demokratik Socialism
 Liberal Cat
 ESTP
 CONSERVATISM
 LIBERALISM
 Burkean Conservatism
 conser tive Liberalism
 Classical Liberalism
 Paleoliberalism
 Market Liberalism
 EconomicLiberalism
 Universal Monarchy ional Progressivism
 oCanis
 tio
 nca
 mperialism
Anarcho Primitivism: A critique of anarcho-primitivism Obviously anarcho-primitivism is irrational, but this is mainly to show how a communist's solutions to proposed flaws of society are very much logical. — Anarcho-primitivism is a radical form of anarchism. Their beliefs is that civilization causes social antagonisms, coercion, alienation, and other things like overpopulation. Their solution is to deindustrialize the world and go back to a hunter-gatherer society. This would be nearly impossible to do as most humans do not want to go back to a primitive world, the "AnPrims" would easily be overpowered. Alas, their criticism of civilization is correct—that things like technological advances, non-nomadic ways of life, etc. cause distress to humans, but, their solution is incorrect: rather than using coercion to 'primitivize' society, you should break the material social chains that bind it up, for instance, the reason why there is class antagonism is mainly because of primitive accumulation: the means of production going from common and individual, to private and public. Instead of forcing humanity back 6,000 years, we can establish common ownership of property, to eliminate said class antagonisms. This sort of Alexandrian Solution to society's problems holds true too in anarcho-primitivist's other arguments against civilization. Second, a question. What would prevent society from evolving back to the way it started as before the deindustrialization and primitivization? An objection, I assume, would be that members of tribes can prevent certain technological advances, but assuming Dialectical Materialism holds true (which it does), when certain things like an abundance of food occurs, technological growth is bound to happen and humans will be naturally tempted to accept these, and in a less direct way, there could also be circumstances in which tribes are not even aware that they are laying the foundations for recivilization of the world. I can end my critique here.
Anarcho Primitivism: A critique of
 anarcho-primitivism
Obviously anarcho-primitivism is irrational, but this is mainly to show how a communist's solutions to proposed flaws of society are very much logical. — Anarcho-primitivism is a radical form of anarchism. Their beliefs is that civilization causes social antagonisms, coercion, alienation, and other things like overpopulation. Their solution is to deindustrialize the world and go back to a hunter-gatherer society. This would be nearly impossible to do as most humans do not want to go back to a primitive world, the "AnPrims" would easily be overpowered. Alas, their criticism of civilization is correct—that things like technological advances, non-nomadic ways of life, etc. cause distress to humans, but, their solution is incorrect: rather than using coercion to 'primitivize' society, you should break the material social chains that bind it up, for instance, the reason why there is class antagonism is mainly because of primitive accumulation: the means of production going from common and individual, to private and public. Instead of forcing humanity back 6,000 years, we can establish common ownership of property, to eliminate said class antagonisms. This sort of Alexandrian Solution to society's problems holds true too in anarcho-primitivist's other arguments against civilization. Second, a question. What would prevent society from evolving back to the way it started as before the deindustrialization and primitivization? An objection, I assume, would be that members of tribes can prevent certain technological advances, but assuming Dialectical Materialism holds true (which it does), when certain things like an abundance of food occurs, technological growth is bound to happen and humans will be naturally tempted to accept these, and in a less direct way, there could also be circumstances in which tribes are not even aware that they are laying the foundations for recivilization of the world. I can end my critique here.

Obviously anarcho-primitivism is irrational, but this is mainly to show how a communist's solutions to proposed flaws of society are very...