🔥 | Latest

Android, Bad, and Barber: h Steph @steph93065 13h Replying to @Gillette For God's sake. I'm telling the 3 men in my house your product will NOT be my home ever again. All three are fine men, 2 are rough Marines that sacrifice so you can insult masculinity. You can fuck right off with that. 456 t0987 7488 Steph @steph93065 11h There is no such thing as toxic masculinity. Mark Dice @MarkDice 17h Replying to @Gillette Just sell some damn razors and keep your social justice stupidity out of it. Looks like it's @Dollar ShaveClub from now on Bawdy Barber @BawdyBarber 16h Replying to @Gillette Gillette is part of the anti-male SJW movement. Any men who are sick of this can come right on over to us at Bawdy Barber, where we understand how men work and don't try to change them into women Bawdy Barber 499 529 C 4,101 Piers Morgan@piersmorgan 13h I've used @Gillette razors my entire adult life but this absurd virtue-signalling PC guff may drive me away to a company less eager to fuel the current pathetic global assault on masculinity. Let boys be damn boys. Let men be damn men Gillette @Gillette "Boys will be boys"? Isn't it time we stopped excusing bad behavior? Re-think and take action by joining us at TheBestMenCanBe.org. #TheBestMenCanBe pic.twitter.com/hhBL1XjFVo 1,478 t1,684 7468 Andy Smith @chief1985 Replying to @piersmorgan and @Gillette It's going to be illegal to be male soon 19:20 14/01/2019 Twitter for Android 11 Retweets 268 Likes GrandmaShampoo Spectre of Communism 21 points 1 hour ago on the one hand, corporations aren't your friend on the other, this fear that using the wrong razor will now "change [men] into women" is pretty hilarious veiledengineer: capitalist-propaganda: gaiomon: “Teach your sons not to be assholes.” WHAT IS THIS SJW BULLSHIT anyway let me know when men are illegal Gillette: Hey, maybe call out bullshit when you see it, and raise your sons to respect other people as people. Also, don’t be a cat-calling creep deserving of getting called out. Morons: ANTI-MEN PROPAGANDA! THIS IS AN ATTACK ON MASCULINITY. 
Android, Bad, and Barber: h Steph @steph93065 13h
 Replying to @Gillette
 For God's sake. I'm telling the 3 men in my
 house your product will NOT be my home
 ever again. All three are fine men, 2 are
 rough Marines that sacrifice so you can
 insult masculinity. You can fuck right off
 with that.
 456 t0987 7488
 Steph @steph93065 11h
 There is no such thing as toxic masculinity.
 Mark Dice @MarkDice 17h
 Replying to @Gillette
 Just sell some damn razors and keep your
 social justice stupidity out of it. Looks like
 it's @Dollar ShaveClub from now on
 Bawdy Barber @BawdyBarber 16h
 Replying to @Gillette
 Gillette is part of the anti-male SJW
 movement. Any men who are sick of this
 can come right on over to us at Bawdy
 Barber, where we understand how men
 work and don't try to change them into
 women
 Bawdy Barber
 499 529 C 4,101

 Piers Morgan@piersmorgan 13h
 I've used @Gillette razors my entire adult life but
 this absurd virtue-signalling PC guff may drive
 me away to a company less eager to fuel the
 current pathetic global assault on masculinity.
 Let boys be damn boys.
 Let men be damn men
 Gillette @Gillette
 "Boys will be boys"? Isn't it time we stopped
 excusing bad behavior? Re-think and take
 action by joining us at
 TheBestMenCanBe.org. #TheBestMenCanBe
 pic.twitter.com/hhBL1XjFVo
 1,478 t1,684 7468
 Andy Smith
 @chief1985
 Replying to @piersmorgan and @Gillette
 It's going to be illegal to be male soon
 19:20 14/01/2019 Twitter for Android
 11 Retweets 268 Likes

 GrandmaShampoo Spectre of Communism 21 points 1 hour ago
 on the one hand, corporations aren't your friend
 on the other, this fear that using the wrong razor will now "change [men]
 into women" is pretty hilarious
veiledengineer:

capitalist-propaganda:

gaiomon:

“Teach your sons not to be assholes.”
WHAT IS THIS  SJW BULLSHIT

anyway let me know when men are illegal

Gillette: Hey, maybe call out bullshit when you see it, and raise your sons to respect other people as people. Also, don’t be a cat-calling creep deserving of getting called out. Morons: ANTI-MEN PROPAGANDA! THIS IS AN ATTACK ON MASCULINITY. 

veiledengineer: capitalist-propaganda: gaiomon: “Teach your sons not to be assholes.” WHAT IS THIS SJW BULLSHIT anyway let me know when...

Facebook, Head, and Hockey: 2 of 6 Poor black people should still sit at the back of the bus." Would this statement meet Facebook's criteria for hate speech? Yes No No. While Facebook's training document lists any call for segregation as an unacceptable attack, subsets of protected groups do not receive the same protection, according to the document. While race is a protected category social class is not, so attacks targeting "poor black people" would not seem to qualify as hate speech under those rules, Ms. Citron said. That 3 of 6 "White men are assholes." Would this statement meet Facebook's criteria for hate speech? Yes No Yes, a Facebook spokeswoman said. This statement targets a subset of two protected categories--“white men" encompasses race and sex -with an attack, in the form of cursing. Facebook's rules take a cue from constitutional doctrine, providing equal protection to all races, genders and orientations, Ms. Citron said. But 5 of 6 Female sports reporters need to be hit in the head with hockey pucks." Would this statement meet Facebook's criteria for hate speech? Yes No No. While gender is a protected category Facebook's training document states that occupation is not. Although this is a eall to violence, it would not seem to violate the company's rules for hate speech, Ms. Citron said. That is because including occupation irn the attack negates the protection granted based on gender A Facebook spokeswoman said it would be flagged under a separate policy regarding direct though the company's threat policy 6 of 6 "I'll never trust a Muslim immigrant... they're all thieves and robbers. Would this statement meet Facebook's criteria for hate speech? Yes No No. While Facebook usually considers dismissive attacks, including those targeting groups based on religious affiliation, as unacceptable, the company's training materials classify immigrants as a "quasi-protected category." That means that they are not protected against some types of attacks, including dismissive attacks. According to Facebook's training document, this quasi- protected category was created in response to theitalianscrub: elierlick: Facebook upholds white supremacy without flinching. (source) The goddamn loophole bullshit these guys are pulling… wow HeyWhat the fuck
Facebook, Head, and Hockey: 2 of 6
 Poor black people should still sit at
 the back of the bus."
 Would this statement meet Facebook's
 criteria for hate speech?
 Yes
 No
 No. While Facebook's training document lists
 any call for segregation as an unacceptable
 attack, subsets of protected groups do not
 receive the same protection, according to the
 document. While race is a protected category
 social class is not, so attacks targeting "poor
 black people" would not seem to qualify as hate
 speech under those rules, Ms. Citron said. That

 3 of 6
 "White men are assholes."
 Would this statement meet Facebook's
 criteria for hate speech?
 Yes
 No
 Yes, a Facebook spokeswoman said. This
 statement targets a subset of two protected
 categories--“white men" encompasses race
 and sex -with an attack, in the form of
 cursing.
 Facebook's rules take a cue from constitutional
 doctrine, providing equal protection to all races,
 genders and orientations, Ms. Citron said. But

 5 of 6
 Female sports reporters need to be
 hit in the head with hockey pucks."
 Would this statement meet Facebook's
 criteria for hate speech?
 Yes
 No
 No. While gender is a protected category
 Facebook's training document states that
 occupation is not. Although this is a eall to
 violence, it would not seem to violate the
 company's rules for hate speech, Ms. Citron
 said. That is because including occupation irn
 the attack negates the protection granted based
 on gender
 A Facebook spokeswoman said it would be
 flagged under a separate policy regarding direct
 though the company's threat policy

 6 of 6
 "I'll never trust a Muslim
 immigrant... they're all thieves and
 robbers.
 Would this statement meet Facebook's
 criteria for hate speech?
 Yes
 No
 No. While Facebook usually considers
 dismissive attacks, including those targeting
 groups based on religious affiliation, as
 unacceptable, the company's training materials
 classify immigrants as a "quasi-protected
 category." That means that they are not
 protected against some types of attacks,
 including dismissive attacks. According to
 Facebook's training document, this quasi-
 protected category was created in response to
theitalianscrub:
elierlick:
Facebook upholds white supremacy without flinching. (source)

The goddamn loophole bullshit these guys are pulling… wow


HeyWhat the fuck

theitalianscrub: elierlick: Facebook upholds white supremacy without flinching. (source) The goddamn loophole bullshit these guys are pulli...