Blatantly


                    
                    
                

                

                

            

        
    







            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    

                        


	

	
    

        🔥 | Latest
    

    
    

        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: bryko:

watch his hair blatantly intersect with the lockers

    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: bryko:

watch his hair blatantly intersect with the lockers

                
                

                
            

            
            
bryko:

watch his hair blatantly intersect with the lockers


            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: When someone doesn't know Rick and Morty
 0
 Poor little Rickless
 ard
marzgurl:

schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:

That’s okay, I’m alright without it.

Trust me, it doesn’t need you either.


Cool.


Neat. We don’t need your lying toxic ass in any fandom. Now get the fuck off my post. 


Nah.


Why wanna get caught slipping again with Jewario And KickVic? 


Check out this expert who was totally there and knows every aspect about what happened in either of these subjects.
Stick to loving Rick  Morty, kid, and stop getting your info from conspiracy theorists YouTubers. Keep to the theme of your own blog.


Check out this loser trying to cover up bullshit that’s long been exposed. Maybe you should stick to being irrelevant.


“Exposed”. The same vocabulary used by right-wing extreme conspiracy theory YouTubers.
Like I said, stick to Rick  Morty. You going off the rails and off topic is not going to make your followers happy.


Huh. To me it seems like you don’t want people knowing you’re full of shit. Subvert and deny. That’s her M.O. same shit happened when you got called out for being shady in the past. It all just must be a conspiracy against you. You know when the whole change the channel thing blew up in your face after the allegations against Jewario came out. Or when the hash tag you started exposed you for the clout chasing hippocrite you are. But yeah you keep that narrative. 


Nobody is here subverting or denying anything. You’re willfully ignoring information being blatantly given to you in regards to JewWario. 90% of the producers who made videos for Channel Awesome did not know what was happening. His own wife had no idea. We didn’t know until four years after he was already dead. If you were really following those events last year, you would know that.
Having compassion and empathy for victims of sexual assault and harassment has absolutely zero to do with chasing clout. Stealing copyrighted material as well as other people’s memes and literally not caring that you’re doing it, however? There’s 100% no reason to do that other than for your own clout. 

Yeah I steal memes. My followers know it and I never made any attempts to deny it. But where in the world did I use any of that for clout? This was a meme blog that got huge in spite of its self. Used mostly to store memes for a fandom I enjoy. I never asked for likes, reblogs, or follows. Nor do I profit in any way from this blog. Since Im a faceless individual operating from one site, what clout is there to be chased? But lets also ignore the fact that memes are created to be shared and passed around or that shit tons of other blogs do it. You are willfully ignoring the evidence that points that a lot of channel awesome creators did know, yourself included, and hushed up about it. You claim you have empathy, yet continue to drag someones name through the mud. Despite the fact there is more proof to his innocence than his guilt. Especially when many of those allegations you backed were proven to be false. Those conspiracy videos and threads continue to prove that. So you can post your shitty youtube videos all you want. Lord knows any sane individual would distance themself from that mess after it tanked. But I really doubt any of your arguments will hold up in court. Hey maybe well see. Since Vic is heading up a defamation case. One I wouldnt be surprised to see you caught up in. Since theres TONS of proof you were involved with that situation.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: When someone doesn't know Rick and Morty
 0
 Poor little Rickless
 ard
marzgurl:

schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:

That’s okay, I’m alright without it.

Trust me, it doesn’t need you either.


Cool.


Neat. We don’t need your lying toxic ass in any fandom. Now get the fuck off my post. 


Nah.


Why wanna get caught slipping again with Jewario And KickVic? 


Check out this expert who was totally there and knows every aspect about what happened in either of these subjects.
Stick to loving Rick  Morty, kid, and stop getting your info from conspiracy theorists YouTubers. Keep to the theme of your own blog.


Check out this loser trying to cover up bullshit that’s long been exposed. Maybe you should stick to being irrelevant.


“Exposed”. The same vocabulary used by right-wing extreme conspiracy theory YouTubers.
Like I said, stick to Rick  Morty. You going off the rails and off topic is not going to make your followers happy.


Huh. To me it seems like you don’t want people knowing you’re full of shit. Subvert and deny. That’s her M.O. same shit happened when you got called out for being shady in the past. It all just must be a conspiracy against you. You know when the whole change the channel thing blew up in your face after the allegations against Jewario came out. Or when the hash tag you started exposed you for the clout chasing hippocrite you are. But yeah you keep that narrative. 


Nobody is here subverting or denying anything. You’re willfully ignoring information being blatantly given to you in regards to JewWario. 90% of the producers who made videos for Channel Awesome did not know what was happening. His own wife had no idea. We didn’t know until four years after he was already dead. If you were really following those events last year, you would know that.
Having compassion and empathy for victims of sexual assault and harassment has absolutely zero to do with chasing clout. Stealing copyrighted material as well as other people’s memes and literally not caring that you’re doing it, however? There’s 100% no reason to do that other than for your own clout. 

Yeah I steal memes. My followers know it and I never made any attempts to deny it. But where in the world did I use any of that for clout? This was a meme blog that got huge in spite of its self. Used mostly to store memes for a fandom I enjoy. I never asked for likes, reblogs, or follows. Nor do I profit in any way from this blog. Since Im a faceless individual operating from one site, what clout is there to be chased? But lets also ignore the fact that memes are created to be shared and passed around or that shit tons of other blogs do it. You are willfully ignoring the evidence that points that a lot of channel awesome creators did know, yourself included, and hushed up about it. You claim you have empathy, yet continue to drag someones name through the mud. Despite the fact there is more proof to his innocence than his guilt. Especially when many of those allegations you backed were proven to be false. Those conspiracy videos and threads continue to prove that. So you can post your shitty youtube videos all you want. Lord knows any sane individual would distance themself from that mess after it tanked. But I really doubt any of your arguments will hold up in court. Hey maybe well see. Since Vic is heading up a defamation case. One I wouldnt be surprised to see you caught up in. Since theres TONS of proof you were involved with that situation.
                
            

            
            
marzgurl:

schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwifty-memes:


marzgurl:


schwif...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: wait, you're jewish?
 i wanna die so bad right now
 -waaaaay too tall
 -blood is 3% soda
 -literally murders innocents and is still
 widely considered a "smol bean"
 -good relationship with their mom
 -hobbies range from making origami to
 plotting to blow up the moon
 -really their height is just unreasonable
 and very intimidating
 i heard you've been saying some shit
 grandparents live in korea
 -little ball of anger
 -uses napalm as moisturiser
 -no one is sure if they're actually
 racist or not
 thinks they can speak german
 -lists "kicking inanimate objects"
 as a hobby
 got sold fake cocaine once
 about me on your blog
 -damaged
 -iterally no one can bring themselves to like
 -communicates only in grunts
 -writes terrible fiction
 -goes out of their way to upset others
 -trying desperately to hide the gay (failing)
 -says shit like "adios" (doesn't speak spanish
 -leaves agressive voicemails
 -used to be emo
 -gets drunk and stabs inanimate objects
 -has an alien girlfriends and also 700 alter egos
 -is 103% sure that the world is out to get them
 way too many Ns
 little miss finland
 turns to camera in shock ADAM
 supreme gentleman
 -absolutely deplorable
 shoves an american flag up their ass
 most mornings
 takes selfies everywhere
 -everywhere i said
 loves their pets
 -finds depressive thinking arousing
 horrible handwriting
 tries. fails.
 -wants to be Wait, You're Jewish? but can't does rude shit but no one can stay
 -uses air quotes to patronise others
 -"feminism is stupid"
 -can't get laid
 -has probably had lip injections. and ego
 injections.
 "why do girls always go for douchebags"
 -wears sunglasses indoors. at night. in
 december. after the last star in the galaxy
 has burned out.
 mad at them
 -all gods are fictional except for themselfays gets asked for I.D.
 -makes fun of soccer moms but doesn't act hasn't taken a flattering photo in 7
 -says weird shit 97% of the time
 -wears t-shirts with edgy slogans
 -has v few friends but the friendships they clasifies self as a "cool kid"
 will not get a haircut
 hasn't slept ever
 do have a frighteningly intense
 56
 brennan's burger bundies
 gets what they want because they are-worships satan
 -known as the zodiac killer
 -takes off their glasses and becomes
 ets
 morbid sense of humour that
 occasionally gets them in trouble
 wants to have you (over) for dinner
 behaves drunk while sober and also
 while drunk.
 -vastly overestimates their ability to get
 away with things
 -does absolutely nothing in a group
 project and no one gets mad
 -dog person
 -has brushed their teeth less than 7
 times since birth
 probably borrowed their cheekbones
 off a meth addict
 -greasy grease on top of their grease
jeffreysdrunk:

luvoxxx:

Okeeey so I don’t usually post stuff but a friend of mine asked me to make a true crime tag yourself and I thought tumblr might appreciate it. I have no idea why there’s like 400 typos in it I swear English is my first language wtf. Anyway it’s just a meme it’s not meant to be disrespectful or gross or anything please enjoy my completely unfunny sense of humour. (Also I blatantly stole the  d a m a g e d  thing from another tag yourself I apologise)

I’m grandparents live in Korea and Dahmer lol

Way too many Ns *turns to camera in shock* Adam
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: wait, you're jewish?
 i wanna die so bad right now
 -waaaaay too tall
 -blood is 3% soda
 -literally murders innocents and is still
 widely considered a "smol bean"
 -good relationship with their mom
 -hobbies range from making origami to
 plotting to blow up the moon
 -really their height is just unreasonable
 and very intimidating
 i heard you've been saying some shit
 grandparents live in korea
 -little ball of anger
 -uses napalm as moisturiser
 -no one is sure if they're actually
 racist or not
 thinks they can speak german
 -lists "kicking inanimate objects"
 as a hobby
 got sold fake cocaine once
 about me on your blog
 -damaged
 -iterally no one can bring themselves to like
 -communicates only in grunts
 -writes terrible fiction
 -goes out of their way to upset others
 -trying desperately to hide the gay (failing)
 -says shit like "adios" (doesn't speak spanish
 -leaves agressive voicemails
 -used to be emo
 -gets drunk and stabs inanimate objects
 -has an alien girlfriends and also 700 alter egos
 -is 103% sure that the world is out to get them
 way too many Ns
 little miss finland
 turns to camera in shock ADAM
 supreme gentleman
 -absolutely deplorable
 shoves an american flag up their ass
 most mornings
 takes selfies everywhere
 -everywhere i said
 loves their pets
 -finds depressive thinking arousing
 horrible handwriting
 tries. fails.
 -wants to be Wait, You're Jewish? but can't does rude shit but no one can stay
 -uses air quotes to patronise others
 -"feminism is stupid"
 -can't get laid
 -has probably had lip injections. and ego
 injections.
 "why do girls always go for douchebags"
 -wears sunglasses indoors. at night. in
 december. after the last star in the galaxy
 has burned out.
 mad at them
 -all gods are fictional except for themselfays gets asked for I.D.
 -makes fun of soccer moms but doesn't act hasn't taken a flattering photo in 7
 -says weird shit 97% of the time
 -wears t-shirts with edgy slogans
 -has v few friends but the friendships they clasifies self as a "cool kid"
 will not get a haircut
 hasn't slept ever
 do have a frighteningly intense
 56
 brennan's burger bundies
 gets what they want because they are-worships satan
 -known as the zodiac killer
 -takes off their glasses and becomes
 ets
 morbid sense of humour that
 occasionally gets them in trouble
 wants to have you (over) for dinner
 behaves drunk while sober and also
 while drunk.
 -vastly overestimates their ability to get
 away with things
 -does absolutely nothing in a group
 project and no one gets mad
 -dog person
 -has brushed their teeth less than 7
 times since birth
 probably borrowed their cheekbones
 off a meth addict
 -greasy grease on top of their grease
jeffreysdrunk:

luvoxxx:

Okeeey so I don’t usually post stuff but a friend of mine asked me to make a true crime tag yourself and I thought tumblr might appreciate it. I have no idea why there’s like 400 typos in it I swear English is my first language wtf. Anyway it’s just a meme it’s not meant to be disrespectful or gross or anything please enjoy my completely unfunny sense of humour. (Also I blatantly stole the  d a m a g e d  thing from another tag yourself I apologise)

I’m grandparents live in Korea and Dahmer lol

Way too many Ns *turns to camera in shock* Adam
                
            

            
            
jeffreysdrunk:

luvoxxx:

Okeeey so I don’t usually post stuff but a friend of mine asked me to make a true crime tag yourself and I thou...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want

One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else


Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.


Important 


Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.

    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want

One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else


Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.


Important 


Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.

                
            

            
            
libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be force...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
gangster-computer-kebab:

libertarirynn:
fernandothefox:


slatmes:

skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:



This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.

CIA is getting lazy

O.o

“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”

Uh, that’s sort of the opposite of what’s going on here. All of the stations here are local stations which have been bought by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, a conservative group which has come under fire in the past for forcing news anchors on its stations to recite right-wing propaganda. So, yes, small news stations are under attack - but not from CNN and CBS (the stations in the video are local affiliates, not the national networks), from being taken over by Sinclair.

Until recently the FCC wouldn’t allow this kind of broad ownership of the airwaves. There’s actually an active investigation into whether Ajit Pai changed rules to benefit Sinclair’s recent expansions (source: CNN, NYTimes). 


Is no one going to point out how a lot of them where Fox News??…


Are you dense? These are local media stations owned by the same parent company, not the same as the Fox News network. And several of them were CBS and ABC. This has literally nothing to do with Fox News.

When you follow the money trail, you realize there is literally no difference between so-called “liberal” and “conservative” media.  

Of course there isn’t. They’re just there to sate the masses and keep them divided. Anybody who doesn’t know this by now is kidding themselves
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
gangster-computer-kebab:

libertarirynn:
fernandothefox:


slatmes:

skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:



This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.

CIA is getting lazy

O.o

“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”

Uh, that’s sort of the opposite of what’s going on here. All of the stations here are local stations which have been bought by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, a conservative group which has come under fire in the past for forcing news anchors on its stations to recite right-wing propaganda. So, yes, small news stations are under attack - but not from CNN and CBS (the stations in the video are local affiliates, not the national networks), from being taken over by Sinclair.

Until recently the FCC wouldn’t allow this kind of broad ownership of the airwaves. There’s actually an active investigation into whether Ajit Pai changed rules to benefit Sinclair’s recent expansions (source: CNN, NYTimes). 


Is no one going to point out how a lot of them where Fox News??…


Are you dense? These are local media stations owned by the same parent company, not the same as the Fox News network. And several of them were CBS and ABC. This has literally nothing to do with Fox News.

When you follow the money trail, you realize there is literally no difference between so-called “liberal” and “conservative” media.  

Of course there isn’t. They’re just there to sate the masses and keep them divided. Anybody who doesn’t know this by now is kidding themselves
                
                

                
            

            
            
gangster-computer-kebab:

libertarirynn:
fernandothefox:


slatmes:

skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patr...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
fernandothefox:

slatmes:
skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:



This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.

CIA is getting lazy

O.o

“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”

Uh, that’s sort of the opposite of what’s going on here. All of the stations here are local stations which have been bought by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, a conservative group which has come under fire in the past for forcing news anchors on its stations to recite right-wing propaganda. So, yes, small news stations are under attack - but not from CNN and CBS (the stations in the video are local affiliates, not the national networks), from being taken over by Sinclair.

Until recently the FCC wouldn’t allow this kind of broad ownership of the airwaves. There’s actually an active investigation into whether Ajit Pai changed rules to benefit Sinclair’s recent expansions (source: CNN, NYTimes). 


Is no one going to point out how a lot of them where Fox News??…

Are you dense? These are local media stations owned by the same parent company, not the same as the Fox News network. And several of them were CBS and ABC. This has literally nothing to do with Fox News.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
fernandothefox:

slatmes:
skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:



This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.

CIA is getting lazy

O.o

“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”

Uh, that’s sort of the opposite of what’s going on here. All of the stations here are local stations which have been bought by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, a conservative group which has come under fire in the past for forcing news anchors on its stations to recite right-wing propaganda. So, yes, small news stations are under attack - but not from CNN and CBS (the stations in the video are local affiliates, not the national networks), from being taken over by Sinclair.

Until recently the FCC wouldn’t allow this kind of broad ownership of the airwaves. There’s actually an active investigation into whether Ajit Pai changed rules to benefit Sinclair’s recent expansions (source: CNN, NYTimes). 


Is no one going to point out how a lot of them where Fox News??…

Are you dense? These are local media stations owned by the same parent company, not the same as the Fox News network. And several of them were CBS and ABC. This has literally nothing to do with Fox News.
                
                

                
            

            
            
fernandothefox:

slatmes:
skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diar...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: Freehand Profit liked
 Domonique .
 @ChefDomonique
 You know how racist you have to be to
 use the N-word during a conference
 call
 About
 Pizza ?????
 7/12/18, 1:55 AM
 6,247 Retweets 17.5K Likes
 Sean McGregor @SeanToo Trill-1d ﹀
 Replying to @ChefDomonique
 Like how does that word even work
 itself into the conversation
 3
 172
 Domonique @ChefDomonique.1d
 Buddv iust needs to aive me the garlic
<p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/176012420944/curiooftheheart-celticpyro-iirc-he-was" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="https://curiooftheheart.tumblr.com/post/176012238756/celticpyro-iirc-he-was-talking-about-his" class="tumblr_blog">curiooftheheart</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/176012105014/iirc-he-was-talking-about-his-upbringing-and-about" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>IIRC he was talking about his upbringing and about how racist a neighborhood he grew up in (and that it was terrible how blatantly racist they were in that time and place). In context, he was saying “They would call you the n-word openly” but he actually said the word. <br/></p></blockquote>

<p>From what I’m seeing apparently he for some fucking reason decided to claim Colonel Sanders used that word with no public backlash (like the reason is because Papa John himself was getting backlash for comments on NFL protests but even then he really didn’t have to bring up or quote exactly the Colonol). And the thing about a racist neighborhood was  to bring up tying black people to trucks and basically keelhauling them…ostensibly in an attempt to go “See I’m from an area that did this and think it’s so I’m not racist.” But the people he was talking to rather reasonably went “Why the fuck would you talk about that???”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Okay, that’s fair.<br/></p></blockquote>

<p>Yeah that was the context of the statements and it’s like… Maybe you’re not a big racist yourself but holy fuck dude, in this day and age do you not see how you can’t say shit like that on a phone call? There were about a million better ways to communicate “I’m not racist“ or just vaguely say “I remember how bad racism was growing up“. At no point did you need to actually use the N-word or go into graphic descriptions of racist violence.</p>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: Freehand Profit liked
 Domonique .
 @ChefDomonique
 You know how racist you have to be to
 use the N-word during a conference
 call
 About
 Pizza ?????
 7/12/18, 1:55 AM
 6,247 Retweets 17.5K Likes
 Sean McGregor @SeanToo Trill-1d ﹀
 Replying to @ChefDomonique
 Like how does that word even work
 itself into the conversation
 3
 172
 Domonique @ChefDomonique.1d
 Buddv iust needs to aive me the garlic
<p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/176012420944/curiooftheheart-celticpyro-iirc-he-was" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="https://curiooftheheart.tumblr.com/post/176012238756/celticpyro-iirc-he-was-talking-about-his" class="tumblr_blog">curiooftheheart</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/176012105014/iirc-he-was-talking-about-his-upbringing-and-about" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>IIRC he was talking about his upbringing and about how racist a neighborhood he grew up in (and that it was terrible how blatantly racist they were in that time and place). In context, he was saying “They would call you the n-word openly” but he actually said the word. <br/></p></blockquote>

<p>From what I’m seeing apparently he for some fucking reason decided to claim Colonel Sanders used that word with no public backlash (like the reason is because Papa John himself was getting backlash for comments on NFL protests but even then he really didn’t have to bring up or quote exactly the Colonol). And the thing about a racist neighborhood was  to bring up tying black people to trucks and basically keelhauling them…ostensibly in an attempt to go “See I’m from an area that did this and think it’s so I’m not racist.” But the people he was talking to rather reasonably went “Why the fuck would you talk about that???”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Okay, that’s fair.<br/></p></blockquote>

<p>Yeah that was the context of the statements and it’s like… Maybe you’re not a big racist yourself but holy fuck dude, in this day and age do you not see how you can’t say shit like that on a phone call? There were about a million better ways to communicate “I’m not racist“ or just vaguely say “I remember how bad racism was growing up“. At no point did you need to actually use the N-word or go into graphic descriptions of racist violence.</p>
                
            

            
            
<p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/176012420944/curiooftheheart-celticpyro-iirc-he-was" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
slatmes:
skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:



This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.

CIA is getting lazy

O.o

“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”

Uh, that’s sort of the opposite of what’s going on here. All of the stations here are local stations which have been bought by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, a conservative group which has come under fire in the past for forcing news anchors on its stations to recite right-wing propaganda. So, yes, small news stations are under attack - but not from CNN and CBS (the stations in the video are local affiliates, not the national networks), from being taken over by Sinclair.

Until recently the FCC wouldn’t allow this kind of broad ownership of the airwaves. There’s actually an active investigation into whether Ajit Pai changed rules to benefit Sinclair’s recent expansions (source: CNN, NYTimes). 

    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
slatmes:
skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:



This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.

CIA is getting lazy

O.o

“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”

Uh, that’s sort of the opposite of what’s going on here. All of the stations here are local stations which have been bought by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, a conservative group which has come under fire in the past for forcing news anchors on its stations to recite right-wing propaganda. So, yes, small news stations are under attack - but not from CNN and CBS (the stations in the video are local affiliates, not the national networks), from being taken over by Sinclair.

Until recently the FCC wouldn’t allow this kind of broad ownership of the airwaves. There’s actually an active investigation into whether Ajit Pai changed rules to benefit Sinclair’s recent expansions (source: CNN, NYTimes). 

                
                

                
            

            
            
slatmes:
skywalkingintheair:

hello-kitty-senpai:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

pennamites:

castle-engineer:

diarrheaworldstarhiph...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
peteschult:

libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want

One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else


Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.


Important 


Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.


Cops are *never* your friends. And they are under no obligation to protect you. Ever.
Get rid of pigs!

    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
peteschult:

libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want

One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else


Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.


Important 


Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.


Cops are *never* your friends. And they are under no obligation to protect you. Ever.
Get rid of pigs!

                
            

            
            
peteschult:

libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may leg...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
<p><a href="https://badshit-kid-art.tumblr.com/post/172609087216/tzikeh-sugarpineone-erwinisbi" class="tumblr_blog">badshit-kid-art</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://tzikeh.tumblr.com/post/172525974303/sugarpineone-erwinisbi-pinetreeanarchism" class="tumblr_blog">tzikeh</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://sugarpineone.tumblr.com/post/172482938914/erwinisbi-pinetreeanarchism-arirosie" class="tumblr_blog">sugarpineone</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://erwinisbi.tumblr.com/post/172473506669/pinetreeanarchism-arirosie" class="tumblr_blog">erwinisbi</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pinetreeanarchism.tumblr.com/post/172470103382/arirosie-friendly-neighborhood-patriarch" class="tumblr_blog">pinetreeanarchism</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://arirosie.tumblr.com/post/172466881265/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch-pennamites" class="tumblr_blog">arirosie</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/172466565062/pennamites-castle-engineer" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pennamites.tumblr.com/post/172466056952/castle-engineer-diarrheaworldstarhiphop" class="tumblr_blog">pennamites</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://castle-engineer.tumblr.com/post/172465935569/diarrheaworldstarhiphop-this-is-one-of-those" class="tumblr_blog">castle-engineer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://diarrheaworldstarhiphop.tumblr.com/post/172465577419" class="tumblr_blog">diarrheaworldstarhiphop</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/f5009587c75dfb2af3a5127ccb865f6a/tumblr_inline_p6hh0fW1OV1qg6gjx_540.png" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CIA is getting lazy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>O.o</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It is really creepy how they all have the same freaking script </p>
</blockquote>

<p>What the fuck</p>
</blockquote>
<p>this isn’t random or the cia this is the sinclair broadcasting group which pushes right-wing news stories after buying local news stations across the united states. Scripts for stories like the one in this video are sent to their local news stations and it is mandatory for them to be broadcast. </p>
<p>I personally know journalists and local broadcasters who have quit their jobs or retired after being bought out by sinclair because they know they’ll be forced to do this shit</p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-embed tmblr-full" data-provider="youtube" data-orig-width="540" data-orig-height="304" data-url="https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DGvtNyOzGogc"><iframe width="540" height="304" id="youtube_iframe" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GvtNyOzGogc?feature=oembed&amp;enablejsapi=1&amp;origin=https://safe.txmblr.com&amp;wmode=opaque" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></figure><p>This does a pretty good job explaining why news outlets are like that. Really worth the watch!</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stations_owned_or_operated_by_Sinclair_Broadcast_Group"><b>List of stations owned or operated by Sinclair </b></a></h2>
</blockquote>
<p>Okay but the video above is extremely helpful, just in case anyone wanted a second opinion on it. </p></blockquote>

<p>&gt;John Oliver </p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="266" data-orig-width="474"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/19d6afc9c6520549ab2e69d6dec2d01b/tumblr_inline_p6oz17lRH31rw09tq_500.gif" data-orig-height="266" data-orig-width="474"/></figure>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
<p><a href="https://badshit-kid-art.tumblr.com/post/172609087216/tzikeh-sugarpineone-erwinisbi" class="tumblr_blog">badshit-kid-art</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://tzikeh.tumblr.com/post/172525974303/sugarpineone-erwinisbi-pinetreeanarchism" class="tumblr_blog">tzikeh</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://sugarpineone.tumblr.com/post/172482938914/erwinisbi-pinetreeanarchism-arirosie" class="tumblr_blog">sugarpineone</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://erwinisbi.tumblr.com/post/172473506669/pinetreeanarchism-arirosie" class="tumblr_blog">erwinisbi</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pinetreeanarchism.tumblr.com/post/172470103382/arirosie-friendly-neighborhood-patriarch" class="tumblr_blog">pinetreeanarchism</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://arirosie.tumblr.com/post/172466881265/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch-pennamites" class="tumblr_blog">arirosie</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/172466565062/pennamites-castle-engineer" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pennamites.tumblr.com/post/172466056952/castle-engineer-diarrheaworldstarhiphop" class="tumblr_blog">pennamites</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://castle-engineer.tumblr.com/post/172465935569/diarrheaworldstarhiphop-this-is-one-of-those" class="tumblr_blog">castle-engineer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://diarrheaworldstarhiphop.tumblr.com/post/172465577419" class="tumblr_blog">diarrheaworldstarhiphop</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/f5009587c75dfb2af3a5127ccb865f6a/tumblr_inline_p6hh0fW1OV1qg6gjx_540.png" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CIA is getting lazy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>O.o</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It is really creepy how they all have the same freaking script </p>
</blockquote>

<p>What the fuck</p>
</blockquote>
<p>this isn’t random or the cia this is the sinclair broadcasting group which pushes right-wing news stories after buying local news stations across the united states. Scripts for stories like the one in this video are sent to their local news stations and it is mandatory for them to be broadcast. </p>
<p>I personally know journalists and local broadcasters who have quit their jobs or retired after being bought out by sinclair because they know they’ll be forced to do this shit</p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-embed tmblr-full" data-provider="youtube" data-orig-width="540" data-orig-height="304" data-url="https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DGvtNyOzGogc"><iframe width="540" height="304" id="youtube_iframe" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GvtNyOzGogc?feature=oembed&amp;enablejsapi=1&amp;origin=https://safe.txmblr.com&amp;wmode=opaque" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></figure><p>This does a pretty good job explaining why news outlets are like that. Really worth the watch!</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stations_owned_or_operated_by_Sinclair_Broadcast_Group"><b>List of stations owned or operated by Sinclair </b></a></h2>
</blockquote>
<p>Okay but the video above is extremely helpful, just in case anyone wanted a second opinion on it. </p></blockquote>

<p>&gt;John Oliver </p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="266" data-orig-width="474"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/19d6afc9c6520549ab2e69d6dec2d01b/tumblr_inline_p6oz17lRH31rw09tq_500.gif" data-orig-height="266" data-orig-width="474"/></figure>
                
                

                
            

            
            
<p><a href="https://badshit-kid-art.tumblr.com/post/172609087216/tzikeh-sugarpineone-erwinisbi" class="tumblr_blog">badshit-kid-art</a>:<...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
<p><a href="http://waitingforgalois.tumblr.com/post/172602028139/hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">waitingforgalois</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://hello-kitty-senpai.tumblr.com/post/172468162052/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch-pennamites" class="tumblr_blog">hello-kitty-senpai</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/172466565062/pennamites-castle-engineer" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pennamites.tumblr.com/post/172466056952/castle-engineer-diarrheaworldstarhiphop" class="tumblr_blog">pennamites</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://castle-engineer.tumblr.com/post/172465935569/diarrheaworldstarhiphop-this-is-one-of-those" class="tumblr_blog">castle-engineer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://diarrheaworldstarhiphop.tumblr.com/post/172465577419" class="tumblr_blog">diarrheaworldstarhiphop</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/f5009587c75dfb2af3a5127ccb865f6a/tumblr_inline_p6hh0fW1OV1qg6gjx_540.png" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CIA is getting lazy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>O.o</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” <br/><br/>The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hey so this is actually an inaccurate thing. These are all (or at least mostly) local stations, owned by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group">Sinclair Broadcast Group</a>, the largest television station operator in the country. </p><p>They have a very conservative and especially pro-trump slant, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/02/business/media/sinclair-news-anchors-script.html">and they sent out this script to every news</a> station they own as a “must run” segment. Meaning that if a station didn’t run it, a<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/03/opinions/sinclair-anchors-scripted-comments-greenhouse/index.html"> lot of those people would be out of a jo</a>b. <a href="https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/04/sinclair-employees-filmed-that-dystopian-trump-pro.html">A lot of reporters for these local stations have anonymously voiced their disgust with it, but they have been largely fucked over and can’t do anything about it</a></p><p>This is actually an attempt at trying to get americans to actively distrust major news networks like the National Fox News, CNN, etc., so that more viewers will tune into their local stations which are run by Sinclair. </p><p>Don’t fall for this, quit trusting reactionary posts on tumblr especially after the last couple weeks/months/years.</p></blockquote>

<p>Fall for what? What you described is pretty much exactly what’s happening and exactly what people are saying is happening. Are you actually suggesting that national news networks are more trustworthy than local ones? Have you considered that they’re *both* propaganda bullshit?</p>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
<p><a href="http://waitingforgalois.tumblr.com/post/172602028139/hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">waitingforgalois</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://hello-kitty-senpai.tumblr.com/post/172468162052/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch-pennamites" class="tumblr_blog">hello-kitty-senpai</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/172466565062/pennamites-castle-engineer" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pennamites.tumblr.com/post/172466056952/castle-engineer-diarrheaworldstarhiphop" class="tumblr_blog">pennamites</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://castle-engineer.tumblr.com/post/172465935569/diarrheaworldstarhiphop-this-is-one-of-those" class="tumblr_blog">castle-engineer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://diarrheaworldstarhiphop.tumblr.com/post/172465577419" class="tumblr_blog">diarrheaworldstarhiphop</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/f5009587c75dfb2af3a5127ccb865f6a/tumblr_inline_p6hh0fW1OV1qg6gjx_540.png" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CIA is getting lazy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>O.o</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” <br/><br/>The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hey so this is actually an inaccurate thing. These are all (or at least mostly) local stations, owned by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group">Sinclair Broadcast Group</a>, the largest television station operator in the country. </p><p>They have a very conservative and especially pro-trump slant, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/02/business/media/sinclair-news-anchors-script.html">and they sent out this script to every news</a> station they own as a “must run” segment. Meaning that if a station didn’t run it, a<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/03/opinions/sinclair-anchors-scripted-comments-greenhouse/index.html"> lot of those people would be out of a jo</a>b. <a href="https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/04/sinclair-employees-filmed-that-dystopian-trump-pro.html">A lot of reporters for these local stations have anonymously voiced their disgust with it, but they have been largely fucked over and can’t do anything about it</a></p><p>This is actually an attempt at trying to get americans to actively distrust major news networks like the National Fox News, CNN, etc., so that more viewers will tune into their local stations which are run by Sinclair. </p><p>Don’t fall for this, quit trusting reactionary posts on tumblr especially after the last couple weeks/months/years.</p></blockquote>

<p>Fall for what? What you described is pretty much exactly what’s happening and exactly what people are saying is happening. Are you actually suggesting that national news networks are more trustworthy than local ones? Have you considered that they’re *both* propaganda bullshit?</p>
                
                

                
            

            
            
<p><a href="http://waitingforgalois.tumblr.com/post/172602028139/hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">waitingforgalois</a>:</p>

<bloc...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
<p><a href="http://kushonthecoast.tumblr.com/post/172485299672/rtrixie-libby-day-hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">kushonthecoast</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://rtrixie.tumblr.com/post/172482025004/libby-day-hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">rtrixie</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://murphy.co.vu/post/172473410956/hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">libby-day</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://hello-kitty-senpai.tumblr.com/post/172468162052/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch-pennamites" class="tumblr_blog">hello-kitty-senpai</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/172466565062/pennamites-castle-engineer" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pennamites.tumblr.com/post/172466056952/castle-engineer-diarrheaworldstarhiphop" class="tumblr_blog">pennamites</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://castle-engineer.tumblr.com/post/172465935569/diarrheaworldstarhiphop-this-is-one-of-those" class="tumblr_blog">castle-engineer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://diarrheaworldstarhiphop.tumblr.com/post/172465577419" class="tumblr_blog">diarrheaworldstarhiphop</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/f5009587c75dfb2af3a5127ccb865f6a/tumblr_inline_p6hh0fW1OV1qg6gjx_540.png" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CIA is getting lazy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>O.o</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” <br/><br/>The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>i’m straight up gonna have nightmares of this hive of newspeople repeating ‘this is extremely dangerous to our democracy’</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If anybody asks what we’re fighting against, show them this video.</p>
</blockquote>

<h1>1984198419841984</h1>
</blockquote>
<p>IT GETS WORSE.</p><p>Sinclair Broadcasting Group, The company behind the script, is lobbying the government to take control of EVEN MORE stations. If they get their way they will have one of their stations in nearly every home in America. And the contract most of these anchors are locked into makes it pretty much impossible or at the very least very expensive and career-destroying for them to refuse to read the scripts. </p><p>This is a broadcasting network with unchecked control over exactly what it said on private broadcasting stations. They were likely taking advantage of the innate trust most people have for their local news anchors. National news might not be trustworthy but surely you can trust your friendly local anchors right? Wrong. You are being fed exactly what a much larger government sanctioned entity wants you to know, and if it doesn’t terrify you, it should.</p>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 548
 FOX 29
 News at Nine
 FOX 29
 CURRENTS
 SAN ANTONIO
 71°
 JESSICA HEAD
 LEY
 71°
 KERRVILLE
 69°
 TEXASAL CASE ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY ON A WATE
 SPORTS NHL DETROIT
 2
 MONTREAL
 CARARIN SI
<p><a href="http://kushonthecoast.tumblr.com/post/172485299672/rtrixie-libby-day-hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">kushonthecoast</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://rtrixie.tumblr.com/post/172482025004/libby-day-hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">rtrixie</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://murphy.co.vu/post/172473410956/hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">libby-day</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://hello-kitty-senpai.tumblr.com/post/172468162052/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch-pennamites" class="tumblr_blog">hello-kitty-senpai</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/172466565062/pennamites-castle-engineer" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pennamites.tumblr.com/post/172466056952/castle-engineer-diarrheaworldstarhiphop" class="tumblr_blog">pennamites</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://castle-engineer.tumblr.com/post/172465935569/diarrheaworldstarhiphop-this-is-one-of-those" class="tumblr_blog">castle-engineer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://diarrheaworldstarhiphop.tumblr.com/post/172465577419" class="tumblr_blog">diarrheaworldstarhiphop</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/f5009587c75dfb2af3a5127ccb865f6a/tumblr_inline_p6hh0fW1OV1qg6gjx_540.png" data-orig-height="109" data-orig-width="578"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>This is one of those things that I already knew was true, but seeing it so blatantly displayed makes me feel like like I am finding out about it for the first time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CIA is getting lazy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>O.o</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“It’s just a script whats the problem lol” the problem is that Fox, CNN, CBS, and all the other channels repped here, despite claiming to be different companies with different viewpoints, all had the exact same script, word for word, to push the exact same viewpoint that smaller, independent news outlets are Fake News and “A Threat To Our Democracy.” <br/><br/>The fact that they have scripts isn’t the problem. The problem is they all, each and every one, have the exact same script down to the letter and in some cases the fucking inflection, which basically reads “small news stations are untrustworthy and a Threat to your Way Of Life, only trust Us, We Are Verified.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>i’m straight up gonna have nightmares of this hive of newspeople repeating ‘this is extremely dangerous to our democracy’</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If anybody asks what we’re fighting against, show them this video.</p>
</blockquote>

<h1>1984198419841984</h1>
</blockquote>
<p>IT GETS WORSE.</p><p>Sinclair Broadcasting Group, The company behind the script, is lobbying the government to take control of EVEN MORE stations. If they get their way they will have one of their stations in nearly every home in America. And the contract most of these anchors are locked into makes it pretty much impossible or at the very least very expensive and career-destroying for them to refuse to read the scripts. </p><p>This is a broadcasting network with unchecked control over exactly what it said on private broadcasting stations. They were likely taking advantage of the innate trust most people have for their local news anchors. National news might not be trustworthy but surely you can trust your friendly local anchors right? Wrong. You are being fed exactly what a much larger government sanctioned entity wants you to know, and if it doesn’t terrify you, it should.</p>
                
                

                
            

            
            
<p><a href="http://kushonthecoast.tumblr.com/post/172485299672/rtrixie-libby-day-hello-kitty-senpai" class="tumblr_blog">kushonthecoast</...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: Christian Day
 6:15pm
 LOL!
 I hope your stalker has some fun with you
 bye bye now
 Trust me. "pudgy" hovers around the upper surface of how deep my
 words can cut.
 You couldn't curse me if you tried. LOL
 All of you and your keyboard warrior friends together wouldn't be able to
 make a dent in what I do.
 Oh, and by the way, if he rapes you, please call out my name while he
 does
 Cheerio
<p><a href="https://magickinmundane.tumblr.com/post/169763653301/madamehearthwitch" class="tumblr_blog">magickinmundane</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://madamehearthwitch.tumblr.com/post/167512785246/althoughiknowitsstrictlytaboo" class="tumblr_blog">madamehearthwitch</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://althoughiknowitsstrictlytaboo.tumblr.com/post/167509574380/queer-witchery-poppy-finch" class="tumblr_blog">althoughiknowitsstrictlytaboo</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://queer-witchery.tumblr.com/post/143943748987/poppy-finch-decayfeedsthebloom" class="tumblr_blog">queer-witchery</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://poppy-finch.tumblr.com/post/143941146925/decayfeedsthebloom-eclecticwitcheryafoot" class="tumblr_blog">poppy-finch</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://decayfeedsthebloom.tumblr.com/post/143940342377">decayfeedsthebloom</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/143924171285">eclecticwitcheryafoot</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/97728817460">eclecticwitcheryafoot</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-beauty-of-the-moon.tumblr.com/post/97725600883">the-beauty-of-the-moon</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://bodaciousbanshee.tumblr.com/post/96665360747">bodaciousbanshee</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://amorellamoon.tumblr.com/post/96578428283">amorellamoon</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>So this is a thing that happened…</p>
<p>Christian Day, a pagan writer and store owner, sent me this love letter after outing my account name on Facebook. Like many people who have an alias on facebook,<span></span><span> I have a rather good reason for doing so. (I have a Meatspace stalker, who use to mail me bits of dead things, and threaten my children, because he wanted me to bear only HIS </span>children<span>. It was a living nightmare that I lived for over six months.) Alas… I was not very happy with Mr. Day for this, and told him so.</span></p>
<p><span>This screenshot shows his </span>response<span>. </span></p>
<p>You are not misreading that. He actually said “…if he rapes you, please call out my name while he does.”</p>
<p>Facebook has been less than helpful during all this… As a matter of fact, they have sided with HIM, yanking my post with this screenshot on it, and putting my account on a 24 hour hold for “Harassment.” of Mr. Day.</p>
<p>I have… No real game plan at this point, other than not allowing this to go unseen by the many Pagans on the web. I have had such an outpouring of support from my friends and the general pagan community on facebook that it honestly made me cry. On another note, I have had to un-relax, knowing my stalker is still out there and can find me now. But, I will not back down. This shit IS NOT OK for our so called “Pagan Leaders” to do.</p>
<p>Rock on my Beauties… Pass this along if you wish, repost it everywhere, and let us not allow this “Man” to have a moment peace until he answers for what he has done. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dear followers, please reblog this. I want it to spread like wildfire. This guy is a real “Big Name Pagan” a famous published author, and he spent months bullying, harassing and threatening my godmother and her daughter over facebook. He owns a franchise shop here in New Orleans, and has systematically been trying to sow seeds of distention among local witches and their shops in order to cripple competition. He’s blatantly (racistly) disrespected our local Voodoo community on the radio saying that you shouldn’t have to go to Haiti to get initiated because it’s a “dirty place”. If you see his so-called “apology” don’t buy the hype. <span>He is openly sexist, racist and classicist. </span><span>This is not the first time he’s done something like this, he is not sorry. He needs to be held responsible for his actions. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is fucking sick.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://foresthoney.tumblr.com/post/97727078907/the-beauty-of-the-moon-bodaciousbanshee">foresthoney</a>:</p>


<div>He owns two shops, Hex and Omen. HEX is in both Salem, MA and New Orleans, LA and Omen is just in Salem, MA. Avoid him like the plague he is and don’t let him or the people he associates with profit off you (they, Laurie Cabot groupies, own shops in Salem too).</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Christian’s at it again.</p>
<p>He threatened to kill a nearby shop owner’s dog (Pumpkin from New England Magic who is ADORABLE) a few years ago out of a nasty feud with the owner, who is SO SWEET!  Of course he denied it.</p>
<p>His boyfriend Brian is just as sick when it comes to people who support Lori Bruno (that fucking feud…oh my GOD.  Don’t even get me STARTED on that).</p>
<p>Now…this.</p>
<p>He’s a media whore…He actually said this to me. He has no problem admitting this to me.  He knows how to cause controversy because “Well, bad publicity is still publicity…The Wicked Witch will still fly!”</p>
<p>This is why I can’t stand Salem now.  This sick bullshit.</p>
<p>Seriously, avoid Crow Haven Corner (my experience with this place written about <a href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/92356759535/for-those-who-wish-to-travel-to-salem-ma-and-visit-the">here</a>), Hex, Omen, and Enchanted (my experience written about <a href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/92396544385/my-personal-rant-about-enchanted-a-magickal-shop">here</a>)  They’re all closely linked with one another because of their relationships with Laurie Cabot.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bringing this back as a reminder</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yuck. What a vile creature.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Signal boost like hell!<br/><br/>We need to hold dangerous and shitty members of our community accountable for their actions.  This asshole is actively putting people and their loved ones in danger for no other reason than he can.<br/><br/>Spread the word if you can stand to have this on your blog (no judgment).  Speak out against people buying his books or patronizing his shops.  Don’t let him get away with this kind of behavior.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>this is disgusting holy shit</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So disgusting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The fuuuuuuck?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Signal boost!</p>
</blockquote>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: Christian Day
 6:15pm
 LOL!
 I hope your stalker has some fun with you
 bye bye now
 Trust me. "pudgy" hovers around the upper surface of how deep my
 words can cut.
 You couldn't curse me if you tried. LOL
 All of you and your keyboard warrior friends together wouldn't be able to
 make a dent in what I do.
 Oh, and by the way, if he rapes you, please call out my name while he
 does
 Cheerio
<p><a href="https://magickinmundane.tumblr.com/post/169763653301/madamehearthwitch" class="tumblr_blog">magickinmundane</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://madamehearthwitch.tumblr.com/post/167512785246/althoughiknowitsstrictlytaboo" class="tumblr_blog">madamehearthwitch</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://althoughiknowitsstrictlytaboo.tumblr.com/post/167509574380/queer-witchery-poppy-finch" class="tumblr_blog">althoughiknowitsstrictlytaboo</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://queer-witchery.tumblr.com/post/143943748987/poppy-finch-decayfeedsthebloom" class="tumblr_blog">queer-witchery</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://poppy-finch.tumblr.com/post/143941146925/decayfeedsthebloom-eclecticwitcheryafoot" class="tumblr_blog">poppy-finch</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://decayfeedsthebloom.tumblr.com/post/143940342377">decayfeedsthebloom</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/143924171285">eclecticwitcheryafoot</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/97728817460">eclecticwitcheryafoot</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-beauty-of-the-moon.tumblr.com/post/97725600883">the-beauty-of-the-moon</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://bodaciousbanshee.tumblr.com/post/96665360747">bodaciousbanshee</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://amorellamoon.tumblr.com/post/96578428283">amorellamoon</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>So this is a thing that happened…</p>
<p>Christian Day, a pagan writer and store owner, sent me this love letter after outing my account name on Facebook. Like many people who have an alias on facebook,<span></span><span> I have a rather good reason for doing so. (I have a Meatspace stalker, who use to mail me bits of dead things, and threaten my children, because he wanted me to bear only HIS </span>children<span>. It was a living nightmare that I lived for over six months.) Alas… I was not very happy with Mr. Day for this, and told him so.</span></p>
<p><span>This screenshot shows his </span>response<span>. </span></p>
<p>You are not misreading that. He actually said “…if he rapes you, please call out my name while he does.”</p>
<p>Facebook has been less than helpful during all this… As a matter of fact, they have sided with HIM, yanking my post with this screenshot on it, and putting my account on a 24 hour hold for “Harassment.” of Mr. Day.</p>
<p>I have… No real game plan at this point, other than not allowing this to go unseen by the many Pagans on the web. I have had such an outpouring of support from my friends and the general pagan community on facebook that it honestly made me cry. On another note, I have had to un-relax, knowing my stalker is still out there and can find me now. But, I will not back down. This shit IS NOT OK for our so called “Pagan Leaders” to do.</p>
<p>Rock on my Beauties… Pass this along if you wish, repost it everywhere, and let us not allow this “Man” to have a moment peace until he answers for what he has done. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dear followers, please reblog this. I want it to spread like wildfire. This guy is a real “Big Name Pagan” a famous published author, and he spent months bullying, harassing and threatening my godmother and her daughter over facebook. He owns a franchise shop here in New Orleans, and has systematically been trying to sow seeds of distention among local witches and their shops in order to cripple competition. He’s blatantly (racistly) disrespected our local Voodoo community on the radio saying that you shouldn’t have to go to Haiti to get initiated because it’s a “dirty place”. If you see his so-called “apology” don’t buy the hype. <span>He is openly sexist, racist and classicist. </span><span>This is not the first time he’s done something like this, he is not sorry. He needs to be held responsible for his actions. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is fucking sick.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://foresthoney.tumblr.com/post/97727078907/the-beauty-of-the-moon-bodaciousbanshee">foresthoney</a>:</p>


<div>He owns two shops, Hex and Omen. HEX is in both Salem, MA and New Orleans, LA and Omen is just in Salem, MA. Avoid him like the plague he is and don’t let him or the people he associates with profit off you (they, Laurie Cabot groupies, own shops in Salem too).</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Christian’s at it again.</p>
<p>He threatened to kill a nearby shop owner’s dog (Pumpkin from New England Magic who is ADORABLE) a few years ago out of a nasty feud with the owner, who is SO SWEET!  Of course he denied it.</p>
<p>His boyfriend Brian is just as sick when it comes to people who support Lori Bruno (that fucking feud…oh my GOD.  Don’t even get me STARTED on that).</p>
<p>Now…this.</p>
<p>He’s a media whore…He actually said this to me. He has no problem admitting this to me.  He knows how to cause controversy because “Well, bad publicity is still publicity…The Wicked Witch will still fly!”</p>
<p>This is why I can’t stand Salem now.  This sick bullshit.</p>
<p>Seriously, avoid Crow Haven Corner (my experience with this place written about <a href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/92356759535/for-those-who-wish-to-travel-to-salem-ma-and-visit-the">here</a>), Hex, Omen, and Enchanted (my experience written about <a href="http://eclecticwitcheryafoot.tumblr.com/post/92396544385/my-personal-rant-about-enchanted-a-magickal-shop">here</a>)  They’re all closely linked with one another because of their relationships with Laurie Cabot.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bringing this back as a reminder</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yuck. What a vile creature.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Signal boost like hell!<br/><br/>We need to hold dangerous and shitty members of our community accountable for their actions.  This asshole is actively putting people and their loved ones in danger for no other reason than he can.<br/><br/>Spread the word if you can stand to have this on your blog (no judgment).  Speak out against people buying his books or patronizing his shops.  Don’t let him get away with this kind of behavior.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>this is disgusting holy shit</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So disgusting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The fuuuuuuck?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Signal boost!</p>
</blockquote>
                
            

            
            
<p><a href="https://magickinmundane.tumblr.com/post/169763653301/madamehearthwitch" class="tumblr_blog">magickinmundane</a>:</p><blockquo...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: T. Lee
 @curvegawdess
 Following
 This is kinda the most ridiculous thing
 I've ever seen.
 WHY WASNT THERE ANY LIGHTER
 SKIN BLACK WOMEN IN WAKANDA?
 CHICAGO
 DC
 A.
 7:26 AM-24 Feb 2018 from Florida, USA
 1,601 Retweets 4,436 Likes

 Alice.
 @CoffeeCreamGirl
 Follow
 Well to answer the question, Wakanda
 was uncolonized meaning there were no
 slaves being raped by owners to create
 light skinned citizens. Dark people
 reproducing with each other creates
 more Dark people usually, any other
 questions or can we enjoy the movie in
 peace now?
 T. Lee @curvegawdess
 This is kinda the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.
 Show this thread
 11:30 AM-24 Feb 2018
 958 Retweets 15,281 Likes

 Alice.
 @CoffeeCreamGirl
 Follow
 I said the word usually for inclusion of
 things like genetic mutations and
 diicereni geographic: clirns. Period
 point blank it'd be a rarity it's not
 suppose to blatantly stand out
 5:00 PM- 24 Feb 2018
<p><a href="https://whyyoustabbedme.tumblr.com/post/171275993402/lets-not-forget-that-lighter-people-arealways" class="tumblr_blog">whyyoustabbedme</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>Let’s not forget that lighter people are/always have had more representation in movies so there’s really no reason to be pressed.</p><figure data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="272"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ccc524a144963cb5e5877e21a6b1a934/tumblr_inline_p4pumamigq1vrw6x9_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="272"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>Is anyone on earth capable of just enjoying things anymore?</p>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: T. Lee
 @curvegawdess
 Following
 This is kinda the most ridiculous thing
 I've ever seen.
 WHY WASNT THERE ANY LIGHTER
 SKIN BLACK WOMEN IN WAKANDA?
 CHICAGO
 DC
 A.
 7:26 AM-24 Feb 2018 from Florida, USA
 1,601 Retweets 4,436 Likes

 Alice.
 @CoffeeCreamGirl
 Follow
 Well to answer the question, Wakanda
 was uncolonized meaning there were no
 slaves being raped by owners to create
 light skinned citizens. Dark people
 reproducing with each other creates
 more Dark people usually, any other
 questions or can we enjoy the movie in
 peace now?
 T. Lee @curvegawdess
 This is kinda the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.
 Show this thread
 11:30 AM-24 Feb 2018
 958 Retweets 15,281 Likes

 Alice.
 @CoffeeCreamGirl
 Follow
 I said the word usually for inclusion of
 things like genetic mutations and
 diicereni geographic: clirns. Period
 point blank it'd be a rarity it's not
 suppose to blatantly stand out
 5:00 PM- 24 Feb 2018
<p><a href="https://whyyoustabbedme.tumblr.com/post/171275993402/lets-not-forget-that-lighter-people-arealways" class="tumblr_blog">whyyoustabbedme</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>Let’s not forget that lighter people are/always have had more representation in movies so there’s really no reason to be pressed.</p><figure data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="272"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ccc524a144963cb5e5877e21a6b1a934/tumblr_inline_p4pumamigq1vrw6x9_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="272"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>Is anyone on earth capable of just enjoying things anymore?</p>
                
            

            
            
<p><a href="https://whyyoustabbedme.tumblr.com/post/171275993402/lets-not-forget-that-lighter-people-arealways" class="tumblr_blog">whyyo...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
<p><a href="http://gvldngrl.tumblr.com/post/166513263494/wolfoverdose-rikodeine-seemeflow-because" class="tumblr_blog">gvldngrl</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://wolfoverdose.tumblr.com/post/166265395771/rikodeine-seemeflow-because-of-the-fifth" class="tumblr_blog">wolfoverdose</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rikodeine.tumblr.com/post/131562629300">rikodeine</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://seemeflow.tumblr.com/post/131556627065">seemeflow</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.</b></p>
<p><b>1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”</b><br/>Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.</p>
<p><b>2) “Do you have something to hide?”</b><br/>Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.</p>
<p><b>3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”</b><br/>The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”<br/>(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)</p>
<p><b>4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”</b><br/>Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.</p>
<p><b>5.) We have someone who will testify against you</b><br/>Police “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.</p>
<p><b>6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”</b><br/>Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.</p>
<p><b>7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”</b><br/>Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.</p>
<p>U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).</p>
<p>Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.</p>
<p>Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want">http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want</a><br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Important </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.</p>
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
<p><a href="http://gvldngrl.tumblr.com/post/166513263494/wolfoverdose-rikodeine-seemeflow-because" class="tumblr_blog">gvldngrl</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://wolfoverdose.tumblr.com/post/166265395771/rikodeine-seemeflow-because-of-the-fifth" class="tumblr_blog">wolfoverdose</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rikodeine.tumblr.com/post/131562629300">rikodeine</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://seemeflow.tumblr.com/post/131556627065">seemeflow</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.</b></p>
<p><b>1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”</b><br/>Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.</p>
<p><b>2) “Do you have something to hide?”</b><br/>Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.</p>
<p><b>3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”</b><br/>The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”<br/>(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)</p>
<p><b>4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”</b><br/>Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.</p>
<p><b>5.) We have someone who will testify against you</b><br/>Police “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.</p>
<p><b>6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”</b><br/>Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.</p>
<p><b>7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”</b><br/>Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.</p>
<p>U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).</p>
<p>Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.</p>
<p>Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want">http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want</a><br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Important </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.</p>
                
            

            
            
<p><a href="http://gvldngrl.tumblr.com/post/166513263494/wolfoverdose-rikodeine-seemeflow-because" class="tumblr_blog">gvldngrl</a>:</p><...

            
            
        

    



        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            






        

        
        

            







    Blatantly: Quincy Jones Admits to Having 22
 Girlfriends, Says They All Know of
 Each Other
 @balleralert
Quincy Jones Admits to Having 22 Girlfriends, Says They All Know of Each Other - blogged by: @ashleytearra ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ After three marriages, QuincyJones is sure that he’s done with the faithful life. In fact, the divorcee has 22 girlfriends to prove it. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ In an interview with GQ Magazine, the 84-year-old entertainment mogul opened up about his love life, and none of us were mentally prepared for what he had to say. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “I got twenty-two girlfriends,” he chuckles. “I was married three times, man. Was told not to marry actresses or singers. I ended up with two actresses—Peggy Lipton and Nastassja Kinski, and a superstar model. I didn’t listen to all the advice.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ However—despite his marital past, Jones doesn’t have any plans to tie the knot again anytime soon, especially since it’d be extremely hard to narrow down such a high number of girlfriends to just one wife, right? We’d imagine so. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ When asked if he was serious about having 22 lovers, Jones blatantly says, “Hell yeah. Everywhere. Cape Town. Cairo. Stockholm-she’s coming in next week. Brazil-Belo Horizonte, São Paulo, and Rio. Shanghai, [I’ve] got a great girl over there, too, man.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Surprisingly, all of the women know of each other, as Jones proudly admits that “he doesn’t lie.” And, allegedly, most of them are between the ages of 28 and 42. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ So, when the question came up about if he’d ever date someone around his age, Jones was quick to shut that down. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “Are you crazy?” He gives the interviewer a startled look. “For what, man? There’s nothing; there’s no upside. You gotta be kidding. I got me some technology out there that keeps [the] fat and old away from here. [It] buzzes if they’re too old. But, you’d be surprised. These women, the young ones, are aggressive now. Oh my God, they’re fearless, man. All over the world.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ As you can see, Mr. Jones is still a rolling stone, even in his old age.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Blatantly: Quincy Jones Admits to Having 22
 Girlfriends, Says They All Know of
 Each Other
 @balleralert
Quincy Jones Admits to Having 22 Girlfriends, Says They All Know of Each Other - blogged by: @ashleytearra ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ After three marriages, QuincyJones is sure that he’s done with the faithful life. In fact, the divorcee has 22 girlfriends to prove it. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ In an interview with GQ Magazine, the 84-year-old entertainment mogul opened up about his love life, and none of us were mentally prepared for what he had to say. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “I got twenty-two girlfriends,” he chuckles. “I was married three times, man. Was told not to marry actresses or singers. I ended up with two actresses—Peggy Lipton and Nastassja Kinski, and a superstar model. I didn’t listen to all the advice.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ However—despite his marital past, Jones doesn’t have any plans to tie the knot again anytime soon, especially since it’d be extremely hard to narrow down such a high number of girlfriends to just one wife, right? We’d imagine so. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ When asked if he was serious about having 22 lovers, Jones blatantly says, “Hell yeah. Everywhere. Cape Town. Cairo. Stockholm-she’s coming in next week. Brazil-Belo Horizonte, São Paulo, and Rio. Shanghai, [I’ve] got a great girl over there, too, man.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Surprisingly, all of the women know of each other, as Jones proudly admits that “he doesn’t lie.” And, allegedly, most of them are between the ages of 28 and 42. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ So, when the question came up about if he’d ever date someone around his age, Jones was quick to shut that down. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “Are you crazy?” He gives the interviewer a startled look. “For what, man? There’s nothing; there’s no upside. You gotta be kidding. I got me some technology out there that keeps [the] fat and old away from here. [It] buzzes if they’re too old. But, you’d be surprised. These women, the young ones, are aggressive now. Oh my God, they’re fearless, man. All over the world.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ As you can see, Mr. Jones is still a rolling stone, even in his old age.
                
            

            
            
Quincy Jones Admits to Having 22 Girlfriends, Says They All Know of Each Other - blogged by: @ashleytearra ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ After three ma...