🔥 | Latest

Facebook, Instagram, and Internet: MAKE Early Golden age meme (pinwheel background Impact Text) MORE MEMES MAKE Golden Age memes use specific photos which have specific memetic "translations of Late Golden age (Just Photo, Impact Text) Transitional meme (Photo from tumblr, instagram, twitter or facebook, with an accompanying text, often added just for emphasis) At the transitional stage, memes here include "reactions" that encourage the reader into what it means or how it is 1'm sure this means something, but don ask me what dog When you show your mom a pic on your phone and she starts swiping Silver Age meme When Back to School commercials start coming on but you're not a teacher or a kid so you don't give a shit (photo with text in arial-design is reminiscent of a twitter post) At this age, the photo is the supplement rather than the defining characteristic. The text, rather than the photo, provides meaning. UBER eats New Age meme (Photos only, very little text) At this age, the meme no longer requires text for definitive suppliment. The meaning is expressed by memetic definition and The photos are self-explanatoriy and the meaning is expressed by multiple connected frames. Text, if used, gives context only Are you smart? Spelit Late Stage meme (nuked memes, deep fried memes, surreal memes These are not meant to pass on memetic meaning, but instead are entirely based on absurd and contextual humor They are often not made to communicate thought. No only be on ou ust I am currently studying memes academically. I thought you might enjoy the current proposed ages of internet memes via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2L5D3XW
Facebook, Instagram, and Internet: MAKE
 Early
 Golden age
 meme
 (pinwheel background
 Impact Text)
 MORE MEMES
 MAKE
 Golden Age memes use specific
 photos which have specific
 memetic "translations of
 Late
 Golden age
 (Just Photo, Impact
 Text)
 Transitional
 meme
 (Photo from tumblr,
 instagram, twitter or
 facebook, with an
 accompanying text,
 often added just for
 emphasis)
 At the transitional stage,
 memes here include "reactions"
 that encourage the reader into
 what it means or how it is
 1'm sure this means something, but don ask me what
 dog
 When you show your mom a pic on
 your phone and she starts swiping
 Silver Age
 meme
 When Back to School commercials start
 coming on but you're not a teacher or a
 kid so you don't give a shit
 (photo with text in
 arial-design is
 reminiscent of a twitter
 post)
 At this age, the photo is the
 supplement rather than the
 defining characteristic. The
 text, rather than the photo,
 provides meaning.
 UBER
 eats
 New Age
 meme
 (Photos only, very little
 text)
 At this age, the meme no
 longer requires text for
 definitive suppliment. The
 meaning is expressed by
 memetic definition and
 The photos are
 self-explanatoriy and the
 meaning is expressed by
 multiple connected frames.
 Text, if used, gives context
 only
 Are you smart? Spelit
 Late Stage
 meme
 (nuked memes, deep
 fried memes, surreal
 memes
 These are not meant to pass
 on memetic meaning, but
 instead are entirely based on
 absurd and contextual humor
 They are often not made to
 communicate thought.
 No
 only be
 on
 ou
 ust
I am currently studying memes academically. I thought you might enjoy the current proposed ages of internet memes via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2L5D3XW

I am currently studying memes academically. I thought you might enjoy the current proposed ages of internet memes via /r/memes https://ift.t...

Dude, Ironic, and Money: erin i you literally are a billionaire literally it is not ironic in any way Follow you weren't called a billionaire until you were... a billionaire if you think it's is a negative label, maybe it's because it means that you're hoarding money and resources from the rest of the world Elon Musk O Delonmusk Replying to blake,kistler @88CWorld ronically, the "billionaire label, when used by media, is almost always meant to devalue & denigrate the subject. I wasnt called that until my companies got to a certain size, but reality is that I still do the same science & engineeing as before. Just the scale has changed. 0:03 AM-10 Jul 2018 Elon Musk @elonmusk Following Replying to Geehouls No, it means I created jobs for 50,000 people directly and, through parts suppliers & supporting professions, 250,000 people indirectly, thus supporting half a million families. What have you done? 10:12 AM-10 Jul 2018 <p><a href="http://goat-yells-at-everything.tumblr.com/post/175791702726/libertarirynn-and-erin-there-is-a-perfect" class="tumblr_blog">goat-yells-at-everything</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/175791082409" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="280" data-tumblr-attribution="wendywilliamsgifs:gMu_B-ehUbLQbft6mYwVBg:Zn6VAn2F5H4ei"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/afb66cbf4ca5ebfb018b4780256bd5fa/tumblr_oh6qj0cx8U1tfn6k7o1_500.gifv" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="280"/></figure></blockquote> <p>And Erin there is a perfect example of what Musk was talking about in his original tweet.</p> <p>“Billionaire” IS used in a very negative way by a LOT of people. Especially those who don’t realize it doesn’t mean “someone who literally sits on a vault of cash and swims in it like Scrooge McDuck.” Most Billionaires don’t just have money lying around. It’s tied up in a million different kinds of assets including his employee roster.</p> </blockquote><p>Exactly. And I’m surprisingly Hank Green is on his high horse snarking at Musk and offering a creative re-definition of “job creation“</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="785" data-orig-width="750"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ce07c8ec6880c76d43d18140978c281c/tumblr_pbq2563wUL1rw09tq_540.jpg" data-orig-height="785" data-orig-width="750"/></figure><p>Like dude… You are quite literally a job creator if you run a company that has employees. It’s not mutually exclusive with recognizing the contributions of other people, but if all being a billionaire means is literally having over $1 billion, then If you literally create jobs you are literally a Job creator. </p><p>The irony of not seeing “billionaire” used as a slur but then balking at the concept of being called a “job creator” is laughable.</p>
Dude, Ironic, and Money: erin i
 you literally are a billionaire
 literally
 it is not ironic in any way
 Follow
 you weren't called a billionaire until you
 were... a billionaire
 if you think it's is a negative label,
 maybe it's because it means that you're
 hoarding money and resources from the
 rest of the world
 Elon Musk O Delonmusk
 Replying to blake,kistler @88CWorld
 ronically, the "billionaire label, when used by media, is almost always
 meant to devalue & denigrate the subject. I wasnt called that until my
 companies got to a certain size, but reality is that I still do the same science
 & engineeing as before. Just the scale has changed.
 0:03 AM-10 Jul 2018

 Elon Musk
 @elonmusk
 Following
 Replying to Geehouls
 No, it means I created jobs for 50,000 people
 directly and, through parts suppliers &
 supporting professions, 250,000 people
 indirectly, thus supporting half a million
 families. What have you done?
 10:12 AM-10 Jul 2018
<p><a href="http://goat-yells-at-everything.tumblr.com/post/175791702726/libertarirynn-and-erin-there-is-a-perfect" class="tumblr_blog">goat-yells-at-everything</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/175791082409" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>

<blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="280" data-tumblr-attribution="wendywilliamsgifs:gMu_B-ehUbLQbft6mYwVBg:Zn6VAn2F5H4ei"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/afb66cbf4ca5ebfb018b4780256bd5fa/tumblr_oh6qj0cx8U1tfn6k7o1_500.gifv" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="280"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>And Erin there is a perfect example of what Musk was talking about in his original tweet.</p>
<p>“Billionaire” IS used in a very negative way by a LOT of people. Especially those who don’t realize it doesn’t mean “someone who literally sits on a vault of cash and swims in it like Scrooge McDuck.” Most Billionaires don’t just have money lying around. It’s tied up in a million different kinds of assets including his employee roster.</p>
</blockquote><p>Exactly. And I’m surprisingly Hank Green is on his high horse snarking at Musk and offering a creative re-definition of “job creation“</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="785" data-orig-width="750"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ce07c8ec6880c76d43d18140978c281c/tumblr_pbq2563wUL1rw09tq_540.jpg" data-orig-height="785" data-orig-width="750"/></figure><p>Like dude… You are quite literally a job creator if you run a company that has employees. It’s not mutually exclusive with recognizing the contributions of other people, but if all being a billionaire means is literally having over $1 billion, then If you literally create jobs you are literally a Job creator. </p><p>The irony of not seeing “billionaire” used as a slur but then balking at the concept of being called a “job creator” is laughable.</p>

<p><a href="http://goat-yells-at-everything.tumblr.com/post/175791702726/libertarirynn-and-erin-there-is-a-perfect" class="tumblr_blog">goat...

Animals, Bad, and Bones: <p><a href="https://osberend.tumblr.com/post/154339311017/iopele-suspendnodisbelief-naamahdarling" class="tumblr_blog">osberend</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://iopele.tumblr.com/post/139458660302">iopele</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://suspendnodisbelief.tumblr.com/post/135039695690">suspendnodisbelief</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://naamahdarling.tumblr.com/post/134398266796">naamahdarling</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://optimysticals.tumblr.com/post/134385780223">optimysticals</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://youwantmuchmore.tumblr.com/post/127279952598">youwantmuchmore</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://thebestoftumbling.tumblr.com/post/123303726099">thebestoftumbling</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p> golden eagle having a relaxing time <br/></p> </blockquote> <p>This is the world’s largest flying Engine of Murder marveling at the fact that it can actually have its tummy rubbed.</p> </blockquote> <p>I feel like this is the next step up on “loose your fingers” roulette from petting a kittie’s tummy, but just below belly rubs for say a lion.</p> </blockquote> <p>Can someone who knows birds better than I do tell me whether this eagle is as happy as it looks?  Because I want it to be happy.  It looks so happy.  Bewildered by having a friend, but so happy.</p> </blockquote> <p>Just popping on this thread to confirm: yes, the eagle is happy about the belly rubs. Golden eagles make this sound when receiving allopreening and similar affectionate and soothing treatment from their parents and mates. It’s the “I am safe and well fed, and somebody familiar is taking good care of me” sound. Angry raptors and wounded raptors make some pretty dramatic hisses and shrieks; frightened raptors go dead silent and try to hide if they can, or fluff up big and get loud and in-your-face if hiding isn’t an option. They can easily sever a finger or break the bones of a human hand or wrist, and even with a very thick leather falconer’s gauntlet, I’ve known falconers to leave a mews (hawk house) with graphic punctures THROUGH the gauntlet into the meat of their hands and arms, just from buteos and kestrels way smaller than this eagle. A pissed off hawk will make damn sure you don’t try twice whatever you pulled that pissed her off, even if she’s been human-imprinted.</p> <p>If you’re ever unsure about an animal’s level of okayness with something that’s happening, there are three spot-check questions you can ask, to common-sense your way through it:</p> <p>1. Is the animal capable of defending itself or making a threatening or fearful display, or otherwise giving protest, and if so, is it using this ability? (e.g. dog snarling or biting, swan hissing, horse kicking or biting) <br/><br/>2. Does the animal experience an incentive-based relationship with the human? (i.e. does the animal have a reason, in the animal’s frame of reference, for being near this human? e.g. dog sharing companionship / food / shelter, hawk receiving good quality abundant food and shelter and medical care from a falconer)</p> <p>3. Is the animal a domesticated species, with at least a full century of consistent species cohabitation with humans? (Domesticated animals frequently are conditioned from birth or by selective breeding to be unbothered by human actions that upset their feral nearest relatives.)</p> <p>In this situation, YES the eagle can self-defend, YES the eagle has incentive to cooperate with and trust the human handler, and NO the eagle is not a domesticated species, meaning we can expect a high level of reactivity to distress, compared to domestic animals: if the eagle was distressed, it would be pretty visible and apparent to the viewer. These aren’t a universally applicable metric, but they’re a good start for mammal and bird interactions.</p> <p>Pair that with the knowledge that eagles reserve those chirps for calm environments, and you can be pretty secure and comfy in the knowledge that the big honkin’ birb is happy and cozy.</p> <p>Also, to anybody wondering, falconers are almost single-handedly responsible for the recovery from near-extinction of several raptor species, including and especially peregrine falcons. Most hawks only live with the falconer for a year, and most of that year is spent getting the bird in ideal condition for survival and success as a wild breeding adult. Falconers are extensively trained and dedicated wildlife conservationists, pretty much by definition, especially in the continental USA, and they make up an unspeakably important part of the overall conservation of predatory bird species. Predatory birds are an important part of every ecosystem they inhabit. Just like apiarists and their bees, the relationship between falconer and hawk is one of great benefit to the animal and the ecosystem, in exchange for a huge amount of time, effort, expense, and education on the part of the human, for very little personal benefit to that one human. It’s definitely not exploitation of the bird, and most hawks working with falconers are hawks who absolutely would not have reached adulthood without human help: the sick, the injured, and the “runts” of the nest who don’t receive adequate resources from their own parents. These are, by and large, wonderful people who are in love with the natural world and putting a lifetime of knowledge and sheer exhausting <i>work</i> into conserving it and its winged wonders.</p> </blockquote> <p>reblogged for excellent info, I’m so glad that big gorgeous birb really is as happy as it looks!</p> </blockquote> <p>Today’s bit of <a href="http://osberend.tumblr.com/post/152834355142/lately-ive-been-thinking-about-positive-and">positive activism</a>: A reminder that, although the world may contain many bad and awful things, it also contains an enormous winged predator clucking happily as a human gives it a belly rub.<br/></p> </blockquote>
Animals, Bad, and Bones: <p><a href="https://osberend.tumblr.com/post/154339311017/iopele-suspendnodisbelief-naamahdarling" class="tumblr_blog">osberend</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://iopele.tumblr.com/post/139458660302">iopele</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://suspendnodisbelief.tumblr.com/post/135039695690">suspendnodisbelief</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://naamahdarling.tumblr.com/post/134398266796">naamahdarling</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://optimysticals.tumblr.com/post/134385780223">optimysticals</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://youwantmuchmore.tumblr.com/post/127279952598">youwantmuchmore</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://thebestoftumbling.tumblr.com/post/123303726099">thebestoftumbling</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>

golden eagle having a relaxing time

<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is the world’s largest flying Engine of Murder marveling at the fact that it can actually have its tummy rubbed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I feel like this is the next step up on “loose your fingers” roulette from petting a kittie’s tummy, but just below belly rubs for say a lion.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Can someone who knows birds better than I do tell me whether this eagle is as happy as it looks?  Because I want it to be happy.  It looks so happy.  Bewildered by having a friend, but so happy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just popping on this thread to confirm: yes, the eagle is happy about the belly rubs. Golden eagles make this sound when receiving allopreening and similar affectionate and soothing treatment from their parents and mates. It’s the “I am safe and well fed, and somebody familiar is taking good care of me” sound. Angry raptors and wounded raptors make some pretty dramatic hisses and shrieks; frightened raptors go dead silent and try to hide if they can, or fluff up big and get loud and in-your-face if hiding isn’t an option. They can easily sever a finger or break the bones of a human hand or wrist, and even with a very thick leather falconer’s gauntlet, I’ve known falconers to leave a mews (hawk house) with graphic punctures THROUGH the gauntlet into the meat of their hands and arms, just from buteos and kestrels way smaller than this eagle. A pissed off hawk will make damn sure you don’t try twice whatever you pulled that pissed her off, even if she’s been human-imprinted.</p>
<p>If you’re ever unsure about an animal’s level of okayness with something that’s happening, there are three spot-check questions you can ask, to common-sense your way through it:</p>
<p>1. Is the animal capable of defending itself or making a threatening or fearful display, or otherwise giving protest, and if so, is it using this ability? (e.g. dog snarling or biting, swan hissing, horse kicking or biting) <br/><br/>2. Does the animal experience an incentive-based relationship with the human? (i.e. does the animal have a reason, in the animal’s frame of reference, for being near this human? e.g. dog sharing companionship / food / shelter, hawk receiving good quality abundant food and shelter and medical care from a falconer)</p>
<p>3. Is the animal a domesticated species, with at least a full century of consistent species cohabitation with humans? (Domesticated animals frequently are conditioned from birth or by selective breeding to be unbothered by human actions that upset their feral nearest relatives.)</p>
<p>In this situation, YES the eagle can self-defend, YES the eagle has incentive to cooperate with and trust the human handler, and NO the eagle is not a domesticated species, meaning we can expect a high level of reactivity to distress, compared to domestic animals: if the eagle was distressed, it would be pretty visible and apparent to the viewer. These aren’t a universally applicable metric, but they’re a good start for mammal and bird interactions.</p>
<p>Pair that with the knowledge that eagles reserve those chirps for calm environments, and you can be pretty secure and comfy in the knowledge that the big honkin’ birb is happy and cozy.</p>
<p>Also, to anybody wondering, falconers are almost single-handedly responsible for the recovery from near-extinction of several raptor species, including and especially peregrine falcons. Most hawks only live with the falconer for a year, and most of that year is spent getting the bird in ideal condition for survival and success as a wild breeding adult. Falconers are extensively trained and dedicated wildlife conservationists, pretty much by definition, especially in the continental USA, and they make up an unspeakably important part of the overall conservation of predatory bird species. Predatory birds are an important part of every ecosystem they inhabit. Just like apiarists and their bees, the relationship between falconer and hawk is one of great benefit to the animal and the ecosystem, in exchange for a huge amount of time, effort, expense, and education on the part of the human, for very little personal benefit to that one human. It’s definitely not exploitation of the bird, and most hawks working with falconers are hawks who absolutely would not have reached adulthood without human help: the sick, the injured, and the “runts” of the nest who don’t receive adequate resources from their own parents. These are, by and large, wonderful people who are in love with the natural world and putting a lifetime of knowledge and sheer exhausting <i>work</i> into conserving it and its winged wonders.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>reblogged for excellent info, I’m so glad that big gorgeous birb really is as happy as it looks!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Today’s bit of <a href="http://osberend.tumblr.com/post/152834355142/lately-ive-been-thinking-about-positive-and">positive activism</a>: A reminder that, although the world may contain many bad and awful things, it also contains an enormous winged predator clucking happily as a human gives it a belly rub.<br/></p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://osberend.tumblr.com/post/154339311017/iopele-suspendnodisbelief-naamahdarling" class="tumblr_blog">osberend</a>:</p><blo...

Alive, Dude, and Ignorant: Reply T 33 JTİzzle495-34m But they're not the exact same product, men and women are biologically different. If a woman where to, for example, use a razor marketed towards men, she would skin herself alive because women's skin works different than men's skin. ...Vote <p><a href="http://robin-hood-for-freedom.tumblr.com/post/173597799982/libertarirynn-transtruscum-bizarrolord" class="tumblr_blog">robin-hood-for-freedom</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/173597101529/transtruscum-bizarrolord-ray-winters-sings" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://transtruscum.tumblr.com/post/173566700804/bizarrolord-ray-winters-sings" class="tumblr_blog">transtruscum</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://bizarrolord.tumblr.com/post/173553934044/ray-winters-sings-watercolor-gryphon-mens" class="tumblr_blog">bizarrolord</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://ray-winters-sings.tumblr.com/post/172975536457/watercolor-gryphon-mens-shampoo-turns-woman-to" class="tumblr_blog">ray-winters-sings</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://watercolor-gryphon.tumblr.com/post/172929336883/mens-shampoo-turns-woman-to-stone" class="tumblr_blog">watercolor-gryphon</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Mens shampoo turns woman to stone</p></blockquote> <p>Mens sunscreen catapults women into the sun</p> </blockquote> <p>My mom <i>actually believed </i>this “men and women are basically two different species” stuff. (As do many other radfems.)</p> <p>I’d like to say this is a troll or sarcasm, but I’m not sure.</p> </blockquote> <p>It’s reddit, this isn’t a radfem or a troll. Just an ignorant dude.</p> </blockquote> <p>I mean the point that a lot of the “pink tax“ products are not in fact the “exact same product” is true though. Maybe not with razors but with shampoos and stuff the things that go into the scents and moisturizers have different costs. </p> <p>Also if in fact there is no difference between men’s and women’s razors, then just buy the cheaper men’s razor. Problem solved.</p> </blockquote> <p>Arent women’s razors designed to last longer, because women typically shave larger parts of their body?  </p> </blockquote> <p>That’s probably true. Also men usually use razors to shave their face and I’m fairly certain facial hair is coarser than leg and armpit hair so it stands to reason that they would be designed a little differently.</p><p>Plus people keep acting like they are being *forced* to buy products marketed towards women. Literally no one is doing that. I guarantee you if people stopped buying products marketed towards women companies would stop making them. But people won’t, because whether they want to admit it or not most of these products *are* fundamentally different. This is not a “tax“ by any definition of the word. </p>
Alive, Dude, and Ignorant: Reply T 33
 JTİzzle495-34m
 But they're not the exact same product, men
 and women are biologically different. If a
 woman where to, for example, use a razor
 marketed towards men, she would skin herself
 alive because women's skin works different
 than men's skin.
 ...Vote
<p><a href="http://robin-hood-for-freedom.tumblr.com/post/173597799982/libertarirynn-transtruscum-bizarrolord" class="tumblr_blog">robin-hood-for-freedom</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/173597101529/transtruscum-bizarrolord-ray-winters-sings" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://transtruscum.tumblr.com/post/173566700804/bizarrolord-ray-winters-sings" class="tumblr_blog">transtruscum</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://bizarrolord.tumblr.com/post/173553934044/ray-winters-sings-watercolor-gryphon-mens" class="tumblr_blog">bizarrolord</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ray-winters-sings.tumblr.com/post/172975536457/watercolor-gryphon-mens-shampoo-turns-woman-to" class="tumblr_blog">ray-winters-sings</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://watercolor-gryphon.tumblr.com/post/172929336883/mens-shampoo-turns-woman-to-stone" class="tumblr_blog">watercolor-gryphon</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>Mens shampoo turns woman to stone</p></blockquote>

<p>Mens sunscreen catapults women into the sun</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My mom <i>actually believed </i>this “men and women are basically two different species” stuff. (As do many other radfems.)</p>
<p>I’d like to say this is a troll or sarcasm, but I’m not sure.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It’s reddit, this isn’t a radfem or a troll. Just an ignorant dude.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I mean the point that a lot of the “pink tax“ products are not in fact the “exact same product” is true though. Maybe not with razors but with shampoos and stuff the things that go into the scents and moisturizers have different costs. </p>
<p>Also if in fact there is no difference between men’s and women’s razors, then just buy the cheaper men’s razor. Problem solved.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Arent women’s razors designed to last longer, because women typically shave larger parts of their body?  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s probably true. Also men usually use razors to shave their face and I’m fairly certain facial hair is coarser than leg and armpit hair so it stands to reason that they would be designed a little differently.</p><p>Plus people keep acting like they are being *forced* to buy products marketed towards women. Literally no one is doing that. I guarantee you if people stopped buying products marketed towards women companies would stop making them. But people won’t, because whether they want to admit it or not most of these products *are* fundamentally different. This is not a “tax“ by any definition of the word. </p>

<p><a href="http://robin-hood-for-freedom.tumblr.com/post/173597799982/libertarirynn-transtruscum-bizarrolord" class="tumblr_blog">robin-hoo...