πŸ”₯ | Latest

gary johnson: Did Third-party Candidates Cost Hillary Clinton the Election? Though third-party candidates appear to have drawn a large vote share in key states, Hillary Clinton would have needed to win a huge percentage of this often-misunderstood group of voters in order to flip the election results. MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA WISCONSIN Trump margin of victory: 11837 Stein/Johnson vote: +68.236 191565 27,257 7.4 223,707 What if... Total votes under scenario, in millions of votes TUN Clinton 2.40 EST ES 60% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? し464 2.96 し465 Trump still wins EEM AR 65% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? Trump still wins し46 147 .70% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? Clinton wins E 2.42 2.97 し46 2.98 し47 all of Stein's and half of Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 2.40 Trump still wins 298 し46 し47 2-37 2.96 LA5 148 all of Stein's and 60% of 2.35 2.97 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 242 Clinton wins Note: Donald Trump still wins tossup states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, lowa and Arizona under all of these scenarios. Vote totals as of Friday 5 pm, with 99% of the vote counted. Numbers rounded. Source: Associated Press 2.98 THE WALL STREET JOURNAI evilelitest2: c-bassmeow: zanabism: If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Street Journals analysis on some of the β€˜close’ states HRC lost. In order for her to win she would’ve had to gain pretty much all of Jill stein’s votes and at least 50%-70% of Gary johnson’s votes. This idea that third party candidates cost her the election is just not rooted in reality at all. β˜•οΈ Also if Clinton had you know…gone to the Rust Belt states she might have bloody wonΒ  β˜•οΈ^2
gary johnson: Did Third-party Candidates Cost Hillary Clinton the Election?
 Though third-party candidates appear to have drawn a large vote share in key states, Hillary Clinton
 would have needed to win a huge percentage of this often-misunderstood group of voters in order
 to flip the election results.
 MICHIGAN
 PENNSYLVANIA
 WISCONSIN
 Trump margin of victory: 11837
 Stein/Johnson vote:
 +68.236
 191565
 27,257
 7.4
 223,707
 What if...
 Total votes under scenario, in millions of votes
 TUN
 Clinton 2.40
 EST
 ES
 60% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 し464
 2.96
 し465
 Trump still wins
 EEM
 AR
 65% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 Trump still wins
 し46
 147
 .70% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 Clinton wins
 E
 2.42
 2.97
 し46
 2.98
 し47
 all of Stein's and half of
 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 2.40
 Trump still wins
 298
 し46
 し47
 2-37
 2.96
 LA5
 148
 all of Stein's and 60% of
 2.35
 2.97
 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 242
 Clinton wins
 Note: Donald Trump still wins tossup states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, lowa and Arizona under all of these scenarios. Vote totals as of Friday
 5 pm, with 99% of the vote counted. Numbers rounded.
 Source: Associated Press
 2.98
 THE WALL STREET JOURNAI
evilelitest2:

c-bassmeow:


zanabism:

If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Street Journals analysis on some of the β€˜close’ states HRC lost. In order for her to win she would’ve had to gain pretty much all of Jill stein’s votes and at least 50%-70% of Gary johnson’s votes. This idea that third party candidates cost her the election is just not rooted in reality at all.

β˜•οΈ


Also if Clinton had you know…gone to the Rust Belt states she might have bloody wonΒ 

β˜•οΈ^2

evilelitest2: c-bassmeow: zanabism: If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general...

gary johnson: Did Third-party Candidates Cost Hillary Clinton the Election? Though third-party candidates appear to have drawn a large vote share in key states, Hillary Clinton would have needed to win a huge percentage of this often-misunderstood group of voters in order to flip the election results. MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA WISCONSIN Trump margin of victory: 11837 Stein/Johnson vote: +68.236 191565 27,257 7.4 223,707 What if... Total votes under scenario, in millions of votes TUN Clinton 2.40 EST ES 60% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? し464 2.96 し465 Trump still wins EEM AR 65% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? Trump still wins し46 147 .70% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? Clinton wins E 2.42 2.97 し46 2.98 し47 all of Stein's and half of Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 2.40 Trump still wins 298 し46 し47 2-37 2.96 LA5 148 all of Stein's and 60% of 2.35 2.97 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 242 Clinton wins Note: Donald Trump still wins tossup states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, lowa and Arizona under all of these scenarios. Vote totals as of Friday 5 pm, with 99% of the vote counted. Numbers rounded. Source: Associated Press 2.98 THE WALL STREET JOURNAI zanabism: If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Street Journals analysis on some of the β€˜close’ states HRC lost. In order for her to win she would’ve had to gain pretty much all of Jill stein’s votes and at least 50%-70% of Gary johnson’s votes. This idea that third party candidates cost her the election is just not rooted in reality at all. β˜•οΈ
gary johnson: Did Third-party Candidates Cost Hillary Clinton the Election?
 Though third-party candidates appear to have drawn a large vote share in key states, Hillary Clinton
 would have needed to win a huge percentage of this often-misunderstood group of voters in order
 to flip the election results.
 MICHIGAN
 PENNSYLVANIA
 WISCONSIN
 Trump margin of victory: 11837
 Stein/Johnson vote:
 +68.236
 191565
 27,257
 7.4
 223,707
 What if...
 Total votes under scenario, in millions of votes
 TUN
 Clinton 2.40
 EST
 ES
 60% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 し464
 2.96
 し465
 Trump still wins
 EEM
 AR
 65% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 Trump still wins
 し46
 147
 .70% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 Clinton wins
 E
 2.42
 2.97
 し46
 2.98
 し47
 all of Stein's and half of
 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 2.40
 Trump still wins
 298
 し46
 し47
 2-37
 2.96
 LA5
 148
 all of Stein's and 60% of
 2.35
 2.97
 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 242
 Clinton wins
 Note: Donald Trump still wins tossup states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, lowa and Arizona under all of these scenarios. Vote totals as of Friday
 5 pm, with 99% of the vote counted. Numbers rounded.
 Source: Associated Press
 2.98
 THE WALL STREET JOURNAI
zanabism:

If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Street Journals analysis on some of the β€˜close’ states HRC lost. In order for her to win she would’ve had to gain pretty much all of Jill stein’s votes and at least 50%-70% of Gary johnson’s votes. This idea that third party candidates cost her the election is just not rooted in reality at all.

β˜•οΈ

zanabism: If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington S...