ISIS ISIS baby! Word to your mother.

πŸ”₯ | Latest

America, Friday, and Guns: SO HOW ABOUT EVERY BLACH MAN IN AMERICA GOES OUT TOMORROW AND BUYS AND AR-15 ASSAULT WEAPON. THEY'LL BE BANNED BY FRIDAY WORD!! TRUTH πŸ’― Repost @kendrick38: On the anniversary of the death of the Revolutionary MalcolmX, I figured I’d give a little radical proposal. πŸ€“πŸ˜βœŠπŸ½πŸ–€ It wouldn’t be the first time. BlackHistoryMonth Lesson: β€œThe Mulford Act was a 1967 California bill that repealed a law allowing public carrying of loaded firearms. Named after Republican assemblyman Don Mulford, the bill was crafted in response to members of the BlackPanther Party who were conducting armed patrols of Oakland neighborhoods while they were conducting what would later be termed copwatching.[1] They garnered national attention after the Black Panthers marched bearing arms upon the California State Capitol to protest the bill. AB-1591 was authored by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland, John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[5] it passed both Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) and Senate (split 20:20) and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public. [6] Both Republicans and Democrats in California supported increased gun control. Governor Ronald Reagan was present when the protesters arrived and later commented that he saw "no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons" and that guns were a "ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will." β€œ BlackPanther GunControl Bipartisan GunReformNow
America, Friday, and Guns: SO HOW ABOUT EVERY BLACH
 MAN IN AMERICA GOES OUT
 TOMORROW AND BUYS AND AR-15
 ASSAULT WEAPON. THEY'LL BE
 BANNED BY FRIDAY
WORD!! TRUTH πŸ’― Repost @kendrick38: On the anniversary of the death of the Revolutionary MalcolmX, I figured I’d give a little radical proposal. πŸ€“πŸ˜βœŠπŸ½πŸ–€ It wouldn’t be the first time. BlackHistoryMonth Lesson: β€œThe Mulford Act was a 1967 California bill that repealed a law allowing public carrying of loaded firearms. Named after Republican assemblyman Don Mulford, the bill was crafted in response to members of the BlackPanther Party who were conducting armed patrols of Oakland neighborhoods while they were conducting what would later be termed copwatching.[1] They garnered national attention after the Black Panthers marched bearing arms upon the California State Capitol to protest the bill. AB-1591 was authored by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland, John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[5] it passed both Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) and Senate (split 20:20) and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public. [6] Both Republicans and Democrats in California supported increased gun control. Governor Ronald Reagan was present when the protesters arrived and later commented that he saw "no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons" and that guns were a "ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will." β€œ BlackPanther GunControl Bipartisan GunReformNow

WORD!! TRUTH πŸ’― Repost @kendrick38: On the anniversary of the death of the Revolutionary MalcolmX, I figured I’d give a little radical propos...

Boner, Cars, and Children: shaelit "Cars kill more people than guns! What're you gonna do, regulate cars next?" You idiot. You moron. You utter buffoon Cars ARE regulated The permit test. The permit. The practice year. The regulations on how many hours you have to drive and at what hours and with whom. The driving test. The license. The requirements regarding insurance. License renewals. Road laws. Highway laws. Speed limits. Seatbelt laws. Carseat laws. Laws against drinking and driving and other forms of intoxication. Red lights. Not passing in intersections. Right of way WHO can drive and WHEN and HOW and WHERE are all regulated, because yes, a car in the wrong hands can kill a person. Just like a gun. Oh but wait, there's more! I, as a licensed driver, can't drive anything I want. I can't drivea motorcycle. I can't drive a speedboat. You know what else I can't drive? One of these. To drive a semi-truck, I would need a Commercial Driver's License or CDL There are age limits involved, as well as required hours of training and study. There's a written test and a driving test. There are also medical requirements. And even if I passed all that, you know what I STILL couldn't drive? One of these To drive a semi loaded with hazardous materials, you would have to get a federal H endorsement added to your CDL. And to get that, you have to jump through even MORE hoops, including another written test and a background check. So yeah, guns should be better regulated. Any Joe Blow shouldn't be able to stagger down to a gun show and get himself a sweet piece without some oversight. And ESPECIALLY no one should be getting their hands on a semi-automatic assault rifle like an AR-15, aka the Hazardous Semi Truck of guns. There are professional reasons that a person might need clearance to handle and own such a weapon, but not a civilian. Not an unscreened rando off the street. Try not to be such an utter wanker that you place the mere potential of a power- boner over the lives of actual children like those killed in Parkland, Sandy Hook, and elsewhere prettysicksupply There's also the fact that if I fuck up and njure, or even KILL someone with my vehicle, or another person's vehicle, or a vehicle I'm not even supposed to drive in the first place- I CAN AND WILL BE PUNISHED FOR THAT. I will be made responsible for that damage/death. Insurance exists to help cover the costs of damages- both to cars and people. If my negligence with a vehicle leads to someone's injury or death- my access to vehicles in the future WILL BE COMPROMISED. So yes... we do regulate cars. We also regulate the DAMAGE CAUSED BY THOSE WHO DRIVE THEM chescaleigh also, cars are meant for transportation. sure they can kill people but their sole purpose is not to kill. a gun's ONLY PURPOSE is to maim or kill its target. you can't take a road trip on a gun or load up a gun with groceries. fuck outta here with this bullshit comparison. Cars and guns
Boner, Cars, and Children: shaelit
 "Cars kill more people than guns!
 What're you gonna do, regulate cars
 next?"
 You idiot. You moron. You utter buffoon
 Cars ARE regulated
 The permit test. The permit. The practice
 year. The regulations on how many hours
 you have to drive and at what hours and
 with whom. The driving test. The license.
 The requirements regarding insurance.
 License renewals. Road laws. Highway
 laws. Speed limits. Seatbelt laws. Carseat
 laws. Laws against drinking and driving
 and other forms of intoxication. Red
 lights. Not passing in intersections. Right
 of way
 WHO can drive and WHEN and HOW and
 WHERE are all regulated, because yes, a
 car in the wrong hands can kill a person.
 Just like a gun.

 Oh but wait, there's more!
 I, as a licensed driver, can't drive
 anything I want. I can't drivea
 motorcycle. I can't drive a speedboat.
 You know what else I can't drive? One of
 these.
 To drive a semi-truck, I would need a
 Commercial Driver's License or CDL
 There are age limits involved, as well as
 required hours of training and study.
 There's a written test and a driving test.
 There are also medical requirements.
 And even if I passed all that, you know
 what I STILL couldn't drive? One of
 these

 To drive a semi loaded with hazardous
 materials, you would have to get a
 federal H endorsement added to your
 CDL. And to get that, you have to jump
 through even MORE hoops, including
 another written test and a background
 check.
 So yeah, guns should be better
 regulated. Any Joe Blow shouldn't be
 able to stagger down to a gun show and
 get himself a sweet piece without some
 oversight.

 And ESPECIALLY no one should be
 getting their hands on a semi-automatic
 assault rifle like an AR-15, aka the
 Hazardous Semi Truck of guns. There are
 professional reasons that a person might
 need clearance to handle and own such a
 weapon, but not a civilian. Not an
 unscreened rando off the street.
 Try not to be such an utter wanker that
 you place the mere potential of a power-
 boner over the lives of actual children like
 those killed in Parkland, Sandy Hook, and
 elsewhere
 prettysicksupply
 There's also the fact that if I fuck up and
 njure, or even KILL someone with my
 vehicle, or another person's vehicle, or a
 vehicle I'm not even supposed to drive in
 the first place- I CAN AND WILL BE
 PUNISHED FOR THAT. I will be made
 responsible for that damage/death.
 Insurance exists to help cover the costs

 of damages- both to cars and people. If
 my negligence with a vehicle leads to
 someone's injury or death- my access to
 vehicles in the future WILL BE
 COMPROMISED.
 So yes... we do regulate cars. We also
 regulate the DAMAGE CAUSED BY
 THOSE WHO DRIVE THEM
 chescaleigh
 also, cars are meant for transportation.
 sure they can kill people but their sole
 purpose is not to kill. a gun's ONLY
 PURPOSE is to maim or kill its target. you
 can't take a road trip on a gun or load up
 a gun with groceries. fuck outta here
 with this bullshit comparison.
Cars and guns

Cars and guns