🔥 | Latest

Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 urben911: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!” It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I have… opinions… on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying ‘well he’s only ineligible to be ELECTED’ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying you’re allowed to be in a house because while they said ‘don’t come in this door’ you came in through the WINDOW. You can’t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it “stupid shenanigans” all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. I’m certainly not in support of this idea, I’m just saying you can’t hand wave a legal argument because you’re pretty sure it meant something that’s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said “no former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstances”, but it doesn’t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference. I’m pretty sure from the wording of the amendment it would be perfectly legal. If they ran as biden/Obama that would be legal because Obama isn’t being elected as president. If something happened to Biden where the vp would have to take over then you could have Obama in the white house legally. At least that’s what I get from the wording of the constitution. THANK YOU.It really isn’t that complicated.
Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama
 2020
 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase
 The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden
 to run as President and Barrack Obama as
 his VP.
 Just saying.
 Show this thread
 600
urben911:

libertarirynn:

hst3000:

libertarirynn:
coolmanfromthepast:

libertarirynn:

hst3000:

libertarirynn:

The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice).

All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining.

12th amendment, guys:

No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall 
be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. 
Obama is an unconstitutional selection. 

Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57

All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!”

It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it.

I have… opinions… on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying ‘well he’s only ineligible to be ELECTED’ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying you’re allowed to be in a house because while they said ‘don’t come in this door’ you came in through the WINDOW. You can’t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations.

You can call it “stupid shenanigans” all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. I’m certainly not in support of this idea, I’m just saying you can’t hand wave a legal argument because you’re pretty sure it meant something that’s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said “no former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstances”, but it doesn’t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference.

I’m pretty sure from the wording of the amendment it would be perfectly legal. If they ran as biden/Obama that would be legal because Obama isn’t being elected as president. If something happened to Biden where the vp would have to take over then you could have Obama in the white house legally. At least that’s what I get from the wording of the constitution.

THANK YOU.It really isn’t that complicated.

urben911: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of ...

Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 hst3000: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!” It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I have… opinions… on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying ‘well he’s only ineligible to be ELECTED’ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying you’re allowed to be in a house because while they said ‘don’t come in this door’ you came in through the WINDOW. You can’t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it “stupid shenanigans” all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. I’m certainly not in support of this idea, I’m just saying you can’t hand wave a legal argument because you’re pretty sure it meant something that’s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said “no former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstances”, but it doesn’t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference. Being elected is the default way to become president. I don’t doubt someone would argue it, but it’s a STUPID ARGUMENT. The rest of the argument in that article is ‘well there’s no law saying the parties can’t run a dog for election’ type of crap. “Being elected is the default way to become president” Yes but it’s not the only way. Teddy Roosevelt not initially get elected to the office, he became president when McKinley died. Whether or not it’s a stupid argument is beside the point. We’re talking about theoretical legality.
Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama
 2020
 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase
 The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden
 to run as President and Barrack Obama as
 his VP.
 Just saying.
 Show this thread
 600
hst3000:

libertarirynn:

hst3000:


libertarirynn:

coolmanfromthepast:

libertarirynn:

hst3000:

libertarirynn:

The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice).

All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining.

12th amendment, guys:

No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall 
be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. 
Obama is an unconstitutional selection. 

Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57

All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!”

It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it.

I have… opinions… on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying ‘well he’s only ineligible to be ELECTED’ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying you’re allowed to be in a house because while they said ‘don’t come in this door’ you came in through the WINDOW. You can’t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations.


You can call it “stupid shenanigans” all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. I’m certainly not in support of this idea, I’m just saying you can’t hand wave a legal argument because you’re pretty sure it meant something that’s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said “no former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstances”, but it doesn’t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference.

Being elected is the default way to become president. I don’t doubt someone would argue it, but it’s a STUPID ARGUMENT. The rest of the argument in that article is ‘well there’s no law saying the parties can’t run a dog for election’ type of crap. 

“Being elected is the default way to become president” Yes but it’s not the only way. Teddy Roosevelt not initially get elected to the office, he became president when McKinley died. Whether or not it’s a stupid argument is beside the point. We’re talking about theoretical legality.

hst3000: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of...

Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!” It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I have… opinions… on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying ‘well he’s only ineligible to be ELECTED’ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying you’re allowed to be in a house because while they said don’t come in this door’ you came in through the WINDOW. You can’t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it “stupid shenanigans” all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. I’m certainly not in support of this idea, I’m just saying you can’t hand wave a legal argument because you’re pretty sure it meant something that’s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said “no former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstances”, but it doesn’t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference.
Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama
 2020
 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase
 The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden
 to run as President and Barrack Obama as
 his VP.
 Just saying.
 Show this thread
 600
hst3000:

libertarirynn:
coolmanfromthepast:

libertarirynn:

hst3000:

libertarirynn:

The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice).

All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining.

12th amendment, guys:

No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall 
be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. 
Obama is an unconstitutional selection. 

Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57

All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!”

It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it.

I have… opinions… on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying ‘well he’s only ineligible to be ELECTED’ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying you’re allowed to be in a house because while they said don’t come in this door’ you came in through the WINDOW. You can’t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations.

You can call it “stupid shenanigans” all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. I’m certainly not in support of this idea, I’m just saying you can’t hand wave a legal argument because you’re pretty sure it meant something that’s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said “no former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstances”, but it doesn’t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference.

hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questi...

Being Alone, Cookies, and Facebook: PRIVACY POUCY WEVE UPDATED OUR PRIVACY POUCY THIS 15 PUREY OUT OF THE GOODNES6 OF OUR HEARTS, AND HAS NOTHING To DO WITH ANY HYPOTHETICAL UNIONS ON AY PARTICULAR CONTİNENTS PEASE READ EVERY PART OF THISPoUCY CARERULY AND DONT JUST 5KIP AHEAD LOOKING FOR SEX SCENES. THIS POLICY GOVERNS YOUR INTERACTIONS WTH THIS UEBSITE,HEREIN REFERRED TO AS "THE SERVMICE" THE WEBSITE" "THE INTERNET" OR "FACEBOOK, AND WTH ALL OTHER UEBSITES AND ORGANIZATONS OF ANY KIND. THE ENUMERATION IN THIS POLICY, OF CERTAIN RIGHTS, SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED BY THE USERS. BY USING THIS SERVMCE, YOU OPT IN TO QUARTERING TROOPS IN YOUR HOME. YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION PLEASE DONT SEND US YOUR PERSONAL İNFORMATİON, WE DO NOT WANT YOUR PERS0NAL INFORMATION. WE HAVE A HARD ENOUGH TIME KEEPING TRACK OF OUR OLM/ PERSONAL INFORMATION, LET ALONE YOURS FYOU TELL US YOUR NAME, OR ANY IDENTIFYING INFORMATİON,WE WILL FORGET IT MMEDIATELY THE NEXT TiME WE SEE YOU WELL STRUGGLE TO REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE, AND TRY DESPERATELY TO GET THROUGH THE CONVERSATİON SO WE CAN GO ONLINE AND HOPEFULLY FIGURE IT OUT TRACKING PIXELS, COOKIES, AND BEACONS THIS WEB5ITE PLACES PIXELS ON YOUR SCREEN IN ORDER TO FORM TEX AND IMAGES, 50ME OF WHICH MAY REMAIN IN YOUR MMEMORY AFTER YOU aosE THE PAGE·WE USE COOKIES TO ENHANCE YOUR PERFORMANCE. OUR WEBSITE MPY USE LOCAL STORAGE ON YOUR DEVICE IF WE RUN LOW ON SPACE ON OUR END WE MAY USE BEACONS To CALL ROHAN FOR AID. 3RD PARTY EXTENSIONS THIS SERVICE MAY UTUZE 3RD PARTY EXTENSIONS IN ORDER TO PLAY THE SONG OwUFE 1T FROM THEIR DEBUT ALBUM ALME PERMISSION FOR USERS WHO ARE CITIZENS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, WE WILL NOW BE REQUESTING PERMISSION BEFORE INITİATİNG ORGAN HARVESTING, S AND LIMITATIONS THIS POLICY SUPERSEDES ANY APPUCACLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES INTERNATİONAL TREATİES, AvDLEGAL AGREEMENTS THAT WOULD OTHERUISE APPLY. IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS POLICY IS FOUND BY A COURT TO BE UNENFORCEABLE, IT NEVERTHELESS REMAINS IN FORCE HIS ORGANIZATION IS NOT LIABLE AND THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED THESE STATEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED DY THE FDA. THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED TO TREAT CURE, AND PREVENT ANY DISEASE. IF YOU KNOW ANYONE IN EUROPE, PLEASE TELL THEM WERE COOL. <p><a href="http://memehumor.net/post/174249564393/gdpr" class="tumblr_blog">memehumor</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>GDPR</p></blockquote>
Being Alone, Cookies, and Facebook: PRIVACY POUCY
 WEVE UPDATED OUR PRIVACY POUCY THIS 15 PUREY OUT OF THE GOODNES6
 OF OUR HEARTS, AND HAS NOTHING To DO WITH ANY HYPOTHETICAL UNIONS
 ON AY PARTICULAR CONTİNENTS PEASE READ EVERY PART OF THISPoUCY
 CARERULY AND DONT JUST 5KIP AHEAD LOOKING FOR SEX SCENES.
 THIS POLICY GOVERNS YOUR INTERACTIONS WTH THIS UEBSITE,HEREIN
 REFERRED TO AS "THE SERVMICE" THE WEBSITE" "THE INTERNET" OR
 "FACEBOOK, AND WTH ALL OTHER UEBSITES AND ORGANIZATONS OF ANY
 KIND. THE ENUMERATION IN THIS POLICY, OF CERTAIN RIGHTS, SHALL NOT
 BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED BY THE USERS.
 BY USING THIS SERVMCE, YOU OPT IN TO QUARTERING TROOPS IN YOUR HOME.
 YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION
 PLEASE DONT SEND US YOUR PERSONAL İNFORMATİON, WE DO NOT WANT
 YOUR PERS0NAL INFORMATION. WE HAVE A HARD ENOUGH TIME KEEPING
 TRACK OF OUR OLM/ PERSONAL INFORMATION, LET ALONE YOURS
 FYOU TELL US YOUR NAME, OR ANY IDENTIFYING INFORMATİON,WE WILL
 FORGET IT MMEDIATELY THE NEXT TiME WE SEE YOU WELL STRUGGLE TO
 REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE, AND TRY DESPERATELY TO GET THROUGH THE
 CONVERSATİON SO WE CAN GO ONLINE AND HOPEFULLY FIGURE IT OUT
 TRACKING PIXELS, COOKIES, AND BEACONS
 THIS WEB5ITE PLACES PIXELS ON YOUR SCREEN IN ORDER TO FORM TEX
 AND IMAGES, 50ME OF WHICH MAY REMAIN IN YOUR MMEMORY AFTER YOU
 aosE THE PAGE·WE USE COOKIES TO ENHANCE YOUR PERFORMANCE. OUR
 WEBSITE MPY USE LOCAL STORAGE ON YOUR DEVICE IF WE RUN LOW ON
 SPACE ON OUR END WE MAY USE BEACONS To CALL ROHAN FOR AID.
 3RD PARTY EXTENSIONS
 THIS SERVICE MAY UTUZE 3RD PARTY EXTENSIONS IN ORDER TO PLAY
 THE SONG OwUFE 1T FROM THEIR DEBUT ALBUM ALME
 PERMISSION
 FOR USERS WHO ARE CITIZENS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, WE WILL NOW
 BE REQUESTING PERMISSION BEFORE INITİATİNG ORGAN HARVESTING,
 S AND LIMITATIONS
 THIS POLICY SUPERSEDES ANY APPUCACLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL
 LAWS REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES INTERNATİONAL TREATİES, AvDLEGAL
 AGREEMENTS THAT WOULD OTHERUISE APPLY. IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS
 POLICY IS FOUND BY A COURT TO BE UNENFORCEABLE, IT NEVERTHELESS
 REMAINS IN FORCE
 HIS ORGANIZATION IS NOT LIABLE AND THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE
 CONSTRUED THESE STATEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED DY THE FDA.
 THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED TO TREAT CURE, AND PREVENT ANY DISEASE.
 IF YOU KNOW ANYONE IN EUROPE, PLEASE TELL THEM WERE COOL.
<p><a href="http://memehumor.net/post/174249564393/gdpr" class="tumblr_blog">memehumor</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>GDPR</p></blockquote>

memehumor: GDPR