🔥 | Latest

midterm: I have a midterm next week on flask and Python and Linux and Git and software requirements; wish me luck
 midterm: I have a midterm next week on flask and Python and Linux and Git and software requirements; wish me luck

I have a midterm next week on flask and Python and Linux and Git and software requirements; wish me luck

midterm: Because I should be studying for a midterm
 midterm: Because I should be studying for a midterm

Because I should be studying for a midterm

midterm: hogwartsaheadcanon: college-survivalguide: xiphoidprocess: witch-of-form: draythebaemalfoy: marvilcomicsrock: sonianeverlime: justdoitdaily-fitblr: grilledcheese-samwich: finals im actually speechless I actually did this for math finals For my English essay we were allowed a sheet of notes so I literally spent a week developing THE perfect essay and then summarising each paragraph into one line of shorthand in tiny writing 100%, A* in US Government last year our teacher said we could have one notecard to use as a cheat sheet and gave us a whole packet (meaning like 10 pages) of things that would be on our test. he said, and i quote, “there is no way to fit everything youre going to need on there so you better study” i fit every last piece of info on that card and didnt study at alli got an a moral of the story: dont tell me what i can and cannot do before my midterm in Modern Physics, my teacher told us a story about how one kid kept switching glasses during an exam. he walked over and the kid had red glasses and blue glasses and kept switching between them because he wrote his notecard in red and blue ink. he made a 3d note card. y’all do realize, that with the intense effort it takes to plan and create these sheets, that you’re studying, right? you’re totally studying. love, a TA. The best way to study even if you can’t bring a cheat sheet is to make a cheat sheet and write everything you would write on one if you could have one. It’s an awesome method! ‘but what you’re doing here is studying. its still studying, that exact thing you didnt want to do before…?’ ‘yeah but see this is powered by hubris and spite, so like… it’s better’
 midterm: hogwartsaheadcanon:
college-survivalguide:

xiphoidprocess:

witch-of-form:

draythebaemalfoy:

marvilcomicsrock:

sonianeverlime:

justdoitdaily-fitblr:

grilledcheese-samwich:

finals

im actually speechless

I actually did this for math finals

For my English essay we were allowed a sheet of notes so I literally spent a week developing THE perfect essay and then summarising each paragraph into one line of shorthand in tiny writing 100%, A*

in US Government last year our teacher said we could have one notecard to use as a cheat sheet and gave us a whole packet (meaning like 10 pages) of things that would be on our test. he said, and i quote, “there is no way to fit everything youre going to need on there so you better study” i fit every last piece of info on that card and didnt study at alli got an a
moral of the story: dont tell me what i can and cannot do

before my midterm in Modern Physics, my teacher told us a story about how one kid kept switching glasses during an exam. he walked over and the kid had red glasses and blue glasses and kept switching between them because he wrote his notecard in red and blue ink. he made a 3d note card.

y’all do realize, that with the intense effort it takes to plan and create these sheets, that you’re studying, right? you’re totally studying. love, a TA.


The best way to study even if you can’t bring a cheat sheet is to make a cheat sheet and write everything you would write on one if you could have one. It’s an awesome method!


‘but what you’re doing here is studying. its still studying, that exact thing you didnt want to do before…?’
‘yeah but see this is powered by hubris and spite, so like… it’s better’

hogwartsaheadcanon: college-survivalguide: xiphoidprocess: witch-of-form: draythebaemalfoy: marvilcomicsrock: sonianeverlime: justd...

midterm: ENERGY Sucr of dalk-hn sin. ines in a recctangin ak EPCOT seera PuPrsir/EES +p Arre CK. TH- ndef oran a r tmorr aF ema.n ni cace af er N Cra n, Ppoy, evipmenr rar annear@vicnvidco of hrms op e h Eacuchtdn NERD.Nd5 y ehepl pCF GRET-Hcst depr -e -6aFA+DCPr t dg A adONNC send c Bon wcncCA-CL nd i61CF 1o Crtd int t-Y htw orr ng way.sang fasr CEFA CCA NCE ANw FA HG eciw prtm Catbce tsherche kkrsa Jrk -nr Nu rase tr picrariuy.c CridaF ri evar of evng r tces veves- nae Fre chi o y Kenivuhdnt fentfsnsret p dv iited CY apononk bhsher itru inml bokrty rip e , inntd ve Eof ihd kmy fo -% pernel anid c DCAdv uninacr u , ch, d netO hy og n p A kerprarion- Pv Imt hak, cepararon of d wh yr r lodke sCnent uimty hft rnsfer r rthq menidyCmcrt, weuble PAhn Pf ondrte a PreJy:snehan en ema wi, vie rsna roro Ivaresem mwdern when u can have a 1 page cheat sheet A y niP rchre-wr un WE peiahese n vchhtd a -ex u . 4p Dol fergnh ne plnad hert sns. annark rpenhar is seller rate 2neF rart, 1engu penal, fa ntng auhvines bé ane3 evenge PV rhnlonon rasta N omparnk Py ef rtwn w Expard ses fru r a e wort nuthy Piir m he ad paymter rocc FUbbc offen (sen sanno to pvphe Pboyof pd PANnbyale roly rer-i one r prvare affsc btor Kie h $rom r onn b dririhed a prrion y Prederh h. tansfernng cl Her-mnns Tor p ef arare sh ercunvcann ple- r y k ) 解CALKC りーAcnel re tArtun e h ng u uisan eLondyre 2 Altcrnerve nueinnents wl di opaun pen OTC-edir M In StolS+LT nva taon-eirctrent- NADO Auchen mE iK-hai A plugiol lotanor archs bnsssehers Constant aruwh d ensrantore 8-133cF A L/C tes sje ns vean orall K6alane shechiacuhty ALtE y Vr n pu STUE ote aiy yicld to in 61srmert igs hip ncnil m veran aner effer of alrloni on firmswen Opl Aer pruny mai (nM) urha reA y icpid-her -sh vat pay-p aunvdy tv e Fadin pncl PrL-th Ham an loaun repud-h shnoto poy, finc oun ano to solve for E ( atsltd n purpp ud-rjuoheynvid@at-iane tiahopehahng Srit) CEletttp-h UFFADCE-NS-N d pro-inuru-inwecast bperot gytinyothmno inN PV ayhaikt por/v Gle of glus selvay rtvrn on 10A +eniy ccnnd, doit aain- o subTmaC Inwive orrenr Rasc r e e aleof plantprop enmr ser to cakulare yors deie EP CAVES of debt ov lo+ ex i9un of iastial atay NEGATIVC redecn Prdcbr 7 inC trawtbn TPAY prop or e Se of Aaure apalshc hogwartsaheadcanon: college-survivalguide: xiphoidprocess: witch-of-form: draythebaemalfoy: marvilcomicsrock: sonianeverlime: justdoitdaily-fitblr: grilledcheese-samwich: finals im actually speechless I actually did this for math finals For my English essay we were allowed a sheet of notes so I literally spent a week developing THE perfect essay and then summarising each paragraph into one line of shorthand in tiny writing 100%, A* in US Government last year our teacher said we could have one notecard to use as a cheat sheet and gave us a whole packet (meaning like 10 pages) of things that would be on our test. he said, and i quote, “there is no way to fit everything youre going to need on there so you better study” i fit every last piece of info on that card and didnt study at alli got an a moral of the story: dont tell me what i can and cannot do before my midterm in Modern Physics, my teacher told us a story about how one kid kept switching glasses during an exam. he walked over and the kid had red glasses and blue glasses and kept switching between them because he wrote his notecard in red and blue ink. he made a 3d note card. y’all do realize, that with the intense effort it takes to plan and create these sheets, that you’re studying, right? you’re totally studying. love, a TA. The best way to study even if you can’t bring a cheat sheet is to make a cheat sheet and write everything you would write on one if you could have one. It’s an awesome method! ‘but what you’re doing here is studying. its still studying, that exact thing you didnt want to do before…?’ ‘yeah but see this is powered by hubris and spite, so like… it’s better’
 midterm: ENERGY
 Sucr of dalk-hn
 sin.
 ines
 in a recctangin ak
 EPCOT seera
 PuPrsir/EES
 +p
 Arre CK. TH- ndef oran a r
 tmorr aF ema.n ni cace
 af er
 N Cra n, Ppoy, evipmenr
 rar
 annear@vicnvidco of hrms op e h
 Eacuchtdn
 NERD.Nd5
 y
 ehepl pCF GRET-Hcst depr -e -6aFA+DCPr
 t dg A adONNC send c Bon wcncCA-CL
 nd i61CF 1o Crtd int t-Y htw orr ng
 way.sang
 fasr
 CEFA CCA NCE ANw FA HG
 eciw
 prtm
 Catbce tsherche kkrsa Jrk -nr Nu rase
 tr picrariuy.c CridaF ri
 evar of
 evng
 r tces veves-
 nae
 Fre chi o y
 Kenivuhdnt fentfsnsret p dv iited CY apononk
 bhsher itru inml bokrty
 rip e , inntd
 ve
 Eof ihd kmy fo -% pernel anid c DCAdv uninacr
 u
 , ch, d netO
 hy og n p
 A
 kerprarion- Pv Imt hak, cepararon of d
 wh yr r lodke sCnent uimty hft rnsfer r rthq
 menidyCmcrt, weuble PAhn
 Pf ondrte a PreJy:snehan
 en
 ema
 wi, vie
 rsna roro
 Ivaresem
 mwdern
 when u can have a 1 page cheat sheet
 A y niP rchre-wr un WE
 peiahese n vchhtd a -ex
 u . 4p Dol fergnh ne plnad hert sns. annark rpenhar is seller
 rate 2neF rart, 1engu penal, fa ntng auhvines bé ane3 evenge
 PV
 rhnlonon rasta N omparnk
 Py ef rtwn w
 Expard ses fru r a e wort nuthy Piir m he ad paymter rocc FUbbc offen (sen sanno to pvphe
 Pboyof pd PANnbyale roly rer-i one r
 prvare
 affsc btor
 Kie h
 $rom
 r onn b dririhed a
 prrion
 y
 Prederh h.
 tansfernng cl
 Her-mnns Tor
 p ef arare sh
 ercunvcann
 ple- r y k ) 解CALKC りーAcnel re
 tArtun e h ng u uisan
 eLondyre 2 Altcrnerve nueinnents wl di
 opaun pen
 OTC-edir M In StolS+LT
 nva taon-eirctrent- NADO
 Auchen mE iK-hai A plugiol lotanor
 archs bnsssehers
 Constant aruwh d ensrantore
 8-133cF A
 L/C tes sje ns vean orall K6alane shechiacuhty ALtE y Vr n pu STUE ote aiy yicld to in
 61srmert igs hip ncnil m
 veran aner
 effer of alrloni on firmswen
 Opl Aer pruny mai (nM) urha reA y icpid-her -sh vat pay-p aunvdy
 tv
 e
 Fadin pncl PrL-th
 Ham an loaun repud-h shnoto poy, finc oun ano to solve for E (
 atsltd n purpp ud-rjuoheynvid@at-iane tiahopehahng
 Srit)
 CEletttp-h UFFADCE-NS-N d pro-inuru-inwecast bperot
 gytinyothmno
 inN PV
 ayhaikt
 por/v
 Gle of glus selvay rtvrn on 10A +eniy ccnnd, doit aain- o subTmaC
 Inwive orrenr Rasc r e
 e
 aleof plantprop enmr
 ser to cakulare yors deie
 EP CAVES of debt ov lo+ ex i9un of iastial atay NEGATIVC
 redecn Prdcbr
 7
 inC
 trawtbn TPAY prop or e Se of Aaure apalshc
hogwartsaheadcanon:
college-survivalguide:

xiphoidprocess:

witch-of-form:

draythebaemalfoy:

marvilcomicsrock:

sonianeverlime:

justdoitdaily-fitblr:

grilledcheese-samwich:

finals

im actually speechless

I actually did this for math finals

For my English essay we were allowed a sheet of notes so I literally spent a week developing THE perfect essay and then summarising each paragraph into one line of shorthand in tiny writing 100%, A*

in US Government last year our teacher said we could have one notecard to use as a cheat sheet and gave us a whole packet (meaning like 10 pages) of things that would be on our test. he said, and i quote, “there is no way to fit everything youre going to need on there so you better study” i fit every last piece of info on that card and didnt study at alli got an a
moral of the story: dont tell me what i can and cannot do

before my midterm in Modern Physics, my teacher told us a story about how one kid kept switching glasses during an exam. he walked over and the kid had red glasses and blue glasses and kept switching between them because he wrote his notecard in red and blue ink. he made a 3d note card.

y’all do realize, that with the intense effort it takes to plan and create these sheets, that you’re studying, right? you’re totally studying. love, a TA.


The best way to study even if you can’t bring a cheat sheet is to make a cheat sheet and write everything you would write on one if you could have one. It’s an awesome method!


‘but what you’re doing here is studying. its still studying, that exact thing you didnt want to do before…?’
‘yeah but see this is powered by hubris and spite, so like… it’s better’

hogwartsaheadcanon: college-survivalguide: xiphoidprocess: witch-of-form: draythebaemalfoy: marvilcomicsrock: sonianeverlime: justd...

midterm: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
 midterm: Jason Fuller, Contributor
 Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off.
 Impeachment Is No Longer Enough;
 Donald Trump Must Face Justice
 Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps;
 for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed.
 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET
 for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted
 Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I
 think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative
 disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now
 faces.
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

hominishostilis:

abstractandedgyname:
siryouarebeingmocked:

mississpithy:

bogleech:

notyourmoderate:

angrybell:

thinksquad:


http://archive.is/5VvI5


Huffpo, everybody. 




Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies?

God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. 

Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves.





“

His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job.


“






I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters
It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research?
And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it.

So this:


Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated?


Is a question of this:


Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this?


Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”.


Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? 


(The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.)


Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets…
Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality.
The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place.
This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing.
The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it.
It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”.
You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird.


Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP 

Delicious

This was quite a ride

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate...