🔥 | Latest

Crazy, Driving, and Huh: Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson "He started putting his penis near her vagina. It was BIG. His penis, that is. Not her vagina. THAT was small. Anyways, so his penis is starting to get near her vagina." -excerpt from the sexy kinky book I'm writing 18:01 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone Patti Harrison @Party Harderson once he put his penis near my vagina, THATS when I knew it was going in there soon Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson Then he asked with a smile on his amazing face 'Are you ready for my huge penis stuck in there? Your vagina? and that's when she said, "Yah" and it was time to get it put in Patti Harrison @Party Harderson Had a really really hard time figuring out the quotation marks on this one Patti Harrison @Party Harderson "She arched her back that was unshaved but was naturally hairless. Yes to this sex! She said about it He laughed his pleasure laugh. His Rod was inside & his balls were on the outside the way it ought to be Yes. She screamed each time the cock was in there pokin" Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson That's when he did a move she really liked a lot. He rolled her over on her hairless stomach. 'It's time for it from behind he said, naked Huh? I don't think she heard him It's time for it from behind' he repeated himself moaning during Nice!' She heard him this time Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson "Mmm you feel that?" she said getting it in her pussy "Yah it's really good! I love this it's amazing!" he yelled "Mmm really glad you like it." She said, pointing down to her pussy Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson THEN? She start riding on his penis on top of him as if he were a car & she was driving the car! "Awhaaawlm!" she moaned, the pleasure crazy like a big storm "My penis feels so good. It's hard & this life is crazy" smacking his lips "Yah" she nodded, her tits were there Patti Harrison @Party Harderson I abandoned the quotation mark format I started with because I myself could not comprehend it Mara "Get Rid of the Nazis" Wilson @MaraWilson Replying to @Party_Harderson Put me in rice 19:34 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone Christopher Sabat Replying to @Party Harderson Please let me know when you need a narrator for your audiobook. 7:32 30 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone NSFW - Patti Harrison Quotes Her Sexy Kinky Book
Crazy, Driving, and Huh: Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 "He started putting his penis near her
 vagina. It was BIG. His penis, that is. Not
 her vagina. THAT was small. Anyways, so
 his penis is starting to get near her vagina."
 -excerpt from the sexy kinky book
 I'm writing
 18:01 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 once he put his penis near my vagina,
 THATS when I knew it was going in
 there soon
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 Then he asked with a smile on his
 amazing face 'Are you ready for my huge
 penis stuck in there? Your vagina?
 and that's when she said, "Yah"
 and it was time to get it put in
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 Had a really really hard time figuring out
 the quotation marks on this one
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 "She arched her back that was unshaved
 but was naturally hairless. Yes to this sex!
 She said about it
 He laughed his pleasure laugh. His Rod
 was inside & his balls were on the outside
 the way it ought to be
 Yes. She screamed each time the cock
 was in there pokin"
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 That's when he did a move she really liked
 a lot. He rolled her over on her hairless
 stomach. 'It's time for it from behind
 he said, naked
 Huh? I don't think she heard him
 It's time for it from behind' he repeated
 himself moaning during
 Nice!' She heard him this time
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 "Mmm you feel that?" she said getting
 it in her pussy
 "Yah it's really good! I love this it's
 amazing!" he yelled
 "Mmm really glad you like it." She said,
 pointing down to her pussy
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 THEN? She start riding on his penis on
 top of him as if he were a car & she was
 driving the car!
 "Awhaaawlm!" she moaned, the pleasure
 crazy like a big storm
 "My penis feels so good. It's hard & this life
 is crazy" smacking his lips
 "Yah" she nodded, her tits were there
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 I abandoned the quotation mark format
 I started with because I myself could
 not comprehend it
 Mara "Get Rid of the Nazis" Wilson
 @MaraWilson
 Replying to @Party_Harderson
 Put me in rice
 19:34 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone
 Christopher Sabat
 Replying to @Party Harderson
 Please let me know when you need a
 narrator for your audiobook.
 7:32 30 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone
NSFW - Patti Harrison Quotes Her Sexy Kinky Book

NSFW - Patti Harrison Quotes Her Sexy Kinky Book

Crazy, Driving, and Huh: Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson "He started putting his penis near her vagina. It was BIG. His penis, that is. Not her vagina. THAT was small. Anyways, so his penis is starting to get near her vagina." -excerpt from the sexy kinky book I'm writing 18:01 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson once he put his penis near my vagina, THAT'S when I knew it was going in there soon Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson "Then he asked with a smile on his amazing face 'Are you ready for my huge penis stuck in there? Your vagina?' and that's when she said, "Yah" and it was time to get it put in Patti Harrison @Party Harderson Had a really really hard time figuring out the quotation marks on this one Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson "She arched her back that was unshaved but was naturally hairless. 'Yes to this sex!' She said about it. He laughed his pleasure laugh. His Rod was inside & his balls were on the outside the way it ought to be 'Yes. She screamed each time the cock was in there pokin" Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson That's when he did a move she really liked a lot. He rolled her over on her hairless stomach. 'It's time for it from behind' he said, naked Huh?' I don't think she heard hinm It's time for it from behind' he repeated himself moaning during Nice!' She heard him this time Patti Harrison @Party Harderson "Mmm you feel that?" she said getting it in her pussy "Yah it's really good! I love this it's amazing!" he yelled "Mmm really glad you like it." She said, pointing down to her pussy Patti Harrison @Party_Harderson THEN? She start riding on his penis on top of him as if he were a car & she was driving the car! "Awhaaawlm!" she moaned, the pleasure crazy like a big stormm "My penis feels so good. It's hard & this life is crazy" smacking his lips "Yah" she nodded, her tits were there Patti Harrison @Party Harderson I abandoned the quotation mark format I started with because I myself could not comprehend it Mara "Get Rid of the Nazis" Wilson @MaraWilson Replying to @Party Harderson Put me in rice 19:34 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone Christopher Sabat Replying to@Party_Harderson Please let me know when you need a narrator for your audiobook. 7:32 30 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone NSFW - Patti Harrison Quotes Her Sexy Kinky Book
Crazy, Driving, and Huh: Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 "He started putting his penis near her
 vagina. It was BIG. His penis, that is. Not
 her vagina. THAT was small. Anyways, so
 his penis is starting to get near her vagina."
 -excerpt from the sexy kinky book
 I'm writing
 18:01 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 once he put his penis near my vagina,
 THAT'S when I knew it was going in
 there soon
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 "Then he asked with a smile on his
 amazing face 'Are you ready for my huge
 penis stuck in there? Your vagina?'
 and that's when she said, "Yah"
 and it was time to get it put in
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 Had a really really hard time figuring out
 the quotation marks on this one
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 "She arched her back that was unshaved
 but was naturally hairless. 'Yes to this sex!'
 She said about it.
 He laughed his pleasure laugh. His Rod
 was inside & his balls were on the outside
 the way it ought to be
 'Yes. She screamed each time the cock
 was in there pokin"
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 That's when he did a move she really liked
 a lot. He rolled her over on her hairless
 stomach. 'It's time for it from behind'
 he said, naked
 Huh?' I don't think she heard hinm
 It's time for it from behind' he repeated
 himself moaning during
 Nice!' She heard him this time
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 "Mmm you feel that?" she said getting
 it in her pussy
 "Yah it's really good! I love this it's
 amazing!" he yelled
 "Mmm really glad you like it." She said,
 pointing down to her pussy
 Patti Harrison
 @Party_Harderson
 THEN? She start riding on his penis on
 top of him as if he were a car & she was
 driving the car!
 "Awhaaawlm!" she moaned, the pleasure
 crazy like a big stormm
 "My penis feels so good. It's hard & this life
 is crazy" smacking his lips
 "Yah" she nodded, her tits were there
 Patti Harrison
 @Party Harderson
 I abandoned the quotation mark format
 I started with because I myself could
 not comprehend it
 Mara "Get Rid of the Nazis" Wilson
 @MaraWilson
 Replying to @Party Harderson
 Put me in rice
 19:34 29 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone
 Christopher Sabat
 Replying to@Party_Harderson
 Please let me know when you need a
 narrator for your audiobook.
 7:32 30 Jan 19 Twitter for iPhone
NSFW - Patti Harrison Quotes Her Sexy Kinky Book

NSFW - Patti Harrison Quotes Her Sexy Kinky Book

Bodies , Logic, and Newman: BUTOTHINKOSEE A PROBLEM ALREADY unaffiliatedpangolin: siryouarebeingmocked: alaija: cisnowflake: weaponizedhorse: nunyabizni: eric-coldfire: simon-newman: jeepsarmitage: doomy: occupy-democrats: mstar1960: occupy-democrats: Imagine wanting to spend billions on something so easily circumvented. I guess lefties think that illegal aliens can walk on water. Wow, you’re right. There’s a huge flaw in my post, I forgot that humans have no way to get across water. Thanks for pointing that out, I’ll get right on deleting this. Gay Mexicans on boats… This isn’t even covering planes Considering how many people from Cuba have died trying to cover the 40 miles from there to the US I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that this would wind up having a higher mortality rate than that. ^^ plus where are all these people getting boats from We also have much better boats that could stop their boats. Well Australia doesn’t have a problem with people walking here, so bodies of water must be somewhat effective at preventing illegal immigration. Those waters are already patrolled. It’s just a perfect solution fallacy (nirvana fallacy) with added snark. The exact high standards of logic I’d expect from occupy-dems. Also, doesn’t O-D support gun control to stop shootings? https://occupy-democrats.tumblr.com/tagged/gun-control Yes, yes they do. Each one of those lines is hundreds of miles long. And the Coast Guard exists. OK but… Ya’ll realize that lots of people do still successfully make it to shore on homemade rafts and shit right? “The Coast Guard exists”, so do border patrol agents. Shockingly they don’t stop everybody.
Bodies , Logic, and Newman: BUTOTHINKOSEE A PROBLEM ALREADY
unaffiliatedpangolin:
siryouarebeingmocked:

alaija:

cisnowflake:

weaponizedhorse:


nunyabizni:


eric-coldfire:

simon-newman:

jeepsarmitage:

doomy:

occupy-democrats:

mstar1960:


occupy-democrats:

Imagine wanting to spend billions on something so easily circumvented.

I guess lefties think that illegal aliens can walk on water.


Wow, you’re right. There’s a huge flaw in my post, I forgot that humans have no way to get across water. Thanks for pointing that out, I’ll get right on deleting this.



Gay Mexicans on boats…

This isn’t even covering planes

Considering how many people from Cuba have died trying to cover the 40 miles from there to the US I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that this would wind up having a higher mortality rate than that.


^^ plus where are all these people getting boats from 


We also have much better boats that could stop their boats.

Well Australia doesn’t have a problem with people walking here, so bodies of water must be somewhat effective at preventing illegal immigration.
Those waters are already patrolled.
It’s just a perfect solution fallacy (nirvana fallacy) with added snark.

The exact high standards of logic I’d expect from occupy-dems.
Also, doesn’t O-D support gun control to stop shootings?
https://occupy-democrats.tumblr.com/tagged/gun-control
Yes, yes they do.

Each one of those lines is hundreds of miles long. And the Coast Guard exists. 


OK but… Ya’ll realize that lots of people do still successfully make it to shore on homemade rafts and shit right? “The Coast Guard exists”, so do border patrol agents. Shockingly they don’t stop everybody.

unaffiliatedpangolin: siryouarebeingmocked: alaija: cisnowflake: weaponizedhorse: nunyabizni: eric-coldfire: simon-newman: jeepsarm...

Anaconda, Arguing, and Books: SENSATIONA $1.50 US SOMETHING WOT FRivOLOUS ITS NOT FAIR TO ACCUSE ME OF VANITY! BECAVSE IAM A MAN JUST THRIVE 3OTw siryouarebeingmocked: darkado: mornington-the-crescent: mightyoctopus: siryouarebeingmocked: cisnowflake: anti-capitalistlesbianwitch: 100 Women: The artist redrawing ‘sexist’ comic book covers An artist in India is challenging sexist drawings of women in comic books by parodying them using male heroes in poses typically associated with women. She-Hulk has superhuman strength and speed and is one of the most formidable hand-to-hand combatants in the Marvel world. Like Hulk, not only does she have physical power, she’s also completely green. Yet, on a 1991 comic book cover, she is shown in a seductive pose, wearing a G-string bikini, with her curves sharply accentuated. Indian artist Shreya Arora was shocked when she saw the image. “For Hulk, the visual representation focuses on his strength. For She-Hulk, all we see is an emphasis on sexuality,” says Arora, who grew up reading comic books. The 21-year-old graphic designer decided she wanted to flip the narrative. Why is depicting women as sexy considered sexist? The irony, of course, is that there already was a Spider-Man cover like that second one. Also, this is literally judging a book by its cover. Heck, you’re even ignoring the self-aware speech bubble. The book actually starts with She-Hulk on a beach, so the cover is actually appropriate to the contents. And can I just- LOOK AT SPIDEY’S CROTCH. LOOK AT IT. LOOK AT IT. Yes, clearly we needed a view of Tony’s skintight bodysuit. This is doing the same thing as the Hawkeye Initiative. It’s not clever or original. There are blogs I’d expect to caption a Spiderman picture with “LOOK AT SPIDEY’S CROTCH. LOOK AT IT. LOOK AT IT.” and then there is this blog. Guess I was wrong. The artist also completely failed to get the joke: August, 1991, Demi Moore appears on the cover of “Vanity Fair” magazine, nude and pregnant. It caused quite an outrage, but the controversy lead to increased sales. In December of the same year, Marvel decided to riff on that idea, showing She-Hulk in the same pose, with a beach ball instead of a pregnant belly. She even says, “It’s not FAIR to accuse me of VANITY“, a not-so-subtle nod to the famous magazine cover. tl;dr: Artist is offended by someone else’s work, not understanding anything about the history or concept behind the artwork. I’m usually here for pointing out that men can be sexualized like women but wow you guys really chose the wrong thing to argue with. Sure, Spidey has a nice crotch and Tony is in a bodysuit, but I do really need to point out that not all of these comics are even from the same era? Using Civil War II is ridiculous considering it came out only two years when others are over two decades older. Also, trying to say that the She-Hulk cover is a simple nod could be acceptable if they didn’t do this for every single issue of The Sensational She-Hulk. Even a quick Google search will show that they tried to sell the the comics with sex appeal and She-Hulk admitting that doesn’t make it any better. Comepltely unrelated to the story Entirely nude Completely unnecessary (as stated by She-Hulk) I don’t think I need to explain why these are much more gratuitous than Spidey or Tony. Sure, Spidey has a nice crotch and Tony is in a bodysuit, but I do really need to point out that not all of these comics are even from the same era?OP didn’t make distinctions about era.Using Civil War II is ridiculous considering it came out only two years when others are over two decades older.The Spider-Woman cover is from 2014. That Spidey web-ball cover is from 2000 or so. She-hulk is from 1991.So, even if I give you the whopping two years between the Spider-Woman cover and Civil War 2, OP’s range still covers the time period of that Spidey cover.But in the interests of fairness, lets take a gander at 90s Iron Man.Look at that cyber-bulge and those cyber-abs.Also, trying to say that the She-Hulk cover is a simple nod could be acceptable if they didn’t do this for every single issue of The Sensational She-Hulk. You mean the light-hearted, self-aware comic where the fanservice is clearly a joke, and the character still has choice and agency? How does that represent all female-led comics? At least if they had used a few Catwoman Jim Balent covers, they might’ve had some ground, seeing as he actually seems to have a thing for leather, latex, and lace. Of course, these days Shulk has more conventional covers, which explains why the artist had to go back 25+ years to find them.Also, are you absolutely sure it’s every issue?Every single one?Wow, Electro is ripped here. I don’t need to explain the Bugs Bunny ref, do I?This isn’t even an actual comic cover, it’s Frank Cho fanart. If there’s so much actual examples, why is she using a non-cover? The parody artist even admits she’s focusing on the visuals. People who get bent out of shape because of comic book covers really have too much time on their hands.
Anaconda, Arguing, and Books: SENSATIONA
 $1.50 US
 SOMETHING
 WOT FRivOLOUS
 ITS NOT FAIR
 TO ACCUSE ME
 OF VANITY!
 BECAVSE
 IAM A MAN
 JUST THRIVE
 3OTw
siryouarebeingmocked:

darkado:

mornington-the-crescent:

mightyoctopus:

siryouarebeingmocked:

cisnowflake:

anti-capitalistlesbianwitch:




100 Women: The artist redrawing ‘sexist’ comic book covers



An artist in India is challenging sexist drawings of women in comic books by parodying them using male heroes in poses typically associated with women.
She-Hulk has superhuman strength and speed and is one of the most formidable hand-to-hand combatants in the Marvel world.
Like Hulk, not only does she have physical power, she’s also completely green.
Yet, on a 1991 comic book cover, she is shown in a seductive pose, wearing a G-string bikini, with her curves sharply accentuated.
Indian artist Shreya Arora was shocked when she saw the image.
“For Hulk, the visual representation focuses on his strength. For She-Hulk, all we see is an emphasis on sexuality,” says Arora, who grew up reading comic books.
The 21-year-old graphic designer decided she wanted to flip the narrative.



Why is depicting women as sexy considered sexist? 

The irony, of course, is that there already was a Spider-Man cover like that second one.
Also, this is literally judging a book by its cover. Heck, you’re even ignoring the 

self-aware speech bubble. The book actually starts with She-Hulk on a beach, so the cover is actually appropriate to the contents. And can I just-

LOOK AT SPIDEY’S CROTCH. LOOK AT IT. LOOK AT IT.
Yes, clearly we needed a view of Tony’s skintight bodysuit.
This is doing the same thing as the Hawkeye Initiative. It’s not clever or original.

There are blogs I’d expect to caption a Spiderman picture with “LOOK AT SPIDEY’S CROTCH. LOOK AT IT. LOOK AT IT.” and then there is this blog. Guess I was wrong.

The artist also completely failed to get the joke: 
August, 1991, Demi Moore appears on the cover of “Vanity Fair” magazine, nude and pregnant. It caused quite an outrage, but the controversy lead to increased sales.
In December of the same year, Marvel decided to riff on that idea, showing She-Hulk in the same pose, with a beach ball instead of a pregnant belly. She even says, “It’s not FAIR to accuse me of VANITY“, a not-so-subtle nod to the famous magazine cover.
tl;dr: Artist is offended by someone else’s work, not understanding anything about the history or concept behind the artwork.


I’m usually here for pointing out that men can be sexualized like women but wow you guys really chose the wrong thing to argue with. Sure, Spidey has a nice crotch and Tony is in a bodysuit, but I do really need to point out that not all of these comics are even from the same era? Using Civil War II is ridiculous considering it came out only two years when others are over two decades older. Also, trying to say that the She-Hulk cover is a simple nod could be acceptable if they didn’t do this for every single  issue of The Sensational She-Hulk. Even a quick Google search will show that they tried to sell the the comics with sex appeal and She-Hulk admitting that doesn’t make it any better.
Comepltely unrelated to the story
Entirely nude
Completely unnecessary (as stated by She-Hulk)
I don’t think I need to explain why these are much more gratuitous than Spidey or Tony.

Sure, Spidey has a nice crotch and Tony is in a bodysuit, but I do really need to point out that not all of these comics are even from the same era?OP didn’t make distinctions about era.Using Civil War II is ridiculous considering it came out only two years when others are over two decades older.The Spider-Woman cover is from 2014. That Spidey web-ball cover is from 2000 or so. She-hulk is from 1991.So, even if I give you the whopping two years between the Spider-Woman cover and Civil War 2, OP’s range still covers the time period of that Spidey cover.But in the interests of fairness, lets take a gander at 90s Iron Man.Look at that cyber-bulge and those cyber-abs.Also, trying to say that the She-Hulk cover is a simple nod could be acceptable if they didn’t do this for every single issue of The Sensational She-Hulk. You mean the light-hearted, self-aware comic where the fanservice is clearly a joke, and the character still has choice and agency? How does that represent all female-led comics? At least if they had used a few Catwoman Jim Balent covers, they might’ve had some ground, seeing as he actually seems to have a thing for leather, latex, and lace. Of course, these days Shulk has more conventional covers, which explains why the artist had to go back 25+ years to find them.Also, are you absolutely sure it’s every issue?Every single one?Wow, Electro is ripped here. I don’t need to explain the Bugs Bunny ref, do I?This isn’t even an actual comic cover, it’s Frank Cho fanart. If there’s so much actual examples, why is she using a non-cover? The parody artist even admits she’s focusing on the visuals. 

People who get bent out of shape because of comic book covers really have too much time on their hands.

siryouarebeingmocked: darkado: mornington-the-crescent: mightyoctopus: siryouarebeingmocked: cisnowflake: anti-capitalistlesbianwitch:...

Children, Crazy, and Definitely: Houston ISD * Follow HISD @HoustonISD All students this year, regardless of socioeconomic status, will receive breakfast, lunch, and dinner for FREE. blogs.houstonisd.org/news/2018/08/0 10:13 AM-27 Aug 2018 4,072 Retweets 17,872 Likes @-D @ a Maddie Schafer Follow @SchaferMaddie there are people who are mad in the comments saying that it's not free bc tax payers pick it up."·could you irric)(ine being mad that kids get to eat Houston ISD@HoustonISD All students this year, regardless of socioeconomic status, will receive breakfast, lunch, and dinner for FREE. blogs.houstonisd.org /news/2018/08/0 5:57 PM - 28 Aug 2018 from Missouri, USA 90,655 Retweets 233,296 Likes 園匎目⑤. .. for-liberty: libertarirynn: thatpettyblackgirl: Same people who are upset with this kind of thing are usually pro lifers…the irony runs so deep I’m so sick of seeing this shit about how people who aren’t crazy about tax funded programs “aReN’t PrO lIfE” because they hate children and want them starving to death. Churches have been running summer lunch programs for kids and families that can’t afford meals for years. There are tons of private charities and donations. And the fact is they’re right, these meals are not really free. Now of course I’m not mad the kids get to eat, but please don’t conflate pointing out the difference between free market charity and tax funded charity with not wanting to feed people. I might be revoking my libertarian card by saying this, but this is quite possibly one of the most worthwhile uses of tax money I’ve seen in a long time. Again, there’s no denying that this is a more worthy expenditure than many others and if this were all taxes were going to I’d be perfectly fine with it as a transition until a more private option is put in place. If I were to start eliminating taxes tomorrow the money going to food programs would definitely not be high on the list. But that’s just it, the money we spent on those programs is peanuts in the grand scheme of how much we are taxed.My point is that when people express concern over taxation, they are almost immediately accused of not caring for humanitarian efforts, as though the government is the only humanitarian organization out there when in fact the government is the most inefficient and terrible humanitarian organizations out there. The same money that goes to feed these kids goes to kill hundreds more in the Middle East. It’s absolutely ridiculous to act like the vast majority of taxes are just their “to benefit society“ instead of starting wars and lining the pockets of bureaucrats who regulate our freedoms into oblivion.
Children, Crazy, and Definitely: Houston ISD *
 Follow
 HISD @HoustonISD
 All students this year, regardless of
 socioeconomic status, will receive breakfast,
 lunch, and dinner for FREE.
 blogs.houstonisd.org/news/2018/08/0
 10:13 AM-27 Aug 2018
 4,072 Retweets 17,872 Likes
 @-D
 @ a

 Maddie Schafer
 Follow
 @SchaferMaddie
 there are people who are mad in the
 comments saying that it's not free bc tax
 payers pick it up."·could you irric)(ine being
 mad that kids get to eat
 Houston ISD@HoustonISD
 All students this year, regardless of socioeconomic status, will receive
 breakfast, lunch, and dinner for FREE. blogs.houstonisd.org
 /news/2018/08/0
 5:57 PM - 28 Aug 2018 from Missouri, USA
 90,655 Retweets 233,296 Likes
 園匎目⑤.
 ..
for-liberty:
libertarirynn:


thatpettyblackgirl:
Same people who are upset with this kind of thing are usually pro lifers…the irony runs so deep
I’m so sick of seeing this shit about how people who aren’t crazy about tax funded programs “aReN’t PrO lIfE” because they hate children and want them starving to death. Churches have been running summer lunch programs for kids and families that can’t afford meals for years. There are tons of private charities and donations. And the fact is they’re right, these meals are not really free. Now of course I’m not mad the kids get to eat, but please don’t conflate pointing out the difference between free market charity and tax funded charity with not wanting to feed people.


I might be revoking my libertarian card by saying this, but this is quite possibly one of the most worthwhile uses of tax money I’ve seen in a long time.
Again, there’s no denying that this is a more worthy expenditure than many others and if this were all taxes were going to I’d be perfectly fine with it as a transition until a more private option is put in place. If I were to start eliminating taxes tomorrow the money going to food programs would definitely not be high on the list. But that’s just it, the money we spent on those programs is peanuts in the grand scheme of how much we are taxed.My point is that when people express concern over taxation, they are almost immediately accused of not caring for humanitarian efforts, as though the government is the only humanitarian organization out there when in fact the government is the most inefficient and terrible humanitarian organizations out there. The same money that goes to feed these kids goes to kill hundreds more in the Middle East. It’s absolutely ridiculous to act like the vast majority of taxes are just their “to benefit society“ instead of starting wars and lining the pockets of bureaucrats who regulate our freedoms into oblivion.

for-liberty: libertarirynn: thatpettyblackgirl: Same people who are upset with this kind of thing are usually pro lifers…the irony runs so...

Children, Crazy, and Life: Houston ISD * Follow HISD @HoustonISD All students this year, regardless of socioeconomic status, will receive breakfast, lunch, and dinner for FREE. blogs.houstonisd.org/news/2018/08/0 10:13 AM-27 Aug 2018 4,072 Retweets 17,872 Likes @-D @ a Maddie Schafer Follow @SchaferMaddie there are people who are mad in the comments saying that it's not free bc tax payers pick it up."·could you irric)(ine being mad that kids get to eat Houston ISD@HoustonISD All students this year, regardless of socioeconomic status, will receive breakfast, lunch, and dinner for FREE. blogs.houstonisd.org /news/2018/08/0 5:57 PM - 28 Aug 2018 from Missouri, USA 90,655 Retweets 233,296 Likes 園匎目⑤. .. thatpettyblackgirl:Same people who are upset with this kind of thing are usually pro lifers…the irony runs so deepI’m so sick of seeing this shit about how people who aren’t crazy about tax funded programs “aReN’t PrO lIfE” because they hate children and want them starving to death. Churches have been running summer lunch programs for kids and families that can’t afford meals for years. There are tons of private charities and donations. And the fact is they’re right, these meals are not really free. Now of course I’m not mad the kids get to eat, but please don’t conflate pointing out the difference between free market charity and tax funded charity with not wanting to feed people.
Children, Crazy, and Life: Houston ISD *
 Follow
 HISD @HoustonISD
 All students this year, regardless of
 socioeconomic status, will receive breakfast,
 lunch, and dinner for FREE.
 blogs.houstonisd.org/news/2018/08/0
 10:13 AM-27 Aug 2018
 4,072 Retweets 17,872 Likes
 @-D
 @ a

 Maddie Schafer
 Follow
 @SchaferMaddie
 there are people who are mad in the
 comments saying that it's not free bc tax
 payers pick it up."·could you irric)(ine being
 mad that kids get to eat
 Houston ISD@HoustonISD
 All students this year, regardless of socioeconomic status, will receive
 breakfast, lunch, and dinner for FREE. blogs.houstonisd.org
 /news/2018/08/0
 5:57 PM - 28 Aug 2018 from Missouri, USA
 90,655 Retweets 233,296 Likes
 園匎目⑤.
 ..
thatpettyblackgirl:Same people who are upset with this kind of thing are usually pro lifers…the irony runs so deepI’m so sick of seeing this shit about how people who aren’t crazy about tax funded programs “aReN’t PrO lIfE” because they hate children and want them starving to death. Churches have been running summer lunch programs for kids and families that can’t afford meals for years. There are tons of private charities and donations. And the fact is they’re right, these meals are not really free. Now of course I’m not mad the kids get to eat, but please don’t conflate pointing out the difference between free market charity and tax funded charity with not wanting to feed people.

thatpettyblackgirl:Same people who are upset with this kind of thing are usually pro lifers…the irony runs so deepI’m so sick of seeing this...