🔥 | Latest

race wars: Virgin r/politics The Virgin Reddit Politics Virgin r/The_Donald Claims to be Platform turned publisher Lots of boomer memes neutral Best investigators failed to get the Boston Bomber Did literally nothing Is probably still with her wrong but got quarantined Bans people for being too radical Shitty logo Bans racism Has a twin in Had to make an entire Supports the two-party system instead of the Chad Wizard website out of fear r/PoliticalHumor of getting shut down One-Party System CHAD /leftypol/ THE CHAD CHAN POLITICS CHAD /pol/ As stronk as S Stalin Bombed a Syrian rebel training camp Hijacks cartoon frogs and hand signs People actively try to take them off They had to yeet his entire fucking the Internet His mere presence website causes race wars Absolute free speech Forces people to read Siege at gunpoint Punches everyone Birthplace of Virgin vs Chad he disagrees with memes Somehow survives Made his without eating Own country THE THAD DEEP WEB POLITICS Main politics is who sells the best cocaine You have to install a special browser to even aCcess it literally regarded as some kind of terrifying evil entity The thing that most resembles actual politics is conspiracy theories Covered in blood Political leaders are being hunted by the FBI from his last hitman job Hadn't made a VvC in a while, so I decided to make this incredibly crusty VvC: Virgin Reddit Politics vs Chad Chan Politics vs Thad Deep Web Politics
race wars: Virgin r/politics
 The Virgin Reddit Politics
 Virgin r/The_Donald
 Claims to be
 Platform turned publisher
 Lots of boomer memes
 neutral
 Best investigators failed to get
 the Boston Bomber
 Did literally nothing
 Is probably still
 with her
 wrong
 but got quarantined
 Bans people for being too
 radical
 Shitty logo
 Bans racism
 Has a twin in
 Had to make an entire
 Supports the two-party system
 instead of the Chad
 Wizard
 website out of fear
 r/PoliticalHumor
 of getting shut down
 One-Party System
 CHAD /leftypol/
 THE CHAD CHAN POLITICS
 CHAD /pol/
 As stronk as S
 Stalin
 Bombed a Syrian rebel
 training camp
 Hijacks cartoon frogs
 and hand signs
 People actively try
 to take them off
 They had to yeet
 his entire fucking
 the Internet
 His mere presence
 website
 causes race wars
 Absolute free speech
 Forces people
 to read Siege
 at gunpoint
 Punches everyone
 Birthplace of Virgin vs Chad
 he disagrees with
 memes
 Somehow survives
 Made his
 without eating
 Own country
 THE THAD DEEP WEB POLITICS
 Main politics is who sells
 the best cocaine
 You have to install a special browser
 to even aCcess it
 literally regarded
 as some kind of
 terrifying evil entity
 The thing that most resembles
 actual politics is conspiracy theories
 Covered in blood
 Political leaders are being hunted
 by the FBI
 from his last hitman job
Hadn't made a VvC in a while, so I decided to make this incredibly crusty VvC: Virgin Reddit Politics vs Chad Chan Politics vs Thad Deep Web Politics

Hadn't made a VvC in a while, so I decided to make this incredibly crusty VvC: Virgin Reddit Politics vs Chad Chan Politics vs Thad Deep...

race wars: enreddit /unitedkingdom comments other discussions (6) Y show images metrics queue tools Durham neo-Nazi teenager convicted of planning terror attack (bbc.co.uk) submitted 22 hours ago by ParkingWillow +2] 75 comments share save hide give award report crosspost hide all child comments sorted by: best you are viewing a single comment's thread view the rest of the comments H JohrisBohnson 11 points 22 hours ago A teenage neo-Nazi who wrote about an "inevitable race war" in his diary Absolutely nothing to do with our racist PM or the army of racisits supporting him and normalising these sort of views. For example, A majority of Tories believe Islam is a threat to our way of life. This is the sort of mentality that leads to people obsessing about race wars. permalink source embed save save-RES edit disable inbox replies delete reply hide child comments FarRightAnd LeftSuck -1] 1 point 18 hours ago A religion that stones women and throws gays off buildings isn't a threat? permalink source embed save save-RES parent report give award reply hide child comments Hey, I was wondering what the rules were on hate speech here? r/unitedkingdom collapse all expand all Hto Irlunitedkingdom sent 15 hours ago This comment is concerning: https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/dz3r92/durham_neonazi_teenager_convicted_of_planning/f85p8gh/ Is it allowable? permalink source reply Hfrom MonsterMufffin OM] via Ir/unitedkingdom sent an hour ago OP is an asshole for sure, but I don't personally see a removable/bannable offence in that comment. If you feel it's wrong downvote and move on or downvote and tell OP he/she is wrong. We will take action on hate speech, but I don't believe this falls under that Cheers permalink source delete report block user mark unread reply According to the r/unitedkingdom mods calling all Muslims murderous misogynists/homophobes isn't grounds to remove a comment
race wars: enreddit /unitedkingdom
 comments other discussions (6) Y
 show images metrics queue tools
 Durham neo-Nazi teenager convicted of planning terror attack (bbc.co.uk)
 submitted 22 hours ago by ParkingWillow +2]
 75 comments share save hide give award report crosspost hide all child comments
 sorted by: best
 you are viewing a single comment's thread
 view the rest of the comments
 H JohrisBohnson
 11 points 22 hours ago
 A teenage neo-Nazi who wrote about an "inevitable race war" in his diary
 Absolutely nothing to do with our racist PM or the army of racisits supporting him and normalising these sort of views.
 For example, A majority of Tories believe Islam is a threat to our way of life. This is the sort of mentality that leads to people obsessing
 about race wars.
 permalink source embed save save-RES edit disable inbox replies delete reply hide child comments
 FarRightAnd LeftSuck
 -1] 1 point 18 hours ago
 A religion that stones women and throws gays off buildings isn't a threat?
 permalink source embed save save-RES parent report give award reply hide child comments
 Hey, I was wondering what the rules were on hate speech here?
 r/unitedkingdom
 collapse all
 expand all
 Hto Irlunitedkingdom sent 15 hours ago
 This comment is concerning:
 https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/dz3r92/durham_neonazi_teenager_convicted_of_planning/f85p8gh/
 Is it allowable?
 permalink source reply
 Hfrom MonsterMufffin
 OM] via Ir/unitedkingdom sent an hour ago
 OP is an asshole for sure, but I don't personally see a removable/bannable offence in that comment. If you feel it's wrong downvote and
 move on or downvote and tell OP he/she is wrong.
 We will take action on hate speech, but I don't believe this falls under that
 Cheers
 permalink source
 delete report block user mark unread reply
According to the r/unitedkingdom mods calling all Muslims murderous misogynists/homophobes isn't grounds to remove a comment

According to the r/unitedkingdom mods calling all Muslims murderous misogynists/homophobes isn't grounds to remove a comment

race wars: a CbboFOtcZs ID: eff7c9 No.192548 Jun 30 2018 13.36:13 (EST) You have a choice. The choice has always been ycurs. POWER TO THE PEOPLE. THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED THEY WANT RACE WARS. THEY WANT CLASS WARS. THEY WANT RELIGIOUS WARS THEY WANT POLITICAL WARS THEY USE THE MEDIA THEY ARE LOUD GROUP THINK. PUBLIC SHAME AGAINST THOSE WHO CHALLENGE. SLAVERY NEVER IN OUR HISTORY HAVE THEY BEEN THIS EXPOSED NEVER IN OUR HISTORY HAVE THEY COME OUT FROM THE SHADOWS TO FIGHT THE TRUTH IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. DEFEND MS-13? DEFEND THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BORDERS? PROMOTE THE FEAR NUCLEAR WAR IF POTUS REMAINS IN NUCLEAR ALERTS MALFUNCTION? COMPARE TO HITLERNAZIS? PROMOTE VIOLENCE? PROMOTE HATE? PROMOTE WAR? PROMOTE ECONOMIC DECLINE? PROMOTE NK TO END TALKS W/ POTUS? PROMOTE IMPEACHMENT FOR NO REASON? PROMOTE RACISM? PROMOTE FACISM? PROMOTE RIOTS? FORM ANTI FA-VIOLENT GROUP DESIGNED TO INSTILL FEAR IN FREE SPEECH HATRED FOR AMERICA SHEEP FOLLOW BLINDLY THEY ARE SCARED THEY ARE LOSING CONTROL. WE KNEW THIS DAY WOULD COME WE PLANNED WE FIGHT DARK TO LIGHT GOD BLESS AMERICA GOD BLESS PATRIOTS AROUND THE WORLD THINK FOR YOURSEL TRUST YOURSELF COURAGE TOGETHER We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,-That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shal seem most ikely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Cbject evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Be on your guard: stand firm in the faith: be courageous; be You have a choice. The choice has always been yours.
race wars: a CbboFOtcZs ID: eff7c9 No.192548
 Jun 30 2018 13.36:13 (EST)
 You have a choice.
 The choice has always been ycurs.
 POWER TO THE PEOPLE.
 THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED
 THEY WANT RACE WARS.
 THEY WANT CLASS WARS.
 THEY WANT RELIGIOUS WARS
 THEY WANT POLITICAL WARS
 THEY USE THE MEDIA
 THEY ARE LOUD
 GROUP THINK.
 PUBLIC SHAME AGAINST THOSE WHO CHALLENGE.
 SLAVERY
 NEVER IN OUR HISTORY HAVE THEY BEEN THIS EXPOSED
 NEVER IN OUR HISTORY HAVE THEY COME OUT FROM THE
 SHADOWS TO FIGHT
 THE TRUTH IS CLEARLY VISIBLE.
 DEFEND MS-13?
 DEFEND THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BORDERS?
 PROMOTE THE FEAR NUCLEAR WAR IF POTUS REMAINS IN
 NUCLEAR ALERTS MALFUNCTION?
 COMPARE TO HITLERNAZIS?
 PROMOTE VIOLENCE?
 PROMOTE HATE?
 PROMOTE WAR?
 PROMOTE ECONOMIC DECLINE?
 PROMOTE NK TO END TALKS W/ POTUS?
 PROMOTE IMPEACHMENT FOR NO REASON?
 PROMOTE RACISM?
 PROMOTE FACISM?
 PROMOTE RIOTS?
 FORM ANTI FA-VIOLENT GROUP DESIGNED TO INSTILL FEAR
 IN FREE SPEECH
 HATRED FOR AMERICA
 SHEEP FOLLOW BLINDLY
 THEY ARE SCARED
 THEY ARE LOSING CONTROL.
 WE KNEW THIS DAY WOULD COME
 WE PLANNED
 WE FIGHT
 DARK TO LIGHT
 GOD BLESS AMERICA
 GOD BLESS PATRIOTS AROUND THE WORLD
 THINK FOR YOURSEL
 TRUST YOURSELF
 COURAGE
 TOGETHER
 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
 equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
 unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
 pursuit of Happiness.-That to secure these rights, Governments
 are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the
 consent of the governed,-That whenever any Form of Government
 becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to
 alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its
 foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such
 form, as to them shal seem most ikely to effect their Safety and
 Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long
 and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more
 disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right
 themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
 But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
 invariably the same Cbject evinces a design to reduce them under
 absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such
 Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
 Be on your guard: stand firm in the faith: be courageous; be
You have a choice. The choice has always been yours.

You have a choice. The choice has always been yours.

race wars: KaineDamoHow you are stunted by black and white thinking expand all collapse all -] fromsent 14 hours ago Hello! i love to check out the echo-chamber that is GamerGhazi once in a while, I'm endlessly fascinated by the sorts of characterizations and generalizations without actually addressing what people are really saying. There's actual real people with all their individuality and nuance, and then there's the cartoon villain strawmen that exist only in your brain. Take Dankula, for example. Dank has every reason in the world to support a party that takes a strong stance on free speech in the UK. When you listen to Dank's views, the dude is clearly very liberal. And you'd know that if you ever actually took the time to listen to him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v-h-v8sN5cSOs&t-1m30s "Freedom of speech is not a right wing goal and not a left wing goal. It's a human goal. It's a human right that everyone deserves... Your political opponents aren't cartoon villains!! The world is not that black and white. You're all going to be left in the dust if you continue on blinded by ideology permalink delete report block user mark unread reply [-1 tosent 14 hours ago They're all "very liberal, if they're to be believed. What the hell even brought this on? permalink H from sent 14 hours ago Reading the wacky posts on Ghazi. That stuff is hilarious. You know Dank better than he knows himself!! Lend me your psychic powers, Robert permalink delete report block user mark unread reply -1 tosent 13 hours ago I meant which comment of mine, dipshit. Were you just scrolling around the board picking people at random to white knight a guy who looks like he was curbstomped on a motherboard? Explain to me what specifically caught your attention permalink -1 fromsent 13 hours ag <That sure is weird how every time one of "these people" reveals themselves as not quite as liberal as they said they were, it always because an "extremist!" pushed them there. Literally every single time. That sure is weird how all of these people were actually people who "left the Left!", instead of just actually having been kind of dickheads the entire time Like damn, you'd think just the law of averages, it would happen once or twice. At least. But no! Somehow it's literally always everyone else's fault these guys end up douchebags. Weird! Everyone I don't like is a cartoon villain! permalink delete report block user mark unread reply I-1 tosent 12 hours ago Ok so I watched your Dankula video, in it he bitches about "muh joke though" and complains about ((The Left))) What was I supposed to take away from this? "Oh, why he's not a racist at all, he was kidding!" I know he said he was kidding, in that comment you just quoted I'm making fun of the fact that he and his fans are routinely blame everyone except themselves for "pushing them out of the Left". ent 12 hours ago to Ok so I watched your Dankula video, in it he bitches about "muh joke though" and complains about (((The Left))). What was I supposed to take away from this? "Oh, why he's not a racist at all, he was kidding!"? I know he said he was kidding, in that comment you just quoted I'm making fun of the fact that he and his fans are routinely blame everyone except themselves for "pushing them out of the Left". It's like you have a little Ghazi template you just sent out to people without even worrying about whether or not it fit the context of what they actually said, you just assumed everyone was going to scream 'ALT-RIGHT SHITLORD!" and you could giggle about how you triggered somebody Can you find me the timestamp where he makes it clear he's "clearly very liberal", or was that little bit where he says he's anti-racewar all you had? Is that all it takes to be a Liberal for you guys? Not really too keen on race wars? permalink -from sent 11 hours ago I did send out a 'template', it fit each person I sent it to because I read your crazy posts. I did that because Ghazi's an echo chamber and so there are no counter-points allowed, so I made my point to a few folks individually It's beyond me how anyone can be familiar with Dank, listen to what he has to say (such as that speech), and come away thinking the dude's 'far right'. It's insanity, it is as though a portion of the left have abandoned critical thinking for cult-ideological thinking For example, when Dank says "I reject any notion of superiority or inferiority based on race, I reject the idea of an ethnostate, if you want to live here in peace you are welcome in this country..." Your response is what? That he's lying? That what he's saying isn't good enough? What would you have him do and say? You don't have to take anything I say at face value, nevertheless you do have a massive misconception that if someone complains about ((The Left)) that this infers some sort of guilt? I'm 34, I've been liberal since I first understood politics in my early teens. I believe that over time 'the left' has changed. I often see people who are supposed to be left-leaning arguing against and undermining free speech. A portion of the left are authoritarians, and it's completely valid to be critical of that. From my point of view, one of the problems with leftists of today is they often strawman people they don't like, assume the worst about people they don't like, and misuse and dis-empower all sorts of terms and labels. White supremacist, misogynist, islamophobe, nazi, have all become catch-all terms for anyone right of far left, in quite frankly far too many left-wing circles, and shutting down the ability of people generally to discuss serious issues witlh any nuance. The press in particular has a large part of the blame. The video game moral panic, for example, is largely the press's fault. So in summary - you dislike Straw-Dank, not the real Dank. Unless you can coherently explain valid reasons for disliking the real Dank permalink delete report block user mark unread reply sent 11 hours ago Why didn't you answer my very specific question. permalink sent 10 hours ago Ok just so I have you correct; anything short of actual ethnic cleansing makes you a "liberal", yes or no? Pro immigration, ok, fine, but historically "boot out all the darkies" was more of a moderate stance, not necessarily the cry of the bleeding heart. More to your (repeated, jesus christ...) point, yeah, I think Dankyboi is much more comfortable with paling around with le far right than a ton of liberals generally are. Now you've gone on quite a tirade there about how that's ackshually just coz he likes free speech so much! But you tap danced all all the initial point that pissed you off enough to PM in the first place; it's literally always some and it's never a matter of what they actually did, but of an extremist force forcing them to "leave the left!". Consistently, this has been the case with most of the GamerGate types. How many admitted Conservative GamerGaters do you see? I know of, like, 3. the rest all claim to be "liberal". Oh, they can't tell you much of anything iberal leanings they have, how many liberal politicians they support or have supported in the past, and they all fall in lock-step with more brazenly right wing vloggers and columnists. Most of you championing this as all of you coming together under a multitude of different political background and ideologies and "beating back the extremists!", but it seems to be the lot of you simply don't understand- or have only the vaguest understanding of- "liberalism". George elses fault when the pe ple find themselves in a controversy ubya Bush wanted a "more fair" immigration process, Ronald Reagan outright gave amnesty. Were those gentlemen "liberal" Presidents? Indeed I've yet to see Dankula or any "actually liberal" critique any right wing commentator or argument of substance. Barring, again, "an ethnostate is bad". The problem there is an "ethnostate" isn't a realistic political option for anyone outside of/pol/. His big brave stand against the extremist right is essentially one thing, that there's zero realistic danger of happening in the first place. He's to be given credit for that? Does he have anything to say about racist attacks towards Londons mayor? He seems very friendly with Tommy Robinson, the same man who did this What am I to make of that? Mr Dank also has repeatedly repeatedly referred to himself as "edgy" and a "shitposter", terms you're surely familiar with. A man who enjoys getting a rise out of people. We now have demonstrated as someone who both enjoys his "absolute" free speech, and pals around with undeniably far-right figures. Do you not understand how his antics there and explicit support for others doing similar things. Racism is merely a tool to be "played with" to rile up some extremists, is that right? Am I not allowed to consider Captain Danky sort of an asshole for doing this? In summation; 1. I do not believe Dankybois brief pandering towards "liking immigration" counts as solid liberalism especially be 2. He's admittedl nd himself very comfortable with fa right figu much more so than any other "moderate 3. Combining poi part du nd him 0 nd da round his own D ngs persona, making him ympathies bu f his "edgy shit ort of a dipshit 4. I did I him "right wing po off so bad. Ev ed him a dickhead and a do omethi eba here and spe ing trying to "debate me" ou ng I didn perm from sent 10 hours ago You failed to answer my direct question. Is Dank actually far right? It's getting late here, there's a lot in your post that is misconception, ignorance, and exactly what I talked about earlier which is interpreting things in the most ungenerous way possible. This, Ok just so I have you correct; anything short of actual ethnic cleansing makes you a "liberal", yes or no? This speaks volumes about your ideology. Supporting sensible immigration isn't 'short of actual ethnic cleansing'. Wtf are you talking about? The last thing I think if someone says the SUPPORT immigration, is 'that individual is JUST SHORT OF ENDORSING ETHNIC CLEANSING!!' Good arief. Also, guilt by association is a fallacy. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/Ip/Bo/LogicalFallacies/10/Ad-Hominem- Guilt-by-Association Also, you're just ignorant about the actual positions of people who support GamerGate. There isn't anything wrong with ignorance in and of itself, it's not entirely your fault. As I said, the press has a lot of share of the blame. Still some willful ignorance is definitely at play here Award winning journalist and his research: http://www.gameobjective.com/2016/11/21/no-gamergate-is-not-right- wing I took part in that study, by the way, and part of the study was specifically asking which parties/candidates you vote or I'll address this further tomorrow. permalink delete report block user mark unread reply to sent 9 hours ago Is Dank actually far right? I think so, yeah permalink from sent 4 hours ago Best case for why? Specific quotes and actions that support this? Which of his positions are far right? permalink delete report block user mark unread reply to I just told you So this is seriously what you guys think is good "debating"? Like this is your best tactic to stop the press attacks against you? Surprising motherfuckers in DMs and hoping you bombard them with enough bullshit that they just admit "I... I uh.. I don't know... I guess he's NOT?!".? Is this the plan of attack? sent 2 minutes ago permalink 34 year old GamerGate guy demands prolonged debate via PM after stumbling across me bashing a favorite vlogger on Reddit
race wars: KaineDamoHow you are stunted by black and white thinking
 expand all collapse all
 -] fromsent 14 hours ago
 Hello! i love to check out the echo-chamber that is GamerGhazi once in a while, I'm endlessly fascinated by the sorts
 of characterizations and generalizations without actually addressing what people are really saying. There's actual real
 people with all their individuality and nuance, and then there's the cartoon villain strawmen that exist only in your
 brain. Take Dankula, for example. Dank has every reason in the world to support a party that takes a strong stance on
 free speech in the UK. When you listen to Dank's views, the dude is clearly very liberal. And you'd know that if you
 ever actually took the time to listen to him:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v-h-v8sN5cSOs&t-1m30s
 "Freedom of speech is not a right wing goal and not a left wing goal. It's a human goal. It's a human right that
 everyone deserves...
 Your political opponents aren't cartoon villains!! The world is not that black and white. You're all going to be left in the
 dust if you continue on blinded by ideology
 permalink delete report block user mark unread reply
 [-1 tosent 14 hours ago
 They're all "very liberal, if they're to be believed. What the hell even brought this on?
 permalink
 H from
 sent 14 hours ago
 Reading the wacky posts on Ghazi. That stuff is hilarious. You know Dank better than he knows himself!! Lend me
 your psychic powers, Robert
 permalink delete report block user mark unread reply
 -1 tosent 13 hours ago
 I meant which comment of mine, dipshit. Were you just scrolling around the board picking people at random to white
 knight a guy who looks like he was curbstomped on a motherboard? Explain to me what specifically caught your
 attention
 permalink
 -1 fromsent 13 hours ag
 <That sure is weird how every time one of "these people" reveals themselves as not quite as liberal as they said they
 were, it always because an "extremist!" pushed them there.
 Literally every single time. That sure is weird how all of these people were actually people who "left the Left!",
 instead of just actually having been kind of dickheads the entire time
 Like damn, you'd think just the law of averages, it would happen once or twice. At least. But no! Somehow it's
 literally always everyone else's fault these guys end up douchebags. Weird!
 Everyone I don't like is a cartoon villain!
 permalink delete report block user mark unread reply
 I-1 tosent 12 hours ago
 Ok so I watched your Dankula video, in it he bitches about "muh joke though" and complains about ((The Left)))
 What was I supposed to take away from this? "Oh, why he's not a racist at all, he was kidding!" I know he said he
 was kidding, in that comment you just quoted I'm making fun of the fact that he and his fans are routinely blame
 everyone except themselves for "pushing them out of the Left".

 ent 12 hours ago
 to
 Ok so I watched your Dankula video, in it he bitches about "muh joke though" and complains about (((The Left))).
 What was I supposed to take away from this? "Oh, why he's not a racist at all, he was kidding!"? I know he said he
 was kidding, in that comment you just quoted I'm making fun of the fact that he and his fans are routinely blame
 everyone except themselves for "pushing them out of the Left".
 It's like you have a little Ghazi template you just sent out to people without even worrying about whether or not it fit
 the context of what they actually said, you just assumed everyone was going to scream 'ALT-RIGHT SHITLORD!" and
 you could giggle about how you triggered somebody
 Can you find me the timestamp where he makes it clear he's "clearly very liberal", or was that little bit where he says
 he's anti-racewar all you had? Is that all it takes to be a Liberal for you guys? Not really too keen on race wars?
 permalink
 -from
 sent 11 hours ago
 I did send out a 'template', it fit each person I sent it to because I read your crazy posts. I did that because Ghazi's an
 echo chamber and so there are no counter-points allowed, so I made my point to a few folks individually
 It's beyond me how anyone can be familiar with Dank, listen to what he has to say (such as that speech), and come
 away thinking the dude's 'far right'. It's insanity, it is as though a portion of the left have abandoned critical thinking
 for cult-ideological thinking
 For example, when Dank says "I reject any notion of superiority or inferiority based on race, I reject the idea of an
 ethnostate, if you want to live here in peace you are welcome in this country..." Your response is what? That he's
 lying? That what he's saying isn't good enough? What would you have him do and say?
 You don't have to take anything I say at face value, nevertheless you do have a massive misconception that if
 someone complains about ((The Left)) that this infers some sort of guilt? I'm 34, I've been liberal since I first
 understood politics in my early teens. I believe that over time 'the left' has changed. I often see people who are
 supposed to be left-leaning arguing against and undermining free speech. A portion of the left are authoritarians, and
 it's completely valid to be critical of that.
 From my point of view, one of the problems with leftists of today is they often strawman people they don't like,
 assume the worst about people they don't like, and misuse and dis-empower all sorts of terms and labels. White
 supremacist, misogynist, islamophobe, nazi, have all become catch-all terms for anyone right of far left, in quite
 frankly far too many left-wing circles, and shutting down the ability of people generally to discuss serious issues witlh
 any nuance. The press in particular has a large part of the blame. The video game moral panic, for example, is largely
 the press's fault.
 So in summary - you dislike Straw-Dank, not the real Dank. Unless you can coherently explain valid reasons for
 disliking the real Dank
 permalink delete report block user mark unread reply
 sent 11 hours ago
 Why didn't you answer my very specific question.
 permalink

 sent 10 hours ago
 Ok just so I have you correct; anything short of actual ethnic cleansing makes you a "liberal", yes or no?
 Pro immigration, ok, fine, but historically "boot out all the darkies" was more of a moderate stance, not necessarily
 the cry of the bleeding heart.
 More to your (repeated, jesus christ...) point, yeah, I think Dankyboi is much more comfortable with paling around
 with le far right than a ton of liberals generally are. Now you've gone on quite a tirade there about how that's
 ackshually just coz he likes free speech so much! But you tap danced all all the initial point that pissed you off enough
 to PM in the first place; it's literally always some
 and it's never a matter of what they actually did, but of an extremist force forcing them to "leave the left!".
 Consistently, this has been the case with most of the GamerGate types. How many admitted Conservative
 GamerGaters do you see? I know of, like, 3. the rest all claim to be "liberal". Oh, they can't tell you much of anything
 iberal leanings they have, how many liberal politicians they support or have supported in the past, and they all fall in
 lock-step with more brazenly right wing vloggers and columnists. Most of you championing this as all of you coming
 together under a multitude of different political background and ideologies and "beating back the extremists!", but it
 seems to be the lot of you simply don't understand- or have only the vaguest understanding of- "liberalism". George
 elses fault when the
 pe
 ple find themselves in a controversy
 ubya Bush wanted a "more fair" immigration process, Ronald Reagan outright gave amnesty. Were those gentlemen
 "liberal" Presidents?
 Indeed I've yet to see Dankula or any "actually liberal" critique any right wing commentator or argument of
 substance. Barring, again, "an ethnostate is bad". The problem there is an "ethnostate" isn't a realistic political option
 for anyone outside of/pol/. His big brave stand against the extremist right is essentially one thing, that there's zero
 realistic danger of happening in the first place. He's to be given credit for that? Does he have anything to say about
 racist attacks towards Londons mayor? He seems very friendly with Tommy Robinson, the same man who did this
 What am I to make of that?
 Mr Dank also has repeatedly repeatedly referred to himself as "edgy" and a "shitposter", terms you're surely familiar
 with. A man who enjoys getting a rise out of people. We now have demonstrated as someone who both enjoys his
 "absolute" free speech, and pals around with undeniably far-right figures. Do you not understand how his antics there
 and explicit support for others doing similar things. Racism is merely a tool to be "played with" to rile up some
 extremists, is that right? Am I not allowed to consider Captain Danky sort of an asshole for doing this?
 In summation;
 1. I do not believe Dankybois brief pandering towards "liking immigration" counts as solid liberalism especially
 be
 2. He's admittedl
 nd himself very
 comfortable with fa
 right figu
 much more so than any other "moderate
 3. Combining poi
 part du
 nd him
 0
 nd da
 round his own D
 ngs
 persona, making him
 ympathies bu
 f his "edgy shit
 ort of a dipshit
 4. I did
 I him "right wing
 po
 off so bad. Ev
 ed him a dickhead and a do
 omethi
 eba
 here and
 spe
 ing trying to "debate me" ou
 ng
 I didn
 perm

 from
 sent 10 hours ago
 You failed to answer my direct question. Is Dank actually far right?
 It's getting late here, there's a lot in your post that is misconception, ignorance, and exactly what I talked about
 earlier which is interpreting things in the most ungenerous way possible. This,
 Ok just so I have you correct; anything short of actual ethnic cleansing makes you a "liberal", yes or no?
 This speaks volumes about your ideology. Supporting sensible immigration isn't 'short of actual ethnic cleansing'. Wtf
 are you talking about? The last thing I think if someone says the SUPPORT immigration, is 'that individual is JUST
 SHORT OF ENDORSING ETHNIC CLEANSING!!'
 Good arief.
 Also, guilt by association is a fallacy. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/Ip/Bo/LogicalFallacies/10/Ad-Hominem-
 Guilt-by-Association
 Also, you're just ignorant about the actual positions of people who support GamerGate. There isn't anything wrong
 with ignorance in and of itself, it's not entirely your fault. As I said, the press has a lot of share of the blame. Still
 some willful ignorance is definitely at play here
 Award winning journalist and his research: http://www.gameobjective.com/2016/11/21/no-gamergate-is-not-right-
 wing
 I took part in that study, by the way, and part of the study was specifically asking which parties/candidates you vote
 or
 I'll address this further tomorrow.
 permalink delete report block user mark unread reply
 to
 sent 9 hours ago
 Is Dank actually far right?
 I think so, yeah
 permalink
 from
 sent 4 hours ago
 Best case for why? Specific quotes and actions that support this? Which of his positions are far right?
 permalink delete report block user mark unread reply
 to
 I just told you
 So this is seriously what you guys think is good "debating"? Like this is your best tactic to stop the press attacks
 against you? Surprising motherfuckers in DMs and hoping you bombard them with enough bullshit that they just
 admit "I... I uh.. I don't know... I guess he's NOT?!".? Is this the plan of attack?
 sent 2 minutes ago
 permalink
34 year old GamerGate guy demands prolonged debate via PM after stumbling across me bashing a favorite vlogger on Reddit

34 year old GamerGate guy demands prolonged debate via PM after stumbling across me bashing a favorite vlogger on Reddit

race wars: ABC7 News . abc7 Headlines matter Follow YouTube in WATCH LIVE: Sh #SanBruno wearing dark top and headsca elieved to be white female adult abc7ne.ws/2q3VPGj neath GLIVE SKY7 0 -380 Mainstream Media (CNN-FOX) is fast to label people as "white" Alt Media" aka, youtube and forms label attacks as truth, asap. e.g, white liberal attacks republican senator POLICE: ACTIVE SHOOTER AT 41 PM-3 Apr 2018 Ann Coulter #AnnCoulter Following The longer we go without being told the race of the shooters, the less likely it is to be white men. #sorryNYT 4:17 PM-2 Dec 2015 Coulters Law 1.822 Retweets 2,807 Likes NBC News Follow JUST IN: Suspected YouTube shooter has been identified as Nasim Najafi Aghdam, multiple law enforcement officials tells @NBCNews and @nbcbayarea You Tube shooting: Female suspect dead, three wounded at firm's HO in San. The woman appeared to have kolled herseir and three other people were being treated for gunshot wounds, polIce said @ABC You race to blame white people, are you trying to create more divide in America? ABC Where is your correction? Several assaulted, robbed a 6abc.com Resay Bunch of blacks attack only white people at center mall that left some without their ABC we noticed you label a bunch of black people as "een" or Youthfu" when they attack whites? ABC are you trying to create a race war divide? Morning Mib Hate crime charges filed after 'reprehensible' video shows attack on mentally ill man in Chicago Bunch of blacks scalp white mentaly ill kid and make him drink toilet water By Mark Berman and Derek Hawkins lanuary5, 201 Cmalthesthor Vicious attack broadcast live on F Embed <h Share Four people are in custody in Chicego aaack on a young man with "mental health chalienges" was broadcast live on Facelbook Chicago Police Follow CPD Arrested and Charged all four offenders with Hate Crime, as well as other charges from West Side kidnapping and attack. Presser@2:15 Enough is Enough! STOP THE RACE WAR
race wars: ABC7 News .
 abc7
 Headlines matter Follow
 YouTube in
 WATCH LIVE: Sh
 #SanBruno
 wearing dark top and headsca
 elieved to be white female adult
 abc7ne.ws/2q3VPGj
 neath GLIVE SKY7
 0
 -380
 Mainstream Media (CNN-FOX) is fast to label people as "white"
 Alt Media" aka, youtube and forms label attacks as truth, asap.
 e.g, white liberal attacks republican senator
 POLICE: ACTIVE SHOOTER AT
 41 PM-3 Apr 2018
 Ann Coulter
 #AnnCoulter
 Following
 The longer we go without being told the race
 of the shooters, the less likely it is to be white
 men. #sorryNYT
 4:17 PM-2 Dec 2015
 Coulters Law
 1.822 Retweets 2,807 Likes
 NBC News
 Follow
 JUST IN: Suspected YouTube shooter has
 been identified as Nasim Najafi Aghdam,
 multiple law enforcement officials tells
 @NBCNews and @nbcbayarea
 You Tube shooting: Female suspect dead, three wounded at firm's HO in San.
 The woman appeared to have kolled herseir and three other people were being
 treated for gunshot wounds, polIce said
 @ABC You race to blame white people, are you trying to create
 more divide in America?
 ABC Where is your correction?
 Several assaulted, robbed a
 6abc.com
 Resay Bunch of blacks attack only white people at center mall
 that left some without their
 ABC we noticed you label a bunch of black people as "een" or Youthfu" when they attack whites?
 ABC are you trying to create a race war divide?
 Morning Mib
 Hate crime charges filed after 'reprehensible'
 video shows attack on mentally ill man in
 Chicago
 Bunch of blacks scalp white mentaly ill kid and make him drink toilet water
 By Mark Berman and Derek Hawkins lanuary5, 201
 Cmalthesthor
 Vicious attack broadcast live on F
 Embed
 <h Share
 Four people are in custody in Chicego aaack on a young man with "mental health chalienges" was broadcast live on Facelbook
 Chicago Police
 Follow
 CPD Arrested and Charged all four offenders
 with Hate Crime, as well as other charges
 from West Side kidnapping and attack.
 Presser@2:15
 Enough is Enough! STOP THE
 RACE WAR