🔥 | Latest

scanners: honestmerchantsailor: passivity: Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canisters and if this got shared to all those protesting… Would be a further shame if people started covering cameras (as seen in Hong Kong, with protestors using poles and rakes to lift cardboard boxes over security cameras), blinding drone optics with laser pointers, and flooding police-run reporting apps with junk data. It would be a shame if the protesters noted that plainclothes cops can be identified a number of ways, such as wearing steel-toed boots; an armband or wristband of a particular color; driving white, black, or dark blue cars with concealed lights; or having the outline of cuffs visible in the back pocket or the bumps of an armor vest’s shoulder straps under their shirt. It would be a shame if the protesters began making their signs out of inch-thick plywood to stop rubber bullets, forming a tight shield wall to prevent police from singling out and mobbing individual protesters. It would be a shame if the people behind the shield wall held up umbrellas so that tear gas canisters fired over the heads of the front line will be bounced away. It would be a shame if protesters began constructing improvised armor vests out of duct tape, hardback books, and ceramic tiles. It would be a shame if protesters started wearing safety glasses, hard hats, respirators, and gardening gloves, all of which can be found at the same hardware stores as the plywood. It would be a shame if they started using traffic cones (the kind without the hole in the top) upside-down buckets, or other improvised lids to contain tear gas by placing them over the canisters. It would be a shame if protesters learned that police scanners are legal to own in the US, allowing them to learn where police are moving and what routes they intend to take. It would be a shame if they discovered that these scanners can be used to send as well as receive, allowing them to flood the scanner frequencies with noise. All this would be a terrible, terrible shame.
scanners: honestmerchantsailor:
passivity:
Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canisters and if this got shared to all those protesting…
Would be a further shame if people started covering cameras (as seen in Hong Kong, with protestors using poles and rakes to lift cardboard boxes over security cameras), blinding drone optics with laser pointers, and flooding police-run reporting apps with junk data.
It would be a shame if the protesters noted that plainclothes cops can be identified a number of ways, such as wearing steel-toed boots; an armband or wristband of a particular color; driving white, black, or dark blue cars with concealed lights; or having the outline of cuffs visible in the back pocket or the bumps of an armor vest’s shoulder straps under their shirt.
It would be a shame if the protesters began making their signs out of inch-thick plywood to stop rubber bullets, forming a tight shield wall to prevent police from singling out and mobbing individual protesters. It would be a shame if the people behind the shield wall held up umbrellas so that tear gas canisters fired over the heads of the front line will be bounced away. It would be a shame if protesters began constructing improvised armor vests out of duct tape, hardback books, and ceramic tiles.
It would be a shame if protesters started wearing safety glasses, hard hats, respirators, and gardening gloves, all of which can be found at the same hardware stores as the plywood. It would be a shame if they started using traffic cones (the kind without the hole in the top) upside-down buckets, or other improvised lids to contain tear gas by placing them over the canisters.
It would be a shame if protesters learned that police scanners are legal to own in the US, allowing them to learn where police are moving and what routes they intend to take. It would be a shame if they discovered that these scanners can be used to send as well as receive, allowing them to flood the scanner frequencies with noise.
All this would be a terrible, terrible shame.

honestmerchantsailor: passivity: Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canister...

scanners: caitas-cooing: wendell-or-something: honestmerchantsailor: passivity: Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canisters and if this got shared to all those protesting… Would be a further shame if people started covering cameras (as seen in Hong Kong, with protestors using poles and rakes to lift cardboard boxes over security cameras), blinding drone optics with laser pointers, and flooding police-run reporting apps with junk data. It would be a shame if the protesters noted that plainclothes cops can be identified a number of ways, such as wearing steel-toed boots; an armband or wristband of a particular color; driving white, black, or dark blue cars with concealed lights; or having the outline of cuffs visible in the back pocket or the bumps of an armor vest’s shoulder straps under their shirt. It would be a shame if the protesters began making their signs out of inch-thick plywood to stop rubber bullets, forming a tight shield wall to prevent police from singling out and mobbing individual protesters. It would be a shame if the people behind the shield wall held up umbrellas so that tear gas canisters fired over the heads of the front line will be bounced away. It would be a shame if protesters began constructing improvised armor vests out of duct tape, hardback books, and ceramic tiles. It would be a shame if protesters started wearing safety glasses, hard hats, respirators, and gardening gloves, all of which can be found at the same hardware stores as the plywood. It would be a shame if they started using traffic cones (the kind without the hole in the top) upside-down buckets, or other improvised lids to contain tear gas by placing them over the canisters. It would be a shame if protesters learned that police scanners are legal to own in the US, allowing them to learn where police are moving and what routes they intend to take. It would be a shame if they discovered that these scanners can be used to send as well as receive, allowing them to flood the scanner frequencies with noise. All this would be a terrible, terrible shame. a word of caution about the plywood though… I just reblogged a post earlier today saying that if a rubber bullet hits that and shatters it, the splinters can put you in more danger. depending on how you’re holding it up, it can also damage your arm if you’ve strapped it on somehow, and carrying a shield can make you a target for them to shoot things at, so it might actually be safer on the whole if you don’t try to construct a shield, counter intuitive though that may seem. It’d be a shame if I reblogged this and people read it
scanners: caitas-cooing:

wendell-or-something:
honestmerchantsailor:

passivity:
Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canisters and if this got shared to all those protesting…
Would be a further shame if people started covering cameras (as seen in Hong Kong, with protestors using poles and rakes to lift cardboard boxes over security cameras), blinding drone optics with laser pointers, and flooding police-run reporting apps with junk data.
It would be a shame if the protesters noted that plainclothes cops can be identified a number of ways, such as wearing steel-toed boots; an armband or wristband of a particular color; driving white, black, or dark blue cars with concealed lights; or having the outline of cuffs visible in the back pocket or the bumps of an armor vest’s shoulder straps under their shirt.
It would be a shame if the protesters began making their signs out of inch-thick plywood to stop rubber bullets, forming a tight shield wall to prevent police from singling out and mobbing individual protesters. It would be a shame if the people behind the shield wall held up umbrellas so that tear gas canisters fired over the heads of the front line will be bounced away. It would be a shame if protesters began constructing improvised armor vests out of duct tape, hardback books, and ceramic tiles.
It would be a shame if protesters started wearing safety glasses, hard hats, respirators, and gardening gloves, all of which can be found at the same hardware stores as the plywood. It would be a shame if they started using traffic cones (the kind without the hole in the top) upside-down buckets, or other improvised lids to contain tear gas by placing them over the canisters.
It would be a shame if protesters learned that police scanners are legal to own in the US, allowing them to learn where police are moving and what routes they intend to take. It would be a shame if they discovered that these scanners can be used to send as well as receive, allowing them to flood the scanner frequencies with noise.
All this would be a terrible, terrible shame.



a word of caution about the plywood though… I just reblogged a post earlier today saying that if a rubber bullet hits that and shatters it, the splinters can put you in more danger. depending on how you’re holding it up, it can also damage your arm if you’ve strapped it on somehow, and carrying a shield can make you a target for them to shoot things at, so it might actually be safer on the whole if you don’t try to construct a shield, counter intuitive though that may seem.



It’d be a shame if I reblogged this and people read it

caitas-cooing: wendell-or-something: honestmerchantsailor: passivity: Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves...

scanners: honestmerchantsailor: passivity: Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canisters and if this got shared to all those protesting… Would be a further shame if people started covering cameras (as seen in Hong Kong, with protestors using poles and rakes to lift cardboard boxes over security cameras), blinding drone optics with laser pointers, and flooding police-run reporting apps with junk data. It would be a shame if the protesters noted that plainclothes cops can be identified a number of ways, such as wearing steel-toed boots; an armband or wristband of a particular color; driving white, black, or dark blue cars with concealed lights; or having the outline of cuffs visible in the back pocket or the bumps of an armor vest’s shoulder straps under their shirt. It would be a shame if the protesters began making their signs out of inch-thick plywood to stop rubber bullets, forming a tight shield wall to prevent police from singling out and mobbing individual protesters. It would be a shame if the people behind the shield wall held up umbrellas so that tear gas canisters fired over the heads of the front line will be bounced away. It would be a shame if protesters began constructing improvised armor vests out of duct tape, hardback books, and ceramic tiles. It would be a shame if protesters started wearing safety glasses, hard hats, respirators, and gardening gloves, all of which can be found at the same hardware stores as the plywood. It would be a shame if they started using traffic cones (the kind without the hole in the top) upside-down buckets, or other improvised lids to contain tear gas by placing them over the canisters. It would be a shame if protesters learned that police scanners are legal to own in the US, allowing them to learn where police are moving and what routes they intend to take. It would be a shame if they discovered that these scanners can be used to send as well as receive, allowing them to flood the scanner frequencies with noise. All this would be a terrible, terrible shame.
scanners: honestmerchantsailor:

passivity:
Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas canisters and if this got shared to all those protesting…
Would be a further shame if people started covering cameras (as seen in Hong Kong, with protestors using poles and rakes to lift cardboard boxes over security cameras), blinding drone optics with laser pointers, and flooding police-run reporting apps with junk data.
It would be a shame if the protesters noted that plainclothes cops can be identified a number of ways, such as wearing steel-toed boots; an armband or wristband of a particular color; driving white, black, or dark blue cars with concealed lights; or having the outline of cuffs visible in the back pocket or the bumps of an armor vest’s shoulder straps under their shirt.
It would be a shame if the protesters began making their signs out of inch-thick plywood to stop rubber bullets, forming a tight shield wall to prevent police from singling out and mobbing individual protesters. It would be a shame if the people behind the shield wall held up umbrellas so that tear gas canisters fired over the heads of the front line will be bounced away. It would be a shame if protesters began constructing improvised armor vests out of duct tape, hardback books, and ceramic tiles.
It would be a shame if protesters started wearing safety glasses, hard hats, respirators, and gardening gloves, all of which can be found at the same hardware stores as the plywood. It would be a shame if they started using traffic cones (the kind without the hole in the top) upside-down buckets, or other improvised lids to contain tear gas by placing them over the canisters.
It would be a shame if protesters learned that police scanners are legal to own in the US, allowing them to learn where police are moving and what routes they intend to take. It would be a shame if they discovered that these scanners can be used to send as well as receive, allowing them to flood the scanner frequencies with noise.
All this would be a terrible, terrible shame.

honestmerchantsailor: passivity: Would also be really annoying if they wore heat resistant gloves to throw back the hot tear gas caniste...

scanners: NY AG Underwood @NewYorkStateAG To be clear, it was the Trump ad- min that decided to give criminals the tools to build untraceable, undetectable 3-D printed guns at the touch of a button That's why we sued. on.ny.gov 2LznSLv Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump I am looking into 3-D Plastic Guns being sold to the public. Already spoke to NRA, doesn't seem to make much sense! <p><a href="http://amalgamasreal.tumblr.com/post/176527642745/friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">amalgamasreal</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt.tumblr.com/post/176491719675/kasaron-1r3l4nd13-kasaron-1r3l4nd13" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://kasaron.tumblr.com/post/176491236610/1r3l4nd13-kasaron-1r3l4nd13-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">kasaron</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://1r3l4nd13.tumblr.com/post/176486816978/kasaron-1r3l4nd13-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">1r3l4nd13</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://kasaron.tumblr.com/post/176486495640/1r3l4nd13-kasaron-liberalsarecool-another" class="tumblr_blog">kasaron</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://1r3l4nd13.tumblr.com/post/176486223328/kasaron-liberalsarecool-another-trump-policy" class="tumblr_blog">1r3l4nd13</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://kasaron.tumblr.com/post/176486019980/liberalsarecool-another-trump-policy-creating" class="tumblr_blog">kasaron</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://liberalsarecool.com/post/176483209782/another-trump-policy-creating-the-worst-outcome" class="tumblr_blog">liberalsarecool</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Another <b>Trump</b> policy creating the worst outcome. #3DPrintedGuns</p> <p>Trump saying ‘it doesn’t make much sense’ should be his campaign slogan.</p> <p>The abdication to the NRA is GOP law.</p> </blockquote> <p>The tools to build 3D printed guns have existed since at least the Obama Administration.</p> <p style=""><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberator_(gun)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberator_(gun)</a><br/></p> <p style="">The gun was designed in 2013. </p> <p>The issue was not the existence of the gun itself, but the fact that if the Liberator (and other 3D printed gun files) were “weapons of war” that would possibly violate ITAR.</p> <p>That adjudication resulted in the government (and ITAR specifically) being sued by Cody Wilson. The government settled out of court and openly admitted their wrongdoing as part of the settlement. </p> <p>I will repeat; the 3D printing and manufacture of firearms was <i>never</i> illegal in the US, only the international distribution of the files themselves. Even the distribution of the files within US borders and possession of the files themselves are all and were all legal. </p> </blockquote> <p>I have no issues with people owning guns legally but I don’t think I’m ok with them being able to print a gun. </p> </blockquote> <p style="">Would you be willing to explain why?</p> </blockquote> <p>See, my reasons only make sense to me and the environment I grew up in but I don’t see a reason for an individual to be able to make a gun whenever they want. I know most probably won’t do anything illegal with the gun but I also think the gun might not be safe to use…I have never used a 3D gun or know much about them so they could be perfectly safe to use. </p> </blockquote> <p>Generally, polymer is a less than stellar material to make a gun out of; that’s why the Liberator is basically a single-shot low-power gun. It’s a proof of concept to show it Can Be Done and thereby challenge the idea of controlling ownership of firearms as a whole.</p> <p>Since it has been adjudicated that code (and files) are themselves a form of speech; sharing that “speech” in an open forum is, by default, legal and protected.</p> <p>The issue is, people (for a variety of reasons) already DO make untracable firearms, from 80% lowers, from raw stock, from scrap metal, etc. They’re rarely if ever used in criminal activities, mostly because criminals can just buy an illegal (but legitimately manufactured) firearm either which were illegally purchased themselves, stolen, or gotten thanks to programs like ATFs Fast and Furious and other gunwalking schemes.</p> </blockquote> <p>as for fears about criminals building untraceable guns, they can almost certainly do it better for cheaper with scrap metal &amp; metal working shop tools. 3d printers arent cheap &amp; polymer guns dont last, as <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/miMjDZnDWnZqZODmSVuibaw">@kasaron</a> has already noted. assuming that they dont just buy black market factory made guns, which are much better quality for much less effort.</p> <p>&amp; some people have this ridiculously idea that a polymer gun is totally undetectable by security scanners &amp; can be taken ANYWHERE. yeah, they arent, &amp; they still require metal bullets.</p> </blockquote> <p>Anyone who’s worried about 3d printed guns has <b>NEVER </b>actually had or used a 3d printer. I’ve got 5 of them, ranging from $300 chinese DIY kits to $4500 “prosumer” fully assembled devices, and not a single one can make a gun that I’d be willing to fire with any form of reliability or safety. The tolerances and durability just aren’t there. </p> <p>The best I could make would be that Liberator up there and the chances that it might just explode in my hand on the first shot aren’t low. </p> <p>The people who’ve made the fully functional AR lowers aren’t doing it using a 3D printer you can just buy off the shelf, they’d using industrial grade SLA resin printers that <b>START</b> in the 5 figures and if you want the metal additive printers you’re not walking away without spending 6 figures. At that price point they can just buy metal working equipment and make real metal guns by the dozen in the time it would take to print a single gun. </p> <p>Now: I can’t speak for the future, 3d printers might change, but the direction they’re moving in now does not lend to making guns in the least bit; and stifling the entire branch of technology out of idiotic fear of a possibility is the last thing we need to do.</p> <p>Also: THERE’S ALREADY OVER 300 MILLION GUNS IN THE US AND IT WOULD BE WAY EASIER AND CHEAPER TO JUST BUY/STEAL ONE OF THOSE THAN PRINT ONE. </p> </blockquote> <p>This is what I’m saying. The school I work at has a 3-D printer and by no means would it be capable of making a gun you would want to use. Not only would trying to prevent the program from being downloaded be an enormous waste of time, most criminals wouldn’t even be bothered with it when there are much easier ways to get a gun.</p>
scanners: NY AG Underwood
 @NewYorkStateAG
 To be clear, it was the Trump ad-
 min that decided to give criminals
 the tools to build untraceable,
 undetectable 3-D printed guns at
 the touch of a button
 That's why we sued. on.ny.gov
 2LznSLv
 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
 I am looking into 3-D Plastic Guns being sold to
 the public. Already spoke to NRA, doesn't seem
 to make much sense!
<p><a href="http://amalgamasreal.tumblr.com/post/176527642745/friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">amalgamasreal</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt.tumblr.com/post/176491719675/kasaron-1r3l4nd13-kasaron-1r3l4nd13" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kasaron.tumblr.com/post/176491236610/1r3l4nd13-kasaron-1r3l4nd13-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">kasaron</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://1r3l4nd13.tumblr.com/post/176486816978/kasaron-1r3l4nd13-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">1r3l4nd13</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kasaron.tumblr.com/post/176486495640/1r3l4nd13-kasaron-liberalsarecool-another" class="tumblr_blog">kasaron</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://1r3l4nd13.tumblr.com/post/176486223328/kasaron-liberalsarecool-another-trump-policy" class="tumblr_blog">1r3l4nd13</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kasaron.tumblr.com/post/176486019980/liberalsarecool-another-trump-policy-creating" class="tumblr_blog">kasaron</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://liberalsarecool.com/post/176483209782/another-trump-policy-creating-the-worst-outcome" class="tumblr_blog">liberalsarecool</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Another <b>Trump</b> policy creating the worst outcome. #3DPrintedGuns</p>

<p>Trump saying ‘it doesn’t make much sense’ should be his campaign slogan.</p>

<p>The abdication to the NRA is GOP law.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The tools to build 3D printed guns have existed since at least the Obama Administration.</p>
<p style=""><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberator_(gun)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberator_(gun)</a><br/></p>
<p style="">The gun was designed in 2013. </p>
<p>The issue was not the existence of the gun itself, but the fact that if the Liberator (and other 3D printed gun files) were “weapons of war” that would possibly violate ITAR.</p>
<p>That adjudication resulted in the government (and ITAR specifically) being sued by Cody Wilson. The government settled out of court and openly admitted their wrongdoing as part of the settlement. </p>
<p>I will repeat; the 3D printing and manufacture of firearms was <i>never</i> illegal in the US, only the international distribution of the files themselves. Even the distribution of the files within US borders and possession of the files themselves are all and were all legal. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>I have no issues with people owning guns legally but I don’t think I’m ok with them being able to print a gun. </p>
</blockquote>
<p style="">Would you be willing to explain why?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>See, my reasons only make sense to me and the environment I grew up in but I don’t see a reason for an individual to be able to make a gun whenever they want. I know most probably won’t do anything illegal with the gun but I also think the gun might not be safe to use…I have never used a 3D gun or know much about them so they could be perfectly safe to use. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Generally, polymer is a less than stellar material to make a gun out of; that’s why the Liberator is basically a single-shot low-power gun. It’s a proof of concept to show it Can Be Done and thereby challenge the idea of controlling ownership of firearms as a whole.</p>
<p>Since it has been adjudicated that code (and files) are themselves a form of speech; sharing that “speech” in an open forum is, by default, legal and protected.</p>
<p>The issue is, people (for a variety of reasons) already DO make untracable firearms, from 80% lowers, from raw stock, from scrap metal, etc. They’re rarely if ever used in criminal activities, mostly because criminals can just buy an illegal (but legitimately manufactured) firearm either which were illegally purchased themselves, stolen, or gotten thanks to programs like ATFs Fast and Furious and other gunwalking schemes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>as for fears about criminals building untraceable guns, they can almost certainly do it better for cheaper with scrap metal &amp; metal working shop tools. 3d printers arent cheap &amp; polymer guns dont last, as <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/miMjDZnDWnZqZODmSVuibaw">@kasaron</a> has already noted. assuming that they dont just buy black market factory made guns, which are much better quality for much less effort.</p>
<p>&amp; some people have this ridiculously idea that a polymer gun is totally undetectable by security scanners &amp; can be taken ANYWHERE. yeah, they arent, &amp; they still require metal bullets.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Anyone who’s worried about 3d printed guns has <b>NEVER </b>actually had or used a 3d printer. I’ve got 5 of them, ranging from $300 chinese DIY kits to $4500 “prosumer” fully assembled devices, and not a single one can make a gun that I’d be willing to fire with any form of reliability or safety. The tolerances and durability just aren’t there. </p>
<p>The best I could make would be that Liberator up there and the chances that it might just explode in my hand on the first shot aren’t low. </p>
<p>The people who’ve made the fully functional AR lowers aren’t doing it using a 3D printer you can just buy off the shelf, they’d using industrial grade SLA resin printers that <b>START</b> in the 5 figures and if you want the metal additive printers you’re not walking away without spending 6 figures. At that price point they can just buy metal working equipment and make real metal guns by the dozen in the time it would take to print a single gun. </p>
<p>Now: I can’t speak for the future, 3d printers might change, but the direction they’re moving in now does not lend to making guns in the least bit; and stifling the entire branch of technology out of idiotic fear of a possibility is the last thing we need to do.</p>
<p>Also: THERE’S ALREADY OVER 300 MILLION GUNS IN THE US AND IT WOULD BE WAY EASIER AND CHEAPER TO JUST BUY/STEAL ONE OF THOSE THAN PRINT ONE. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>This is what I’m saying. The school I work at has a 3-D printer and by no means would it be capable of making a gun you would want to use. Not only would trying to prevent the program from being downloaded be an enormous waste of time, most criminals wouldn’t even be bothered with it when there are much easier ways to get a gun.</p>

<p><a href="http://amalgamasreal.tumblr.com/post/176527642745/friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt-kasaron" class="tumblr_blog">amalgamasreal</...

scanners: infia 75 tech Samsung Galaxy S8, flagship pertama dari Samsung yang tak memiliki tombol home fisik dan bezel less, dibekali prose sor Snapdragon 835, kamera 12 MP (f/1.7), iris scanner, serta fitur mirip 3D Touch. Foto: Tech Radar Samsung Galaxy S8 dihadirkan dengan layar Super AMOLED 5,8 inci beresolusi 1440 x 2960 piksel (~570 ppi) yang dilindungi Corning Gorilla Glass 5. Smartphone ini juga tahan debu dan air hingga kedalaman 1,5 meter selama 30 menit berkat sertifikasi IP68. . Untuk jeroannya, ia ditunjang prosesor Snapdragon 835 octa core 2,35 GHz (pasar AS)-Exynos 8895 octa core 2,3 GHz (pasar global), RAM 4 GB, internal memory 64 GB, slot microSD card hingga 256 GB, dan baterai 3.000 mAh. . Untuk fotografi, Galaxy S8 ditunjang kamera utama 12 MP dengan bukaan lensa f-1.7, fitur PDAF dengan laser, OIS, 1.4 µm pixel size, 1-2.55" sensor size, dual-pixel sensor, serta LED flash. . Di bagian depan, terdapat kamera selfie 8 MP f-1.7, 1.22µm pixel size, 1-3.6" sensor size, yang dibekali fitur autofocus, dan bidang pandang 80 derajat. Ada juga fitur iris scanner. . Selain itu, S8 menjalankan OS Android Nougat, dilengkapi fitur face recognition, mendukung wireless charging, dibekali asisten virtual cerdas Samsung Bixby, serta serta bonus headphone AKG. . Tersedia dalam warna Midnight Black, Orchid Gray, Arctic Silver, Coral Blue, dan Maple Gold, Samsung Galaxy S8 dibanderol seharga Rp 10 jutaan.
scanners: infia
 75
 tech
 Samsung Galaxy S8, flagship pertama
 dari Samsung yang tak memiliki tombol
 home fisik dan bezel less, dibekali prose
 sor Snapdragon 835, kamera 12 MP
 (f/1.7), iris scanner, serta fitur mirip 3D
 Touch.
 Foto: Tech Radar
Samsung Galaxy S8 dihadirkan dengan layar Super AMOLED 5,8 inci beresolusi 1440 x 2960 piksel (~570 ppi) yang dilindungi Corning Gorilla Glass 5. Smartphone ini juga tahan debu dan air hingga kedalaman 1,5 meter selama 30 menit berkat sertifikasi IP68. . Untuk jeroannya, ia ditunjang prosesor Snapdragon 835 octa core 2,35 GHz (pasar AS)-Exynos 8895 octa core 2,3 GHz (pasar global), RAM 4 GB, internal memory 64 GB, slot microSD card hingga 256 GB, dan baterai 3.000 mAh. . Untuk fotografi, Galaxy S8 ditunjang kamera utama 12 MP dengan bukaan lensa f-1.7, fitur PDAF dengan laser, OIS, 1.4 µm pixel size, 1-2.55" sensor size, dual-pixel sensor, serta LED flash. . Di bagian depan, terdapat kamera selfie 8 MP f-1.7, 1.22µm pixel size, 1-3.6" sensor size, yang dibekali fitur autofocus, dan bidang pandang 80 derajat. Ada juga fitur iris scanner. . Selain itu, S8 menjalankan OS Android Nougat, dilengkapi fitur face recognition, mendukung wireless charging, dibekali asisten virtual cerdas Samsung Bixby, serta serta bonus headphone AKG. . Tersedia dalam warna Midnight Black, Orchid Gray, Arctic Silver, Coral Blue, dan Maple Gold, Samsung Galaxy S8 dibanderol seharga Rp 10 jutaan.

Samsung Galaxy S8 dihadirkan dengan layar Super AMOLED 5,8 inci beresolusi 1440 x 2960 piksel (~570 ppi) yang dilindungi Corning Gorilla...

scanners: New folder HED7BA470- 8E54-465E- 825C 997 12043E01 Mode Name Choose how to report problems Fix problems with your computer Restore our computer to an ea er time Review your computer's status and resolve issues View all problem reports View message archive View ecent messages about your computer View recommended actions to keep Windows running smooth View reliability history View solutions to problems View the Microsoft error eporting privacy statement online 4 Administrative Tools (10) Create and format hard disk partitions Defragment your hard drive Diagnose yr s memory problems our computer Edit group policy How to add new hardware Schedule tasks Set up data sources (ODBC) et up iscSI initiator View event logs View local services AutoPlay (3) Change default settings for media or devices Ed Play CDs or other media automatica d Start or stop using autoplay for a media and devices s Backup and Restore (2) Back up your computer Restore data, files, or computer from backup Color Management (1) n Change advanced color management settings for displays, scanners, and printers 4 Credential Manager (1) Manage Windows credentials Date and Time (4) Application Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Action Center Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools Administrative Tools AutoPlay AutoPlay AutoPlay Backup and Restore Backup and Restore Color Management Credential Manager GOD Mode Windows
scanners: New folder

 HED7BA470-
 8E54-465E-
 825C
 997 12043E01

 Mode

 Name
 Choose how to report problems
 Fix problems with your computer
 Restore
 our computer to an ea
 er time
 Review your computer's status and resolve issues
 View all problem reports
 View message archive
 View
 ecent messages about your computer
 View recommended actions to keep Windows running smooth
 View reliability history
 View solutions to problems
 View the Microsoft error
 eporting privacy statement online
 4 Administrative Tools (10)
 Create and format hard disk partitions
 Defragment your hard drive
 Diagnose yr
 s memory problems
 our computer
 Edit group policy
 How to add new hardware
 Schedule tasks
 Set up data sources (ODBC)
 et up iscSI initiator
 View event logs
 View local services
 AutoPlay (3)
 Change default settings for media or devices
 Ed Play CDs or other media automatica
 d Start or stop using autoplay for a
 media and devices
 s Backup and Restore (2)
 Back up your computer
 Restore data, files, or computer from backup
 Color Management (1)
 n Change advanced color management settings for displays, scanners, and printers
 4 Credential Manager (1)
 Manage Windows credentials
 Date and Time (4)
 Application
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Action Center
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 Administrative Tools
 AutoPlay
 AutoPlay
 AutoPlay
 Backup and Restore
 Backup and Restore
 Color Management
 Credential Manager
GOD Mode Windows

GOD Mode Windows

scanners: Muncul bocoran terbaru mengenai Sam sung Galaxy S8, yang mengungkap tampilan asli, spesifikasi detail, tanggal peluncuran dan harganya. Foto: Venture Beat Dilansir GSM Arena, kabar ini datang dari Evan Blass, orang yang seringkali memberikan bocoran akurat mengenai smartphone baru. . Seperti kabar sebelumnya, Samsung Galaxy S8 akan dihadirkan dengan dua versi, yang pertama memiliki layar 5,8 inci, dan satunya lagi lebih besar yakni dengan layar 6,2 inci. Keduanya mengusung layar Super AMOLED dengan lengkung di bagian sisi. Layar S8 juga memiliki fitur mirip 3D Touch, namun hanya di bagian bawahnya. . Versi yang lebih kecil akan dibekali baterai 3.000 mAh, dan versi layar besar dilengkapi baterai 3.500 mAh. Untuk dapur pacu, keduanya akan ditunjang chipset Snapdragon 835 atau Exynos terbaru, yang dipadukan dengan RAM 4 GB, dan internal memory 64 GB yang dapat diperluas dengan kartu microSD. . Di sektor kamera, smartphone ini bakal ditunjang kamera utama 12 MP f-1.7. Kamera belakang ini dilengkapi fitur pencarian visual dengan ikon yang memungkinkan pengguna melakukan pencarian web pada teks di foto, ataupun pencarian situs belana online untuk suatu produk yang menarik. Sedangkan, di bagian depan terdapat kamera selfie 8 MP dengan iris scanner. . Selain itu, flagship terbaru dari Samsung ini dilengkapi dengan sensor sidik jari di sebelah kamera belakang, USB Type-C, dan menjalankan OS Android Nougat. . Samsung Galaxy S8 rencananya akan diperkenalkan pada 29 Maret 2017 mendatang, dengan harga sekitar Rp 11,3 juta (5,8 inci) dan Rp 12,8 juta (6,2 inci). infia infiatech
scanners: Muncul bocoran terbaru mengenai Sam
 sung Galaxy S8, yang mengungkap
 tampilan asli, spesifikasi detail, tanggal
 peluncuran dan harganya.
 Foto: Venture Beat
Dilansir GSM Arena, kabar ini datang dari Evan Blass, orang yang seringkali memberikan bocoran akurat mengenai smartphone baru. . Seperti kabar sebelumnya, Samsung Galaxy S8 akan dihadirkan dengan dua versi, yang pertama memiliki layar 5,8 inci, dan satunya lagi lebih besar yakni dengan layar 6,2 inci. Keduanya mengusung layar Super AMOLED dengan lengkung di bagian sisi. Layar S8 juga memiliki fitur mirip 3D Touch, namun hanya di bagian bawahnya. . Versi yang lebih kecil akan dibekali baterai 3.000 mAh, dan versi layar besar dilengkapi baterai 3.500 mAh. Untuk dapur pacu, keduanya akan ditunjang chipset Snapdragon 835 atau Exynos terbaru, yang dipadukan dengan RAM 4 GB, dan internal memory 64 GB yang dapat diperluas dengan kartu microSD. . Di sektor kamera, smartphone ini bakal ditunjang kamera utama 12 MP f-1.7. Kamera belakang ini dilengkapi fitur pencarian visual dengan ikon yang memungkinkan pengguna melakukan pencarian web pada teks di foto, ataupun pencarian situs belana online untuk suatu produk yang menarik. Sedangkan, di bagian depan terdapat kamera selfie 8 MP dengan iris scanner. . Selain itu, flagship terbaru dari Samsung ini dilengkapi dengan sensor sidik jari di sebelah kamera belakang, USB Type-C, dan menjalankan OS Android Nougat. . Samsung Galaxy S8 rencananya akan diperkenalkan pada 29 Maret 2017 mendatang, dengan harga sekitar Rp 11,3 juta (5,8 inci) dan Rp 12,8 juta (6,2 inci). infia infiatech

Dilansir GSM Arena, kabar ini datang dari Evan Blass, orang yang seringkali memberikan bocoran akurat mengenai smartphone baru. . Seperti...