🔥 | Latest

Children, Cute, and Facts: pervocracy child handling for the childless urse My current job has me working with children, which is kind of a weird shock after years in environments where a young" patient is 40 years old. Here's my impressions so far Birth 1 year: Essentially a smail cute animal. Handle accordingly, gently and affectionately, but relying heavily on the caregivers and with no real expectation of cooperation Age 1-2: Hates you. Hates you so much. You can smile, you can coo, you can attempt to soothe they hate you anyway, because you're a stranger and you're scary and you're touching them. There's no winning this so just get it over with as quickly and non-traumatically as possible Age 3-5: Nervous around medical things, but possible to soothe. Easily upset but also easily distracted from the thing that upset them. Smartphone cartoons and who wants a stickerrl1?1? are key management techniques Age 6 10: Really cool, actually. I did not realize kids were this cool. Around this age they tend to be fairly outgoing, and super curious and eager to learn. Absolutely do not babytalk, instead, flatter them with how grown-up they are teach them some Fun Gross Medical Facts, and introduce potentially frightening experiences with hey, you want to see something really cool?" Age 11 14: Extremely variable. Can be very childish or very mature, or rapidly switch from one mode to the other. At this point you can almost treat them as an adult, just... a really sensitive and unpredictable adult Do not, under any circumstances, offer stickers. (But they might grab one out of the bin anyway.) Age 15-18: Basically an adult with severely limited life experience. Treat as an adult who needs a littie extra education with their care. Keep parents out of the room as much as possible, unless the kid wants them there. At this point you can go ahead and offer stickers again, because they'll probably think it's funny And they'll want one. Deep down, everyone wants a sticker nurse unlocks secret to raising kids
Children, Cute, and Facts: pervocracy
 child handling for the childless
 urse
 My current job has me working with children, which is kind of a weird shock after
 years in environments where a young" patient is 40 years old. Here's my
 impressions so far
 Birth 1 year: Essentially a smail cute animal. Handle accordingly, gently and
 affectionately, but relying heavily on the caregivers and with no real expectation
 of cooperation
 Age 1-2: Hates you. Hates you so much. You can smile, you can coo, you can
 attempt to soothe they hate you anyway, because you're a stranger and you're
 scary and you're touching them. There's no winning this so just get it over with
 as quickly and non-traumatically as possible
 Age 3-5: Nervous around medical things, but possible to soothe. Easily upset
 but also easily distracted from the thing that upset them. Smartphone cartoons
 and who wants a stickerrl1?1? are key management techniques
 Age 6 10: Really cool, actually. I did not realize kids were this cool. Around
 this age they tend to be fairly outgoing, and super curious and eager to learn.
 Absolutely do not babytalk, instead, flatter them with how grown-up they are
 teach them some Fun Gross Medical Facts, and introduce potentially frightening
 experiences with hey, you want to see something really cool?"
 Age 11 14: Extremely variable. Can be very childish or very mature, or rapidly
 switch from one mode to the other. At this point you can almost treat them as an
 adult, just... a really sensitive and unpredictable adult Do not, under any
 circumstances, offer stickers. (But they might grab one out of the bin anyway.)
 Age 15-18: Basically an adult with severely limited life experience. Treat as an
 adult who needs a littie extra education with their care. Keep parents out of the
 room as much as possible, unless the kid wants them there. At this point you
 can go ahead and offer stickers again, because they'll probably think it's funny
 And they'll want one. Deep down, everyone wants a sticker
nurse unlocks secret to raising kids

nurse unlocks secret to raising kids

Troll, Been, and The Wall: Props to the troll that put this sticker on the wall in a busy airport terminal. Been here for 10 minutes and have seen 5 people try it. Cruel.
Troll, Been, and The Wall: Props to the troll that put this sticker on the wall in a busy airport terminal. Been here for 10 minutes and have seen 5 people try it. Cruel.

Props to the troll that put this sticker on the wall in a busy airport terminal. Been here for 10 minutes and have seen 5 people try it. Cru...

Troll, Been, and The Wall: Props to the troll that put this sticker on the wall in a busy airport terminal. Been here for 10 minutes and have seen 5 people try it. Cruel.
Troll, Been, and The Wall: Props to the troll that put this sticker on the wall in a busy airport terminal. Been here for 10 minutes and have seen 5 people try it. Cruel.

Props to the troll that put this sticker on the wall in a busy airport terminal. Been here for 10 minutes and have seen 5 people try it. Cru...

Arguing, cnn.com, and Driving: BuzzFeed News 2 hrs. BuzzFeetD NEWS A Texas woman who refused to remove a "Fuck Trump" decal from her truck after being called out by a sheriff on Facebook has been arrested on a previous outstanding warrant. TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR VOTING FOR HIM A Texas Woman Is In Jail After A Sheriff Called Out Her "Fuck Trump" Sticker On Facebook BuzzFeed Fonseca said that she and her husband ordered the giant, white sticker that boldly reads: "FUCK TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR VOTING FOR HIM" 11 months ago, telling CNN, "That's our opinion on him." While she said has been repeatedly stopped by law enforcement while driving the truck and received negative reactions, "particularly among older white men," she has refused to remove the decal legitimatelala: zurizaldun: justbewhereveryouare: gaylor-moon: lesbianrey: ok legend…. CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW THE RIGHT WILL KICK AND SCREAM AND CRY AND PISS THEMSELVES OVER THEIR SUPPOSED FREE SPEECH, CALLING OTHER PEOPLW SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES AND MAKING FUN OF SAFE SPACES? SO HOLD UP. SEVEREAL OF THESE SNOWFLAKES GOT MAD, AT A STICKER, A FUCKING STICKER PEOPLE,, SO MAD AT A STICKER THEY LITERALLY CALLED THE POLICE, AND TRIED TO ARREST THIS WOMEN,,, NAH DOG BUT LEFT LEANING PEOPLE ARE THE SENSITIVE ONES OHHHHHKAYYYY DUDE hey so I looked it up and she was released on bail, so that’s good. also, the police were trying to argue that she should be charged with DISORDERLY CONDUCT for this and the ACLU was just like… no. Y’all she added ANOTHER sticker saying fuck the sheriff who arrested her and she’s considering a civil rights lawsuit against him. Making all us Texans proud y’all. https://theslot.jezebel.com/woman-targeted-by-sheriff-for-fuck-trump-decal-says-fuc-1820612922 YOURE DOING AMAZING SWEETIE
Arguing, cnn.com, and Driving: BuzzFeed News
 2 hrs.
 BuzzFeetD
 NEWS
 A Texas woman who refused to remove a "Fuck
 Trump" decal from her truck after being called out by
 a sheriff on Facebook has been arrested on a previous
 outstanding warrant.
 TRUMP
 AND FUCK YOU
 FOR VOTING FOR HIM
 A Texas Woman Is In Jail After A Sheriff Called Out
 Her "Fuck Trump" Sticker On Facebook
 BuzzFeed

 Fonseca said that she and her husband ordered
 the giant, white sticker that boldly reads:
 "FUCK TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR
 VOTING FOR HIM" 11 months ago, telling
 CNN, "That's our opinion on him."
 While she said has been repeatedly stopped by
 law enforcement while driving the truck and
 received negative reactions, "particularly
 among older white men," she has refused to
 remove the decal
legitimatelala:

zurizaldun:

justbewhereveryouare:

gaylor-moon:

lesbianrey:
ok legend….
CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW THE RIGHT WILL KICK AND SCREAM AND CRY AND PISS THEMSELVES OVER THEIR SUPPOSED FREE SPEECH, CALLING OTHER PEOPLW SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES AND MAKING FUN OF SAFE SPACES? SO HOLD UP. SEVEREAL OF THESE SNOWFLAKES GOT MAD, AT A STICKER, A FUCKING STICKER PEOPLE,, SO MAD AT A STICKER THEY LITERALLY CALLED THE POLICE, AND TRIED TO ARREST THIS WOMEN,,, NAH DOG BUT LEFT LEANING PEOPLE ARE THE SENSITIVE ONES OHHHHHKAYYYY DUDE

hey so I looked it up and she was released on bail, so that’s good. also, the police were trying to argue that she should be charged with DISORDERLY CONDUCT for this and the ACLU was just like… no.

Y’all she added ANOTHER sticker saying fuck the sheriff who arrested her and she’s considering a civil rights lawsuit against him. Making all us Texans proud y’all. https://theslot.jezebel.com/woman-targeted-by-sheriff-for-fuck-trump-decal-says-fuc-1820612922


YOURE DOING AMAZING SWEETIE

legitimatelala: zurizaldun: justbewhereveryouare: gaylor-moon: lesbianrey: ok legend…. CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW THE RIGHT WILL KICK ...

Arguing, cnn.com, and Driving: BuzzFeed News 2 hrs. BuzzFeetD NEWS A Texas woman who refused to remove a "Fuck Trump" decal from her truck after being called out by a sheriff on Facebook has been arrested on a previous outstanding warrant. TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR VOTING FOR HIM A Texas Woman Is In Jail After A Sheriff Called Out Her "Fuck Trump" Sticker On Facebook BuzzFeed Fonseca said that she and her husband ordered the giant, white sticker that boldly reads: "FUCK TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR VOTING FOR HIM" 11 months ago, telling CNN, "That's our opinion on him." While she said has been repeatedly stopped by law enforcement while driving the truck and received negative reactions, "particularly among older white men," she has refused to remove the decal goodvibedtribe: legitimatelala: zurizaldun: justbewhereveryouare: gaylor-moon: lesbianrey: ok legend…. CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW THE RIGHT WILL KICK AND SCREAM AND CRY AND PISS THEMSELVES OVER THEIR SUPPOSED FREE SPEECH, CALLING OTHER PEOPLW SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES AND MAKING FUN OF SAFE SPACES? SO HOLD UP. SEVEREAL OF THESE SNOWFLAKES GOT MAD, AT A STICKER, A FUCKING STICKER PEOPLE,, SO MAD AT A STICKER THEY LITERALLY CALLED THE POLICE, AND TRIED TO ARREST THIS WOMEN,,, NAH DOG BUT LEFT LEANING PEOPLE ARE THE SENSITIVE ONES OHHHHHKAYYYY DUDE hey so I looked it up and she was released on bail, so that’s good. also, the police were trying to argue that she should be charged with DISORDERLY CONDUCT for this and the ACLU was just like… no. Y’all she added ANOTHER sticker saying fuck the sheriff who arrested her and she’s considering a civil rights lawsuit against him. Making all us Texans proud y’all. https://theslot.jezebel.com/woman-targeted-by-sheriff-for-fuck-trump-decal-says-fuc-1820612922 YOURE DOING AMAZING SWEETIE i ❤️ my pit bull
Arguing, cnn.com, and Driving: BuzzFeed News
 2 hrs.
 BuzzFeetD
 NEWS
 A Texas woman who refused to remove a "Fuck
 Trump" decal from her truck after being called out by
 a sheriff on Facebook has been arrested on a previous
 outstanding warrant.
 TRUMP
 AND FUCK YOU
 FOR VOTING FOR HIM
 A Texas Woman Is In Jail After A Sheriff Called Out
 Her "Fuck Trump" Sticker On Facebook
 BuzzFeed

 Fonseca said that she and her husband ordered
 the giant, white sticker that boldly reads:
 "FUCK TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR
 VOTING FOR HIM" 11 months ago, telling
 CNN, "That's our opinion on him."
 While she said has been repeatedly stopped by
 law enforcement while driving the truck and
 received negative reactions, "particularly
 among older white men," she has refused to
 remove the decal
goodvibedtribe:
legitimatelala:


zurizaldun:

justbewhereveryouare:

gaylor-moon:

lesbianrey:
ok legend….
CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW THE RIGHT WILL KICK AND SCREAM AND CRY AND PISS THEMSELVES OVER THEIR SUPPOSED FREE SPEECH, CALLING OTHER PEOPLW SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES AND MAKING FUN OF SAFE SPACES? SO HOLD UP. SEVEREAL OF THESE SNOWFLAKES GOT MAD, AT A STICKER, A FUCKING STICKER PEOPLE,, SO MAD AT A STICKER THEY LITERALLY CALLED THE POLICE, AND TRIED TO ARREST THIS WOMEN,,, NAH DOG BUT LEFT LEANING PEOPLE ARE THE SENSITIVE ONES OHHHHHKAYYYY DUDE

hey so I looked it up and she was released on bail, so that’s good. also, the police were trying to argue that she should be charged with DISORDERLY CONDUCT for this and the ACLU was just like… no.

Y’all she added ANOTHER sticker saying fuck the sheriff who arrested her and she’s considering a civil rights lawsuit against him. Making all us Texans proud y’all. https://theslot.jezebel.com/woman-targeted-by-sheriff-for-fuck-trump-decal-says-fuc-1820612922


YOURE DOING AMAZING SWEETIE


i ❤️ my pit bull

goodvibedtribe: legitimatelala: zurizaldun: justbewhereveryouare: gaylor-moon: lesbianrey: ok legend…. CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW THE...

Being Alone, Batman, and Books: LIBRARIAN HUMOR ISEE WHAT YOU DID THERE 0 dracophile: randomthingieshere: pheenixwright: invenblocker: pheenixwright: invenblocker: pheenixwright: invenblocker: forthefuns: follow forthefuns for more funny stuff Your honor! Please direct your attention towards the manga.As you can see there are small pieces of paper sticking out of every volume.But no such paper is sticking out of the Batman comic.The reason? The Batman book doesn’t belong to the library. The photographer put it there to take a picture. Once again making hasty assumptions, Wright?First of all, I’d like to direct the court’s attention to this particular spot, in the top right-hand corner.Notice how the words are blocking the top of the Batman book.With this in mind, how can you claim that there is “no such paper sticking out of the Batman comic”?! Say whaaaat?Well uhmLook at the size of the paper pieces, they’re all sticking pretty far out.If there was paper in the batman comic, it would be big enough to stick up over the text.And while gravity does exist, it probably won’t make the paper do a 90 degree turn and just lean horisontally left at the middle.Still grasping for straws, Wright?Hypothetically, if there were a paper there, this picture would not be able to prove its presence. I’ve taken the liberty of drawing a diagram to illustrate my point. We are faced with three possibilities. It is possible that (1) the paper was simply tucked in deeper than the others.Paper is a soft material, Wright. It’s not unreasonable for it to do a (2) 90 degree turn. Or perhaps, (3) a paper does not exist there at all. Either way, you cannot prove your client innocent without sufficient evidence.   Which, of course, is impossible thanks to the obtrusive words. I’m sorry Edgeworth.I concede that I can’t disprove theory 1But the image you submited for theory 2 is contradictory.Look at the tilt of the other papers. They clearly prove how much the paper would tilt.And theory 3 is my point! Why would the library’s book not have this piece of paper when the other library books do?While you still have thory 1, there is another contradiction.The books are not in alphabetical order, this proves that the batman comic was placed there specifically for the picture! Ack.(Perhaps I should’ve left the artistry to the forensic artist…)Now hold it right there! It doesn’t matter which direction the paper is going because it’s impossible to prove it even exists!Those theories are all the same! We do not have enough information to prove them. There could be an infinite amount of papers in there for all we know. I simply presented them only so that the court could better understand your baseless conjecture!… I suppose the order of the books do seem out of the ordinary. However, therein lies not just one possibility. Clearly, those are Japanese graphic novels, also known as “manga”. And the Batman comic book is a graphic novel, too, no?Seeing as it currently has only graphic novels in the shelf, it is possible that any other novels have simply not yet been restocked. Asserting whether or not this effect was deliberate is useless– there is no way of knowing if the photographer and the captioner are the same person, let alone their involvement in this picture.Face it Wright, you can’t prove any of these groundless accusations! Did everyone just ignore the library sticker?
Being Alone, Batman, and Books: LIBRARIAN HUMOR
 ISEE WHAT
 YOU DID THERE
 0
dracophile:

randomthingieshere:

pheenixwright:

invenblocker:

pheenixwright:

invenblocker:

pheenixwright:

invenblocker:

forthefuns:

follow forthefuns for more funny stuff

Your honor! Please direct your attention towards the manga.As you can see there are small pieces of paper sticking out of every volume.But no such paper is sticking out of the Batman comic.The reason? The Batman book doesn’t belong to the library. The photographer put it there to take a picture.

Once again making hasty assumptions, Wright?First of all, I’d like to direct the court’s attention to this particular spot, in the top right-hand corner.Notice how the words are blocking the top of the Batman book.With this in mind, how can you claim that there is “no such paper sticking out of the Batman comic”?!

Say whaaaat?Well uhmLook at the size of the paper pieces, they’re all sticking pretty far out.If there was paper in the batman comic, it would be big enough to stick up over the text.And while gravity does exist, it probably won’t make the paper do a 90 degree turn and just lean horisontally left at the middle.Still grasping for straws, Wright?Hypothetically, if there were a paper there, this picture would not be able to prove its presence. I’ve taken the liberty of drawing a diagram to illustrate my point. We are faced with three possibilities. It is possible that (1) the paper was simply tucked in deeper than the others.Paper is a soft material, Wright. It’s not unreasonable for it to do a (2) 90 degree turn. Or perhaps, (3) a paper does not exist there at all. Either way, you cannot prove your client innocent without sufficient evidence.  

Which, of course, is impossible thanks to the obtrusive words.



I’m sorry Edgeworth.I concede that I can’t disprove theory 1But the image you submited for theory 2 is contradictory.Look at the tilt of the other papers. They clearly prove how much the paper would tilt.And theory 3 is my point! Why would the library’s book not have this piece of paper when the other library books do?While you still have thory 1, there is another contradiction.The books are not in alphabetical order, this proves that the batman comic was placed there specifically for the picture!

Ack.(Perhaps I should’ve left the artistry to the forensic artist…)Now hold it right there! It doesn’t matter which direction the paper is going because it’s impossible to prove it even exists!Those theories are all the same! We do not have enough information to prove them. There could be an infinite amount of papers in there for all we know. I simply presented them only so that the court could better understand your baseless conjecture!… I suppose the order of the books do seem out of the ordinary. However, therein lies not just one possibility. Clearly, those are Japanese graphic novels, also known as “manga”. And the Batman comic book is a graphic novel, too, no?Seeing as it currently has only graphic novels in the shelf, it is possible that any other novels have simply not yet been restocked. Asserting whether or not this effect was deliberate is useless– there is no way of knowing if the photographer and the captioner are the same person, let alone their involvement in this picture.Face it Wright, you can’t prove any of these groundless accusations!

Did everyone just ignore the library sticker?

dracophile: randomthingieshere: pheenixwright: invenblocker: pheenixwright: invenblocker: pheenixwright: invenblocker: forthefuns: ...

Target, Tumblr, and Blog: transparentalia: Transparent Denmark from Japanese promotional sticker set
Target, Tumblr, and Blog: transparentalia:

Transparent Denmark from Japanese promotional sticker set

transparentalia: Transparent Denmark from Japanese promotional sticker set