🔥 | Latest

Moms, Too Much, and True: snorlaxatives who would win in a fight: an army of lush employees vs an army of bath and body works employees??? discuss mattandjones lush employees, who are more adept at guerrilla warfare and fabian tactics. bath and body works employees rely too much on pitched battle and are not equipped well enough for prolonged conflict ceb3rus I disagree with some of that, I feel as though the Bath and Body Works employees are pretty well trained in the art of handling an all out attack. Their defenses are high and well coordinated. Remember, they deal with white moms on the daily, whereas I feel that Lush employees are more used to dealing with a younger generation of customers.l feel as though they'd be equally matched but in the end I feel with the advancement in technology that Lush possesses over Bath and Body Works in terms of sheer amount that they sell, ultimately Lush wins, but not without heavy casualties dreamnectar All true, but everyone is forgetting Bath and Body Works employees have extreme training dealing with the hell on Earth that is Semi Annual Sale Have you ever seen someone come between a white woman in her 40s and Vanilla Bean Noel at 75% off? Bath and Body Works employees have and still live to tell their stories alwaysasideways8 l think terrain is an important consideration? Lush employees are better at straight melee since they're used to fighting in close quarters, whereas B&BW employees have more experience in moving through wider terrain and using ranged attacks greenekangaroo this is the kind of discourse I want on my dash Source: snorlaxatives 1,590 points • 216 comments - Lush employees vs Bath and Body Works employees - IWSMT has amazing images, videos and anectodes to waste your time on
Moms, Too Much, and True: snorlaxatives
 who would win in a fight: an army of lush employees vs an army of bath
 and body works employees??? discuss
 mattandjones
 lush employees, who are more adept at guerrilla warfare and fabian
 tactics. bath and body works employees rely too much on pitched battle
 and are not equipped well enough for prolonged conflict
 ceb3rus
 I disagree with some of that, I feel as though the Bath and Body Works
 employees are pretty well trained in the art of handling an all out attack.
 Their defenses are high and well coordinated. Remember, they deal with
 white moms on the daily, whereas I feel that Lush employees are more
 used to dealing with a younger generation of customers.l feel as though
 they'd be equally matched but in the end I feel with the advancement in
 technology that Lush possesses over Bath and Body Works in terms of
 sheer amount that they sell, ultimately Lush wins, but not without heavy
 casualties
 dreamnectar
 All true, but everyone is forgetting Bath and Body Works employees have
 extreme training dealing with the hell on Earth that is Semi Annual Sale
 Have you ever seen someone come between a white woman in her 40s
 and Vanilla Bean Noel at 75% off? Bath and Body Works employees have
 and still live to tell their stories
 alwaysasideways8
 l think terrain is an important consideration? Lush employees are better at
 straight melee since they're used to fighting in close quarters, whereas
 B&BW employees have more experience in moving through wider terrain
 and using ranged attacks
 greenekangaroo
 this is the kind of discourse I want on my dash
 Source: snorlaxatives
1,590 points • 216 comments - Lush employees vs Bath and Body Works employees - IWSMT has amazing images, videos and anectodes to waste your time on

1,590 points • 216 comments - Lush employees vs Bath and Body Works employees - IWSMT has amazing images, videos and anectodes to waste your...

Bad, Chelsea, and Homeless: The Telegraph @Telegraph Follow Former rough sleeper Ed Sheeran wins permission for "anti-homeless" gates outside £8m London home Former rough sleeper Ed Sheeran wins permission for "anti-homeless" gates.. Pop superstar Ed Sheeran, who spent nights sleeping rough on the streets of London early in his career, has won planning permission to install "anti-homeless" r... telegraph.co.uk feminismisahatemovement: holybucketbatman: fuck-ler: capatalismnt: Please don’t pay for his music. also don’t listen to it, it’s extremely bad He’s wanting to do this to his home:  He submitted the proposal to the Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council and the plan was rejected because the proposed four-foot-high railings (fence) and simple cast iron gate (which was chosen purely privacy and security for the front of the home) were considered “too domestic” looking for the former industrial area. The council gave Sheeran a list of options for privacy “railings”, and after changing the proposal Sheeran was given permission that was more in line with the neighbourhood, which is in a conservation area.  A direct quote from Sheeran states: “Dear Natalie Edwards from The Sun newspaper. Your story is bollocks, I have done lots of work in the past for Crisis and Shelter and would never build railings outside my home for that reason.The reason was to keep the paps that you employ from being on my doorstep. Have a good day.” this comment has been substantiated by the local police and security companies that Sheeran and his neighbours have had to contact previously when paparazzi have been taking photographs not only of Sheeran’s house but inside his windows, and constantly knocking on his door and yelling outside his house. Think about this for a moment, a guy bought a house and fixed it up, he was trying to gain some privacy by asking for a simple fence and gate to indicate the property line and gain some distance from the paps, - which the police and council said was fine - and the newspapers who can no longer use these ill-gotten photos and are probably pissed have managed to spin this story to make it seem that this guy (whether you like his music or not), is an asshole and is anti-homeless. And you’re all eating this shit up and believing the newspapers, even though the Sun and Telegraph are well known across the UK for making shit up and lying. smh.  These days you have to fact-check 97% of newspaper articles as much as reddit trolls.
Bad, Chelsea, and Homeless: The Telegraph
 @Telegraph
 Follow
 Former rough sleeper Ed Sheeran wins
 permission for "anti-homeless" gates outside
 £8m London home
 Former rough sleeper Ed Sheeran wins permission for "anti-homeless" gates..
 Pop superstar Ed Sheeran, who spent nights sleeping rough on the streets of
 London early in his career, has won planning permission to install "anti-homeless" r...
 telegraph.co.uk
feminismisahatemovement:

holybucketbatman:

fuck-ler:

capatalismnt:
Please don’t pay for his music.

also don’t listen to it, it’s extremely bad

He’s wanting to do this to his home: 
He submitted the proposal to the Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council and the plan was rejected because the proposed four-foot-high railings (fence) and simple cast iron gate (which was chosen purely privacy and security for the front of the home) were considered “too domestic” looking for the former industrial area. The council gave Sheeran a list of options for privacy “railings”, and after changing the proposal Sheeran was given permission that was more in line with the neighbourhood, which is in a conservation area.  A direct quote from Sheeran states: “Dear Natalie Edwards from The Sun newspaper. Your story is bollocks, I have done lots of work in the past for Crisis and Shelter and would never build railings outside my home for that reason.The reason was to keep the paps that you employ from being on my doorstep. Have a good day.” this comment has been substantiated by the local police and security companies that Sheeran and his neighbours have had to contact previously when paparazzi have been taking photographs not only of Sheeran’s house but inside his windows, and constantly knocking on his door and yelling outside his house. Think about this for a moment, a guy bought a house and fixed it up, he was trying to gain some privacy by asking for a simple fence and gate to indicate the property line and gain some distance from the paps, - which the police and council said was fine - and the newspapers who can no longer use these ill-gotten photos and are probably pissed have managed to spin this story to make it seem that this guy (whether you like his music or not), is an asshole and is anti-homeless. And you’re all eating this shit up and believing the newspapers, even though the Sun and Telegraph are well known across the UK for making shit up and lying. smh. 

These days you have to fact-check 97% of newspaper articles as much as reddit trolls.

feminismisahatemovement: holybucketbatman: fuck-ler: capatalismnt: Please don’t pay for his music. also don’t listen to it, it’s extreme...