🔥 | Latest

God, Ignorant, and Love: HE WO MAN FE MALE HU MAN PER SON visual-poetry »swofehuperx by richard tipping (+) [vial mitosisisyourtosis men fabricated the idea that they are the default sex to compensate for their biological inferiority and general superfluousness this is not just the natural order this is the language of a patriarchal culture rhysiare Omg no, you are wrong on so many levels and as a linguist this makes me ache something terrible. In my linguistics dass in undergrad, we actually made fun of people who think like you along these lines and for good reason, because you are wholly ignorant and are choosing to spin narratives about things and fields which you know completely nothing about yet pretend you do. 1 She: This word evolved naturally from Old English from seo/heo which were just words to refer to feminine-female people evolving from Proto- Germanic words meaning that/there. He as a word evolved from the same ideas but Proto-Germanic words for thishere, Your idea of patriarchal language further falls apart when you compare this part of English to other Germanic languages, of which English is related, the words in German for he and she are 'er and sie", completely unrelated So it is by clear happenstance, not some patriarchal conspiracy that the words he and "she in English have similar form. 2. Woman: Oh god this one always gets my goat when people go for this one. Man did not used to mean "male", man used to mean humanity/human being, the old words in Old English for male adult person and female adult person were werman and wifman respectively, we can see this relation in words like werewolf and wife as being the remnants of the base "wer- and the base wif-. Woman evolved phonologically from the word wifman by natural processes where the 'f sound dropped and the became lax. Man dropped its wer stem for reasons mostly unknown but I can guarantee have nothing to do with patriarchy because phonological change has no basis in that. 3. Female: Male and Female actually come etymologically from two completely different words. Male comes from Old French masle which meant masculine, while Female came from Old French as well femella which meant young woman. This is another case, just like he and she where the words coincidentally ended up looking similar without having any direct correlation in historical linguistic processes to make them as such 4 Hman: This word etymologically derives from Proto-Indo- European "ghomon which means earthly being as opposed to heavenly being which would refer to gods. You have some small glimmer of hope here in that the word does eventually branch off into the word for man in some languages but this is still too small of a precedent to base any conspiratorial thinking like you are doing off of 5. Person: This one offends me the most, simply because I love the fuck out of Etruscan language and your continued ignorance just irks me at this point. Person derives from persona from Latin which meant the same meaning, which ultimately derived from phersu Etruscan for mask as Etruscans would often have theatre performers use masks to give identity to the performers. So never once did "person have any meaning to do with son So yes, this IS the natural order or language. Please never proselytise your faulty ideology and misandrist thinking within speaking about word origins and morphology again, as unless you actually do fact checking I will school the everloving hell out of you, stay in vour lane. Swofehuper He Man Male Manson
God, Ignorant, and Love: HE
 WO MAN
 FE MALE
 HU MAN
 PER SON
 visual-poetry
 »swofehuperx by richard tipping (+)
 [vial
 mitosisisyourtosis
 men fabricated the idea that they are the default sex to compensate for their
 biological inferiority and general superfluousness
 this is not just the natural order this is the language of a patriarchal culture
 rhysiare
 Omg no, you are wrong on so many levels and as a linguist this makes me
 ache something terrible. In my linguistics dass in undergrad, we actually made
 fun of people who think like you along these lines and for good reason,
 because you are wholly ignorant and are choosing to spin narratives about
 things and fields which you know completely nothing about yet pretend you do.
 1 She: This word evolved naturally from Old English from seo/heo which
 were just words to refer to feminine-female people evolving from Proto-
 Germanic words meaning that/there. He as a word evolved from the
 same ideas but Proto-Germanic words for thishere, Your idea of
 patriarchal language further falls apart when you compare this part of
 English to other Germanic languages, of which English is related, the
 words in German for he and she are 'er and sie", completely unrelated
 So it is by clear happenstance, not some patriarchal conspiracy that the
 words he and "she in English have similar form.
 2. Woman: Oh god this one always gets my goat when people go for this
 one. Man did not used to mean "male", man used to
 mean humanity/human being, the old words in Old English for male
 adult person and female adult person were werman and wifman
 respectively, we can see this relation in words like werewolf and wife as
 being the remnants of the base "wer- and the base wif-. Woman
 evolved phonologically from the word wifman by natural processes
 where the 'f sound dropped and the became lax. Man dropped
 its wer stem for reasons mostly unknown but I can guarantee have
 nothing to do with patriarchy because phonological change has no
 basis in that.
 3. Female: Male and Female actually come etymologically from two
 completely different words. Male comes from Old French masle which
 meant masculine, while Female came from Old French as well femella
 which meant young woman. This is another case, just like he and she
 where the words coincidentally ended up looking similar without having
 any direct correlation in historical linguistic processes to make them as
 such
 4 Hman: This word etymologically derives from Proto-Indo-
 European "ghomon which means earthly being as opposed to heavenly
 being which would refer to gods. You have some small glimmer of hope
 here in that the word does eventually branch off into the word for man
 in some languages but this is still too small of a precedent to base any
 conspiratorial thinking like you are doing off of
 5. Person: This one offends me the most, simply because I love the fuck
 out of Etruscan language and your continued ignorance just irks me at
 this point. Person derives from persona from Latin which meant the
 same meaning, which ultimately derived from phersu Etruscan
 for mask as Etruscans would often have theatre performers use masks
 to give identity to the performers. So never once did "person have any
 meaning to do with son So yes, this IS the natural order or language.
 Please never proselytise your faulty ideology and misandrist thinking within
 speaking about word origins and morphology again, as unless you actually do
 fact checking I will school the everloving hell out of you, stay in vour lane.
Swofehuper He Man Male Manson

Swofehuper He Man Male Manson

God, Marriage, and News: Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 29 Jun 2015 Marriage" girldefined.com/keeping-marria KEEPING MARRIAGE STRAIGHT WH) THE BIBLE NEVER RECOGNIZES "GAY MARRIAGE 2 READ POT GIRLDEFINED.COM/BLOG Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 20 Jun 2014 Please don't get sucked into the gay pride agenda. Don't base your beliefs on your emotions. God's word must be... fb.me/31ZBmV6KS Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 27 Jun 2015 TIMELY READJ Responding to the Homosexual Movement So here we are, up to our necks in the homosexual agenda... . b.me/7hTQArATk 4 1 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 26 Jun 2014 Sad day. @BananaRepublic supports and encourages the homosexual agenda with #PrideMonth on.fb.me/TCa9DR 1 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 21 Jun 2014 Disturbing fairy tale book hits public libraries promoting homosexual marriage. bit.ly/UWnAjo Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 18 Jun 2014 How does someone prove they are "gay"? Find the answer on the blog today bit.ly/1plofs6 CA Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 18 Jun 2014 New Post) The fb.me/6kXwRqltP Gay Pride Movement and Their Sneaky Agen... Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 20 Jun 2014 New Post Responding to the Homosexual Movement girldefined.com/responding-hom... .fb.me/6lgj4ZPET tl. 1 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined .4 Jun 2014 oan c cake. christianpost.com/news/baker-for... via @ChristianPost Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 6 May 2014 Should Christians attend the wedding of a gay couple?" Thought provoking answers from @gotquestions gotquestions.org/gay-wedding.ht... Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 3 May 2014 Replying to @TrueWoman "@TrueWoman: Should Christians use the term "Gay Christian"? Here's a helpful article: buff.ly/1pXr3vm" Should Christians Use the Term "Gay Christian"? In his new book God and the Gay Christian, Matthew Vines seeks to legitimate homosexual practice among evangelicals. I responded to this heretical teaching [...] patheos.com keepingupwithfundies: totallyrobophobic: christiangossipgirl: The only thing Girl Defined uses Twitter for is automated posts from their other platforms…  That means the links are still there to their homophobic blog posts they’ve since deleted. Oopsies. But seriously, I’m disgusted. They were way more extreme on the topic than I was aware. They scrubbed their blog after their homophobia was exposed in this YouTube video by Rachel Oates.  Being ashamed of your opinion if called out means you know you are wrong. (Annie)
God, Marriage, and News: Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 29 Jun 2015
 Marriage" girldefined.com/keeping-marria
 KEEPING
 MARRIAGE
 STRAIGHT
 WH)
 THE BIBLE
 NEVER
 RECOGNIZES
 "GAY
 MARRIAGE
 2
 READ POT
 GIRLDEFINED.COM/BLOG
 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 20 Jun 2014
 Please don't get sucked into the gay pride agenda. Don't base your beliefs on
 your emotions. God's word must be... fb.me/31ZBmV6KS

 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 27 Jun 2015
 TIMELY READJ Responding to the Homosexual Movement
 So here we are, up to our necks in the homosexual agenda... . b.me/7hTQArATk
 4
 1
 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 26 Jun 2014
 Sad day. @BananaRepublic supports and encourages the homosexual agenda
 with #PrideMonth on.fb.me/TCa9DR
 1
 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 21 Jun 2014
 Disturbing fairy tale book hits public libraries promoting homosexual marriage.
 bit.ly/UWnAjo

 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 18 Jun 2014
 How does someone prove they are "gay"? Find the answer on the blog today
 bit.ly/1plofs6
 CA
 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 18 Jun 2014
 New Post) The
 fb.me/6kXwRqltP
 Gay Pride Movement and Their Sneaky Agen...

 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 20 Jun 2014
 New Post Responding to the Homosexual Movement
 girldefined.com/responding-hom... .fb.me/6lgj4ZPET
 tl.
 1
 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined .4 Jun 2014
 oan c
 cake. christianpost.com/news/baker-for... via @ChristianPost

 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 6 May 2014
 Should Christians attend the wedding of a gay couple?" Thought provoking
 answers from @gotquestions gotquestions.org/gay-wedding.ht...
 Girl Defined @Girl_Defined 3 May 2014
 Replying to @TrueWoman
 "@TrueWoman: Should Christians use the term "Gay Christian"? Here's a helpful
 article: buff.ly/1pXr3vm"
 Should Christians Use the Term "Gay Christian"?
 In his new book God and the Gay Christian, Matthew
 Vines seeks to legitimate homosexual practice among
 evangelicals. I responded to this heretical teaching [...]
 patheos.com
keepingupwithfundies:
totallyrobophobic:

christiangossipgirl:

The only thing Girl Defined uses Twitter for is automated posts from their other platforms… 
That means the links are still there to their homophobic blog posts they’ve since deleted. Oopsies.
But seriously, I’m disgusted. They were way more extreme on the topic than I was aware. 

They scrubbed their blog after their homophobia was exposed in this YouTube video by Rachel Oates. 

Being ashamed of your opinion if called out means you know you are wrong. (Annie)

keepingupwithfundies: totallyrobophobic: christiangossipgirl: The only thing Girl Defined uses Twitter for is automated posts from their o...

Asian, Bad, and Beef: Imaan Sheikh @sheikhimaan POC: *jokes about white people not seasoning their food and not having rhythm* White people: Have you ever been hated or discriminated against? I have. l've been protested and demonstrated against. dirkapitated-yet-again: jlongbone: sophisticatedfangirling: thewolfman1995: cheshireinthemiddle: livbiv17: mizumanta: livbiv17: mizumanta: livbiv17: livbiv17: raychjackson: lmao yo OMG SO RELEVENT Reblogging AGAIN. 😩 You know having unseasoned food is an actual thing in japan. “Simple flavors” is part of Japanese food culture. No seasoning or just salt. I think we should mock japanese people too. Generalize them as having no taste or ability to cook. And laugh at them if they say it’s racism or childish. The difference is white people colonized—raped, stole and destroyed—other cultures for these seasonings…that they don’t even use ☺️therein lies the irony. Also…not the point of the post…the point is, making fun of white people’s weird shit does not equal racism. I said what I said ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ So staaahp trolling and go read a book maybe. Lady, i have 2 degrees on this. I literally have walls of books on the history of food. White people didnt rape, colonize, steal, or destroy anymore than the Chinese did. And i doubt you would be okay saying this about Asians. People tended to use less seasoning back ghen because food was bred and grown differently. Things like chicken and beef had way more natural flavor, so additional seasonings werent really needed. In fact, for some places, seasonings were typically used by the poor, who were left with bad tasting scraps. Other places had them solely for the rich, since non native spices were incredibly expensive. Just like with Japanese culture, food culture in European cultures are often rely on tradition. Traditional methods are used, even if obsolete from newly available ingredients. It’s why old traditional methods of wine and cheese making are still used today. In fact, simple flavors and limited seasonings are available in a large amount of African dishes. The whole “white people dont season their food” stereotype originated in the US, and is clearly wrong, since European immigrants brought over tons of well seasoned and loved food like pizza, sausages, gyros, literally a ton of well known french dishes. I mean most southern cuisine came from French immigrants, and African slaves and paid servants (who at the time didnt even have access to most spices) simply copied those. The only real nuance is the addition of peppers and things like nutmeg and corn (originating in the americas) which European immigrants had already been using in their recipes. ( Actual soul food that can be entirely credited to African Americans is limited). The point is that the caricature of white people’s cooking being unseasoned is a very real part of reality for other cultures. Japan prides its traditional food with simplistic flavors. As in minimal or no seasoning. So any mocking you have for white people, equally (if not moreso) applies to the Japanese. You clearly don’t think it’s okay to say these same things to Asians, so it is clear that it isnt the action itself that you have a problem with, but the race doing it. Youre a racist. You think just because you mr opinions are popular and other bad activists are on your side, that you are in the right. I think we know from history that a popular opinion isnt always the right one. I’ve seen how you reply to other people who disagree with you and it is so childish. You just tell them to read a book or go to a library without considering their knowledge on the subject. I am here to tell you that i am much more knowledgable than you are on this subject. You are just making up stuff to excuse the fact that you dont like white people. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/03/26/394339284/how-snobbery-helped-take-the-spice-out-of-european-cooking I literally cannot make this shit up lol. 😂 your degrees are obviously for naught. Also..the British and Europe DID colonize these areas…which included the aforementioned atrocities. Not racist. Just have a grasp on history. Get one. How Snobbery Helped Take The Spice Out Of European Cooking I dont think you even read this. It clearly states that while Indians (and it only relies on indians, not the mentioned Japanese or really any other Asian country) focus on curry, while Europeans often focused on gravies and sauces. Italian sauces for instance relied on fresh herbs (not spices), while French sauces relied more on stocks. Once dried peppers came over, many countries used paprika to season their stews, and others regularly used rosemary, bayleaf, thyme, and pepper. It’s really odd that you would compare any country’s use of spice to India’s. Essentially anyone’s would use less spice in comparison. In fact, as shown in the link, India is known for contrasting flavors using odd spice combinations that most countries (including non european) would never use. It doesnt really prove your point. It just shows that you really dont understand how these things work. Your grasp of history is poor, because according to your other posts, you actually think white people invented racism. You keep mentioning atrocities Europeans committed and act like they are the only ones who did them, which gives you permission to be racist. You are the one who doesnt understand history. And you do not understand food culture among European countries. You are just driven by stereotypes and opinion peices. Hungarian paprika chicken Beef bourguignon Roasted gyro meat Just because they dont have spice blends with 30 components like many indian masalas, doesnt mean they arent seasoned. As someone who has made these dishes (and many others from various countries), and as someone with more education on the subject, I am here to tell you that you are wrong, misonformed, and racist. “the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t” sometimes i don’t even know what to say to shit like that. i… i can’t “HAHA WYPIPO TAKE JOKES SO SURIUS!”  *later*  “the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t““ the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t Yes. Hello. Korea and China both wanna have a word with you. Lmaoooo imagine denying Japanese colonialism. Like holy shit some of that happened in living memory.
Asian, Bad, and Beef: Imaan Sheikh
 @sheikhimaan
 POC: *jokes about white people
 not seasoning their food and not
 having rhythm*
 White people:
 Have you ever been hated or discriminated against?
 I have. l've been protested and demonstrated against.
dirkapitated-yet-again:
jlongbone:

sophisticatedfangirling:

thewolfman1995:

cheshireinthemiddle:


livbiv17:

mizumanta:


livbiv17:

mizumanta:


livbiv17:


livbiv17:


raychjackson:

lmao yo

OMG SO RELEVENT 


Reblogging AGAIN. 😩 


You know having unseasoned food is an actual thing in japan. “Simple flavors” is part of Japanese food culture. No seasoning or just salt. 

I think we should mock japanese people too. Generalize them as having no taste or ability to cook. And laugh at them if they say it’s racism or childish. 


The difference is white people colonized—raped, stole and destroyed—other cultures for these seasonings…that they don’t even use ☺️therein lies the irony. Also…not the point of the post…the point is, making fun of white people’s weird shit does not equal racism. 
I said what I said ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 
So staaahp trolling and go read a book maybe.

Lady, i have 2 degrees on this. I literally have walls of books on the history of food. White people didnt rape, colonize, steal, or destroy anymore than the Chinese did. And i doubt you would be okay saying this about Asians. 
People tended to use less seasoning back ghen because food was bred and grown differently. Things like chicken and beef had way more natural flavor, so additional seasonings werent really needed. In fact, for some places, seasonings were typically used by the poor, who were left with bad tasting scraps. Other places had them solely for the rich, since non native spices were incredibly expensive. 
Just like with Japanese culture, food culture in European cultures are often rely on tradition. Traditional methods are used, even if obsolete from newly available ingredients. It’s why old traditional methods of wine and cheese making are still used today. In fact, simple flavors and limited seasonings are available in a large amount of African dishes. The whole “white people dont season their food” stereotype originated in the US, and is clearly wrong, since European immigrants brought over tons of well seasoned and loved food like pizza, sausages, gyros, literally a ton of well known french dishes. I mean most southern cuisine came from French immigrants, and African slaves and paid servants (who at the time didnt even have access to most spices) simply copied those. The only real nuance is the addition of peppers and things like nutmeg and corn (originating in the americas) which European immigrants had already been using in their recipes. ( Actual soul food that can be entirely credited to African Americans is limited). 
The point is that the caricature of white people’s cooking being unseasoned is a very real part of reality for other cultures. Japan prides its traditional food with simplistic flavors. As in minimal or no seasoning. So any mocking you have for white people, equally (if not moreso) applies to the Japanese. You clearly don’t think it’s okay to say these same things to Asians, so it is clear that it isnt the action itself that you have a problem with, but the race doing it. 
Youre a racist. You think just because you mr opinions are popular and other bad activists are on your side, that you are in the right. I think we know from history that a popular opinion isnt always the right one. 
I’ve seen how you reply to other people who disagree with you and it is so childish. You just tell them to read a book or go to a library without considering their knowledge on the subject. I am here to tell you that i am much more knowledgable than you are on this subject. You are just making up stuff to excuse the fact that you dont like white people. 


https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/03/26/394339284/how-snobbery-helped-take-the-spice-out-of-european-cooking

I literally cannot make this shit up lol. 😂 your degrees are obviously for naught. Also..the British and Europe DID colonize these areas…which included the aforementioned atrocities. 

Not racist. Just have a grasp on history. Get one. 
How Snobbery Helped Take The Spice Out Of European Cooking

I dont think you even read this. 
It clearly states that while Indians (and it only relies on indians, not the mentioned Japanese or really any other Asian country) focus on curry, while Europeans often focused on gravies and sauces. 
Italian sauces for instance relied on fresh herbs (not spices), while French sauces relied more on stocks. Once dried peppers came over, many countries used paprika to season their stews, and others regularly used rosemary, bayleaf, thyme, and pepper. 
It’s really odd that you would compare any country’s use of spice to India’s. Essentially anyone’s would use less spice in comparison. In fact, as shown in the link, India is known for contrasting flavors using odd spice combinations that most countries (including non european) would never use. It doesnt really prove your point. It just shows that you really dont understand how these things work. 
Your grasp of history is poor, because according to your other posts, you actually think white people invented racism. You keep mentioning atrocities Europeans committed and act like they are the only ones who did them, which gives you permission to be racist. 
You are the one who doesnt understand history. And you do not understand food culture among European countries. You are just driven by stereotypes and opinion peices. 
Hungarian paprika chicken 
Beef bourguignon 
Roasted gyro meat 
Just because they dont have spice blends with 30 components like many indian masalas, doesnt mean they arent seasoned. 
As someone who has made these dishes (and many others from various countries), and as someone with more education on the subject, I am here to tell you that you are wrong, misonformed, and racist. 



“the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t”
sometimes i don’t even know what to say to shit like that. i… i can’t

“HAHA WYPIPO TAKE JOKES SO SURIUS!” 
*later* 
“the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t““


 the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t
Yes. Hello. Korea and China both wanna have a word with you.


Lmaoooo imagine denying Japanese colonialism. Like holy shit some of that happened in living memory.

dirkapitated-yet-again: jlongbone: sophisticatedfangirling: thewolfman1995: cheshireinthemiddle: livbiv17: mizumanta: livbiv17: miz...

Anaconda, Anna, and Music: socially squidward @AlienNationzzz rt if you know why Open Culture @openculture Maria Anna Mozart Was a Musical Prodigy Like Her Brother Wolfgang, So Why Did She Get Erased from History? goo.gl/s39qH8 <p><a href="http://siryouarebeingmocked.tumblr.com/post/174065271801/thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound-because-it-is-very" class="tumblr_blog">siryouarebeingmocked</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound.tumblr.com/post/173631383408/because-it-is-very-difficult-to-say-the-least-to" class="tumblr_blog">thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound</a>:</p><blockquote> <p>Because it is very difficult, to say the least, to be famous for your musical compositions if none of them survive to the present day, obviously:<br/></p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Anna_Mozart#Childhood">There is evidence that Marianne wrote musical compositions, as there are letters from Wolfgang praising her work, but the voluminous correspondence of her father never mentions any of her compositions, and none have survived.</a></p></blockquote> <p>It is also clear that she did not compose nearly as prolifically as her brother, and obviously, the fewer works you create, the higher the chance that 100% of them will be lost to time.</p> <p>In short: I know you are pretending to “know why”. As usual with these kinds of assumptions, you are wrong.</p> </blockquote> <p>“History forgot someone. It must be sexism.”<br/></p></blockquote> <p>Plus she was not “erased from history“. I’ve been teaching my students about Mozart this month as he is our composer of the month and every bio I’ve used mentions his sister. As a music student I heard about her all the time. We know she was a talented musician we just don’t know her compositions because as the person above mentioned they did not survive to the modern era.</p>
Anaconda, Anna, and Music: socially squidward
 @AlienNationzzz
 rt if you know why
 Open Culture @openculture
 Maria Anna Mozart Was a Musical Prodigy
 Like Her Brother Wolfgang, So Why Did She
 Get Erased from History? goo.gl/s39qH8
<p><a href="http://siryouarebeingmocked.tumblr.com/post/174065271801/thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound-because-it-is-very" class="tumblr_blog">siryouarebeingmocked</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="https://thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound.tumblr.com/post/173631383408/because-it-is-very-difficult-to-say-the-least-to" class="tumblr_blog">thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>Because it is very difficult, to say the least, to be famous for your
 musical compositions if none of them survive to the present day, 
obviously:<br/></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Anna_Mozart#Childhood">There is evidence that Marianne wrote musical compositions, as there are
 letters from Wolfgang praising her work, but the voluminous 
correspondence of her father never mentions any of her compositions, and
 none have survived.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It is also clear that she 
did not compose nearly as prolifically as her brother, and obviously, 
the fewer works you create, the higher the chance that 100% of them will
 be lost to time.</p>
<p>In short: I know you are pretending to “know why”. As usual with these kinds of assumptions, you are wrong.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“History forgot someone. It must be sexism.”<br/></p></blockquote>

<p>Plus she was not “erased from history“. I’ve been teaching my students about Mozart this month as he is our composer of the month and every bio I’ve used mentions his sister. As a music student I heard about her all the time. We know she was a talented musician we just don’t know her compositions because as the person above mentioned they did not survive to the modern era.</p>

siryouarebeingmocked: thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound: Because it is very difficult, to say the least, to be famous for your musical composit...